Cook Tim, Gupta Kim, Dyer Chris, Fackrell Robin, Wexler Sarah, Boyes Heather, Colleypriest Ben, Graham Richard, Meehan Helen, Merritt Sarah, Robinson Derek, Marden Bernie
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust, Bath, UK
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust, Bath, UK.
J Med Ethics. 2020 Nov 20;47(7):456-63. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106771.
Early in the COVID-19 pandemic there was widespread concern that healthcare systems would be overwhelmed, and specifically, that there would be insufficient critical care capacity in terms of beds, ventilators or staff to care for patients. In the UK, this was avoided by a threefold approach involving widespread, rapid expansion of critical care capacity, reduction of healthcare demand from non-COVID-19 sources by temporarily pausing much of normal healthcare delivery, and by governmental and societal responses that reduced demand through national lockdown. Despite high-level documents designed to help manage limited critical care capacity, none provided sufficient operational direction to enable use at the bedside in situations requiring triage. We present and describe the development of a structured process for fair allocation of critical care resources in the setting of insufficient capacity. The document combines a wide variety of factors known to impact on outcome from critical illness, integrated with broad-based clinical judgement to enable structured, explicit, transparent decision-making founded on robust ethical principles. It aims to improve communication and allocate resources fairly, while avoiding triage decisions based on a single disease, comorbidity, patient age or degree of frailty. It is designed to support and document decision-making. The document has not been needed to date, nor adopted as hospital policy. However, as the pandemic evolves, the resumption of necessary non-COVID-19 healthcare and economic activity mean capacity issues and the potential need for triage may yet return. The document is presented as a starting point for stakeholder feedback and discussion.
在新冠疫情早期,人们普遍担心医疗系统会不堪重负,特别是在床位、呼吸机或医护人员方面,用于救治患者的重症监护能力不足。在英国,通过三种方式避免了这种情况:大幅快速扩大重症监护能力;通过暂时停止大部分常规医疗服务,减少非新冠疫情源的医疗需求;以及政府和社会通过全国封锁减少需求。尽管有旨在帮助管理有限重症监护能力的高级文件,但没有一份文件提供足够的操作指南,以便在需要分诊的情况下在床边使用。我们展示并描述了在能力不足的情况下公平分配重症监护资源的结构化流程的制定。该文件结合了已知会影响危重病结局的各种因素,并与广泛的临床判断相结合,以实现基于强有力的伦理原则的结构化、明确、透明的决策。其目的是改善沟通并公平分配资源,同时避免基于单一疾病、合并症、患者年龄或虚弱程度做出分诊决定。它旨在支持决策并记录决策过程。该文件至今尚未被需要,也未被采纳为医院政策。然而,随着疫情的发展,恢复必要的非新冠医疗和经济活动意味着能力问题和潜在的分诊需求可能会再次出现。该文件作为利益相关者反馈和讨论的起点呈现。