• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情感与喜好:导演情感表达和(不)喜好知识如何影响成年人遵循无知说话者指示的能力。

Emotion and liking: how director emotional expression and knowledge of (dis)liking may impact adults' ability to follow the instructions of an ignorant speaker.

机构信息

Psychology Department, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, L39 4PY, UK.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2021 Oct;85(7):2755-2768. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01441-x. Epub 2020 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-020-01441-x
PMID:33211159
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8440264/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Theory of mind (ToM), the ability to understand that others have different knowledge and beliefs to ourselves, has been the subject of extensive research which suggests that we are not always efficient at taking another's perspective, known as visual perspective taking (VPT). This has been studied extensively and a growing literature has explored the individual-level factors that may affect perspective taking (e.g. empathy and group membership). However, while emotion and (dis)liking are key aspects within everyday social interaction, research has not hitherto explored how these factors may impact ToM.

METHOD

A total of 164 participants took part in a modified director task (31 males (19%), M age = 20.65, SD age = 5.34), exploring how correct object selection may be impacted by another's emotion (director facial emotion; neutral × happy × sad) and knowledge of their (dis)likes (i.e. director likes specific objects).

RESULT

When the director liked the target object or disliked the competitor object, accuracy rates were increased relative to when he disliked the target object or liked the competitor object. When the emotion shown by the director was incongruent with their stated (dis)liking of an object (e.g. happy when he disliked an object), accuracy rates were also increased. None of these effects were significant in the analysis of response time. These findings suggest that knowledge of liking may impact ToM use, as can emotional incongruency, perhaps by increasing the saliency of perspective differences between participant and director.

CONCLUSION

As well as contributing further to our understanding of real-life social interactions, these findings may have implications for ToM research, where it appears that more consideration of the target/director's characteristics may be prudent.

摘要

背景

心理理论(ToM),即理解他人拥有与自己不同的知识和信念的能力,一直是广泛研究的主题,研究表明,我们并不总是能够有效地从他人的角度看问题,这被称为视觉视角转换(VPT)。这已经被广泛研究过,越来越多的文献探讨了可能影响视角转换的个体因素(例如同理心和群体成员身份)。然而,尽管情感和(不)喜欢是日常社交互动的关键方面,但迄今为止,研究尚未探讨这些因素如何影响心理理论。

方法

共有 164 名参与者参与了一项经过修改的导演任务(31 名男性(19%),M 年龄= 20.65,SD 年龄= 5.34),探讨了另一个人的情绪(导演的面部表情;中性×快乐×悲伤)和对他们(不)喜好的了解(即导演喜欢特定的物体)如何影响正确的物体选择。

结果

当导演喜欢目标物体或不喜欢竞争物体时,相对于当他不喜欢目标物体或喜欢竞争物体时,准确性会提高。当导演表现出的情绪与他们对物体的(不)喜好不一致时(例如,当他不喜欢一个物体时感到高兴),准确性也会提高。在分析反应时间时,这些影响都不显著。这些发现表明,对喜好的了解可能会影响心理理论的使用,而情绪不一致性可能会增加参与者和导演之间视角差异的显著性,从而产生影响。

结论

这些发现除了进一步加深我们对现实生活中社交互动的理解外,还可能对心理理论研究产生影响,因为似乎需要更多地考虑目标/导演的特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d49/8440264/93f5e1336940/426_2020_1441_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d49/8440264/51abed04757a/426_2020_1441_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d49/8440264/4091523e314a/426_2020_1441_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d49/8440264/80a0116cfadd/426_2020_1441_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d49/8440264/93f5e1336940/426_2020_1441_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d49/8440264/51abed04757a/426_2020_1441_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d49/8440264/4091523e314a/426_2020_1441_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d49/8440264/80a0116cfadd/426_2020_1441_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d49/8440264/93f5e1336940/426_2020_1441_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Emotion and liking: how director emotional expression and knowledge of (dis)liking may impact adults' ability to follow the instructions of an ignorant speaker.情感与喜好:导演情感表达和(不)喜好知识如何影响成年人遵循无知说话者指示的能力。
Psychol Res. 2021 Oct;85(7):2755-2768. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01441-x. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
2
Tracking the impact of depression in a perspective-taking task.追踪在换位思考任务中抑郁的影响。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 1;7(1):14821. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13922-y.
3
In people who drink more, facets of theory of mind may be impaired by alcohol stimuli.在饮酒较多的人群中,酒精刺激可能会损害心理理论的各个方面。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 Apr 1;245:109811. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109811. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
4
Developing an understanding of others' emotional states: Relations among affective theory of mind and empathy measures in early childhood.发展对他人情绪状态的理解:幼儿时期情感心理理论和同理心测量之间的关系。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2020 Jun;38(2):151-166. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12322. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
5
Visuospatial perspective-taking in social-emotional development: enhancing young children's mind and emotion understanding via block building training.社会情感发展中的空间视角-taking:通过积木搭建训练增强幼儿的心智和情绪理解。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Nov 12;10(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00976-5.
6
Development of online use of theory of mind during adolescence: An eye-tracking study.青少年时期心理理论在线使用的发展:一项眼动追踪研究。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Sep;149:81-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
7
Role of context in affective theory of mind in Alzheimer's disease.语境在阿尔茨海默病情感心理理论中的作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Oct;119:363-372. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.08.025. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
8
Social Class Predicts Emotion Perception and Perspective-Taking Performance in Adults.社会阶层预测成年人的情绪感知和换位思考表现。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Jan;47(1):42-56. doi: 10.1177/0146167220914116. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
9
Does interference between self and other perspectives in theory of mind tasks reflect a common underlying process? Evidence from individual differences in theory of mind and inhibitory control.心理理论任务中自我与他人观点之间的干扰是否反映了共同的潜在过程?来自心理理论和抑制控制个体差异的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Feb;27(1):178-190. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01656-z.
10
Oxytocin improves behavioural and neural deficits in inferring others' social emotions in autism.催产素可改善自闭症患者推断他人社会情绪的行为和神经缺陷。
Brain. 2014 Nov;137(Pt 11):3073-86. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu231. Epub 2014 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Agent-Object Relationships in Level-2 Visual Perspective Taking: An Eye-Tracking Study.二级视觉观点采择中的施动者-客体关系:一项眼动追踪研究。
J Cogn. 2024 Oct 10;7(1):72. doi: 10.5334/joc.398. eCollection 2024.
2
Manipulating avatar age and gender in level-2 visual perspective taking.在二级视觉观点采集中操纵化身的年龄和性别。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Aug;30(4):1431-1441. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02249-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Does interference between self and other perspectives in theory of mind tasks reflect a common underlying process? Evidence from individual differences in theory of mind and inhibitory control.心理理论任务中自我与他人观点之间的干扰是否反映了共同的潜在过程?来自心理理论和抑制控制个体差异的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Feb;27(1):178-190. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01656-z.
2
Attribution of vision and knowledge in 'spontaneous perspective taking'.自发换位思考中的视觉和知识归因。
Psychol Res. 2020 Sep;84(6):1758-1765. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01179-1. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
3
Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation.
情感与动机的演变概念
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 7;9:1647. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01647. eCollection 2018.
4
Executive function underlies both perspective selection and calculation in Level-1 visual perspective taking.执行功能是一级视觉观点采择中视角选择和计算的基础。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1526-1534. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1496-8.
5
Intergroup visual perspective-taking: Shared group membership impairs self-perspective inhibition but may facilitate perspective calculation.组间视觉视角采择:共享的群体成员身份会削弱自我视角抑制,但可能有助于视角计算。
Cognition. 2017 Sep;166:371-381. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
6
Development of online use of theory of mind during adolescence: An eye-tracking study.青少年时期心理理论在线使用的发展:一项眼动追踪研究。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Sep;149:81-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
7
Self-other control processes in social cognition: from imitation to empathy.社会认知中的自我-他人控制过程:从模仿到共情
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Jan 19;371(1686):20150079. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0079.
8
Can emotions influence level-1 visual perspective taking?情绪会影响一级视觉观点采择吗?
Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jan-Oct;7(1-4):182-91. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2015.1043879. Epub 2015 May 15.
9
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
10
Evolutionary explanations of emotions.情绪的进化解释。
Hum Nat. 1990 Sep;1(3):261-89. doi: 10.1007/BF02733986.