Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler- Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK) Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Strahlenther Onkol. 2021 Apr;197(4):281-287. doi: 10.1007/s00066-020-01700-1. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a common side effect of cancer treatment, particularly in breast cancer patients. Over the past decade, the multimodal management of breast cancer has undergone several changes, such as the establishment of postoperative hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) as a new standard protocol and the reduced use of chemotherapy. The aim of the current study was to investigate the impact of these changes on quality of life (QoL) and CRF.
A total of 66 patients was assessed for QoL and CRF using the FACIT‑F questionnaire. Patients were asked to complete the paper-based questionnaire before (TP1) and at the end of radiotherapy (TP2) as well as at follow-up (TP3). Subgroups were compared based on fractionation and previous application of chemotherapy.
For the entire cohort, no significant changes in the severity of fatigue were seen. A mild decrease of physical wellbeing (PWB) from TP1 to TP2 was observed (22.2 vs. 20.7, p = 0.007). Fatigue at TP1 was more severe in patients receiving chemotherapy before RT (37.9 vs. 30.5, p = 0.041). Only patients without preceding chemotherapy showed a significant worsening of fatigue from TP1 to TP2 (37.9 vs 34.8, p = 0.005). The same is true for physical wellbeing (PWB), with a decrease from TP1 to TP2 in chemotherapy-naïve patients only (23.5 vs. 21.4, p = 0.002). Fractionation did not impact any of the investigated endpoints.
Patients undergoing postoperative RT for breast cancer constitute a heterogeneous patient population with varying risks of developing CRF influenced by previous treatments. Therefore, patient selection seems to be critical when interventional studies addressing CRF during radiotherapy are designed.
癌症相关性疲劳(CRF)是癌症治疗的常见副作用,尤其是在乳腺癌患者中。在过去的十年中,乳腺癌的多模式管理发生了一些变化,例如建立术后分割放疗(RT)作为新的标准方案和减少化疗的应用。本研究旨在探讨这些变化对生活质量(QoL)和 CRF 的影响。
共 66 例患者使用 FACIT-F 问卷评估 QoL 和 CRF。患者被要求在治疗前(TP1)、放疗结束时(TP2)和随访时(TP3)填写纸质问卷。根据分割和先前化疗的应用情况对亚组进行比较。
对于整个队列,疲劳严重程度没有明显变化。从 TP1 到 TP2 观察到身体福利(PWB)轻度下降(22.2 对 20.7,p=0.007)。在接受 RT 前接受化疗的患者中,TP1 时的疲劳更为严重(37.9 对 30.5,p=0.041)。只有未接受先前化疗的患者从 TP1 到 TP2 的疲劳明显恶化(37.9 对 34.8,p=0.005)。对于身体福利(PWB)也是如此,仅在无化疗的患者中从 TP1 到 TP2 下降(23.5 对 21.4,p=0.002)。分割方式对所有研究终点均无影响。
接受乳腺癌术后 RT 的患者构成了一个异质性的患者群体,其发展 CRF 的风险因先前的治疗而异。因此,当设计针对放疗期间 CRF 的干预性研究时,患者选择似乎至关重要。