Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London.
Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge.
Psychol Sci. 2020 Dec;31(12):1585-1601. doi: 10.1177/0956797620957625. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
Adolescence is associated with heightened social influence, especially from peers. This can lead to detrimental decision-making in domains such as risky behavior but may also raise opportunities for prosocial behavior. We used an incentivized charitable-donations task to investigate how people revise decisions after learning about the donations of others and how this is affected by age ( = 220; age range = 11-35 years). Our results showed that the probability of social influence decreased with age within this age range. In addition, whereas previous research has suggested that adults are more likely to conform to the behavior of selfish others than to the behavior of prosocial others, here we observed no evidence of such an asymmetry in midadolescents. We discuss possible interpretations of these findings in relation to the social context of the task, the perceived value of money, and social decision-making across development.
青春期与增强的社会影响有关,尤其是来自同龄人的影响。这可能导致在风险行为等领域做出不利的决策,但也可能为亲社会行为创造机会。我们使用了一个有奖励的慈善捐赠任务来研究人们在了解他人的捐赠后如何修改决策,以及年龄(n = 220;年龄范围为 11-35 岁)如何影响这一过程。我们的结果表明,在这个年龄范围内,社会影响的可能性随着年龄的增长而降低。此外,尽管之前的研究表明,成年人更有可能顺应自私他人的行为,而不是亲社会他人的行为,但在这里,我们在中期青少年中没有观察到这种不对称性的证据。我们讨论了这些发现与任务的社会背景、对金钱的感知价值以及整个发展过程中的社会决策之间的可能解释。