Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Nov;9(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000975.
In a low-resource and high-volume setting, it is often felt that patient care cannot be improved within the limitations of existing infrastructure and resources. However, the use of a systematic problem-solving method can bring about significant improvement even in these settings.
To decrease the mean waiting time from first visit to initiation of infertility treatment by 70% within 4 weeks (1-30 June 2019) for patients coming to the gynaecological outpatient department (OPD).
We constructed a multidisciplinary quality improvement team consisting of an academic consultant, a senior resident physician, a junior resident physician and a nurse to address the problem of long waiting times to initiation of fertility treatment. We collected baseline data from 10 consecutive women presenting to gynaecological OPD with complaints of infertility by calculating the time between their first visit to the facility and the day of performance of hysterosalpingography (HSG). The average waiting time was found to be 6 months and 25 days (mean=6.85 months; 3.5-10 months). The team used process flow diagrams and fishbone analysis to identify various causes of these long waiting times. The main reason for the delay in starting infertility treatment was that the date for HSG was given only after seeing the endometrial aspiration report (ie, after ruling out endometrial tuberculosis as there is a risk of dissemination of tuberculosis during HSG). Also, HSG was done only once a week during a short 2-hour slot in the fluoroscopy room.
After the implementation of change ideas, there was significant reduction in the waiting period to starting treatment in patients with infertility. After the first change idea, the average waiting period seen in 10 consecutive patients with infertility reduced to 3.25 months, that is, by 51.8% from baseline within a 2-week interval, and there is shift in the run chart diagram. After the second change idea, the waiting time reduced to 2 months, that is, by 70%, seen in the next 10 consecutive patients with infertility within the next 2 weeks' time. The results were sustained to the average waiting time of 2 months for 6 months without any additional resources.
With a well-organised and conducted quality improvement project and team efforts, the required changes can be brought about in an established conventional healthcare delivery system and improvements can be sustained over a long period of time.
在资源有限、工作量大的情况下,人们常常认为,在现有基础设施和资源的限制下,无法改善患者的护理水平。然而,即使在这种环境下,使用系统的问题解决方法也能带来显著的改善。
在 4 周内(2019 年 1 月 1 日至 30 日),将前来妇科门诊就诊的患者从首次就诊到开始不孕症治疗的平均等待时间缩短 70%。
我们组建了一个多学科质量改进团队,成员包括一名学术顾问、一名高级住院医师、一名初级住院医师和一名护士,旨在解决不孕症治疗开始前等待时间过长的问题。我们通过计算 10 名连续出现不孕症症状的女性从首次就诊到进行子宫输卵管造影术(HSG)当天的时间,收集了基线数据。平均等待时间为 6 个月零 25 天(平均值=6.85 个月;3.5-10 个月)。团队使用流程流程图和鱼骨图分析确定了这些长时间等待的各种原因。导致不孕症治疗开始延迟的主要原因是只有在看到子宫内膜抽吸报告后才给出 HSG 日期(即,在排除子宫内膜结核后,因为 HSG 期间存在结核病传播的风险)。此外,HSG 仅在放射科的 2 小时短时段内每周进行一次。
实施变更思路后,不孕症患者开始治疗的等待期显著缩短。在第一个变更思路实施后,10 名连续不孕症患者的平均等待期在两周内降至 3.25 个月,即与基线相比降低了 51.8%,运行图表也出现了变化。在第二个变更思路实施后,接下来的 10 名连续不孕症患者的等待时间在接下来的两周内降至 2 个月,即降低了 70%。在接下来的 6 个月内,无需额外资源即可将平均等待时间维持在 2 个月。
通过精心组织和实施的质量改进项目和团队努力,可以在既定的常规医疗保健提供系统中带来所需的变革,并在较长时间内保持改进。