Centre de recherche de l'institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Quebec City, Canada.
Sunnybrook Research Institute, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Dec;9(1):2597-2605. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1850184.
The worldwide repercussions of COVID-19 sparked important research efforts, yet the detailed contribution of aerosols in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 has not been elucidated. In an attempt to quantify viral aerosols in the environment of infected patients, we collected 100 air samples in acute care hospital rooms hosting 22 patients over the course of nearly two months using three different air sampling protocols. Quantification by RT-qPCR (ORF1b) led to 11 positive samples from 6 patient rooms ( < 40). Viral cultures were negative. No correlation was observed between particular symptoms, length of hospital stay, clinical parameters, and time since symptom onset and the detection of airborne viral RNA. Low detection rates in the hospital rooms may be attributable to the appropriate application of mitigation methods according to the risk control hierarchy, such as increased ventilation to 4.85 air changes per hour to create negative pressure rooms. Our work estimates the mean emission rate of patients and potential airborne concentration in the absence of ventilation. Additional research is needed understand aerosolization events occur, contributing factors, and how best to prevent them.
新冠疫情在全球范围内引发了重要的研究工作,但气溶胶在 SARS-CoV-2 传播中的详细作用仍未阐明。为了定量检测感染患者环境中的病毒气溶胶,我们在急性护理病房内对 22 名患者进行了近两个月的研究,使用了三种不同的空气采样方案,共采集了 100 个空气样本。通过 RT-qPCR(ORF1b)定量检测,从 6 个患者病房中检测到 11 份阳性样本(<40)。病毒培养结果为阴性。未观察到特定症状、住院时间、临床参数以及症状出现时间与空气中病毒 RNA 的检测之间存在相关性。医院病房中低水平的检出率可能归因于根据风险控制等级适当应用了缓解措施,例如增加通风至每小时 4.85 次换气以创建负压病房。本研究估计了患者的平均排放率和在没有通风的情况下潜在的空气传播浓度。还需要进一步研究以了解气溶胶化事件的发生、影响因素以及如何最好地预防这些事件。