Suppr超能文献

等速测试:两点法评估力-速度关系的敏感性,以区分肌肉群和参与者的身体活动水平。

Isokinetic Testing: Sensitivity of the Force-Velocity Relationship Assessed through the Two-Point Method to Discriminate between Muscle Groups and Participants' Physical Activity Levels.

机构信息

Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Belgrade, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia.

Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, 11129 Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 19;17(22):8570. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228570.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Isokinetic testing has been routinely used to assess the capacities of individual muscle groups. In this study we aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of the force-point (F-v) relationship assessed through the two-point method to discriminate between antagonist muscle groups and males with different physical activity levels.

METHODS

The concentric force output of the knee, hip, elbow, and shoulder flexors and extensors of 27 active and 13 non-active men was recorded at 60 and 180°/s to determine the F-v relationship parameters (maximum force [], maximum velocity [], and maximum power [P]).

RESULTS

and P were higher for knee extensors (effect size [ES] = 1.97 and 0.57, respectively), hip extensors (ES = 2.52 and 0.77, respectively), and shoulder flexors (ES = 1.67 and 0.83, respectively) compared to their antagonist muscles, while was higher for knee flexors compared to knee extensors (ES = 0.59). Active males revealed higher for knee extensors (ES = 0.72) and knee flexors (ES = 0.83) and higher P for knee flexors (ES = 0.70), elbow extensors (ES = 0.83) and shoulder extensors (ES = 0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivity of the two-point method for testing the maximal mechanical capacities was high for the knee, moderate for the hip and shoulder, and low for the elbow joint.

摘要

背景

等速测试已被常规用于评估个体肌肉群的能力。本研究旨在评估两点法评估的力点(F-v)关系的敏感性,以区分拮抗肌群和不同身体活动水平的男性。

方法

记录 27 名活跃男性和 13 名非活跃男性的膝关节、髋关节、肘关节和肩关节屈伸肌的向心力量输出,以确定 F-v 关系参数(最大力量 []、最大速度 [] 和最大功率 [P])。

结果

与拮抗肌相比,膝关节伸肌(效应大小 [ES] = 1.97 和 0.57)、髋关节伸肌(ES = 2.52 和 0.77)和肩关节屈肌(ES = 1.67 和 0.83)的 和 P 更高,而与膝关节伸肌相比,膝关节屈肌的 更高(ES = 0.59)。活跃男性的膝关节伸肌(ES = 0.72)和膝关节屈肌(ES = 0.83)的 更高,膝关节屈肌(ES = 0.70)、肘关节伸肌(ES = 0.83)和肩关节伸肌(ES = 0.36)的 P 更高。

结论

两点法测试最大机械能力的敏感性对于膝关节较高,对于髋关节和肩部为中等,对于肘关节较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1619/7699145/bed1acc224a6/ijerph-17-08570-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验