Suppr超能文献

不同能量密度低水平激光疗法治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病患者的效果:平行随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Effects of different energy density low-level laser therapies for temporomandibular joint disorders patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of parallel randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Temporomandibular Joint and Occlusion, School/Hospital of Stomatology, Lanzhou University, Dong Gang Xi Road 199#, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China.

Department of Orthodontics, Xiangya Hospital and School of Stomatology, Central South University, Changsha, 410078, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Jul;36(5):1101-1108. doi: 10.1007/s10103-020-03197-7. Epub 2020 Nov 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the effects of different energy density LLLT on TMD patients' pain reduction.

METHODS

Reviewers searched RCTs published in Embase, PubMed and The Cochrane Library before 1 April 2020. Reviewers included parallelRCTs that compared the effects of LLLT with placebo or different energy density LLLT for TMD patients' pain reduction. Reviewers did network meta-analysis and evaluated the quality of evidence using the GRADE process.

RESULTS

From 352 studies, reviewers included 16 RCTs. Immediately after treatment, the d1 laser therapy (energy density ranging from 0 to 10 J/cm) ranked first. The d1 laser therapy showed more pain reduction than placebo ( MD = 2.49, 95% CI ranging from 1.28 to 3.71). The quality of "d1 vs p" comparison was assessed as "moderate" quality. A month after treatment, the d1 laser therapy also performed better than placebo (MD = 1.69, 95%CI = [-0.78, 4.16]). The quality of secondary outcome was assessed as "low" quality.

CONCLUSIONS

For clinical application, d1 laser therapy (energy density ranging from 0 to 10 J/cm) is recommended for short-term pain management of TMD patients (moderate quality evidence). A month after treatment, the d1 laser therapy also performed better than placebo and other laser groups but the result didn't reach the point of statistical significance (low quality evidence).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO-CRD42018118313.

摘要

目的

比较不同能量密度低水平激光疗法(LLLT)对颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)患者疼痛缓解的效果。

方法

检索员在 2020 年 4 月 1 日前在 Embase、PubMed 和 The Cochrane Library 中检索了发表的 RCT。检索员纳入了比较 LLLT 与安慰剂或不同能量密度 LLLT 对 TMD 患者疼痛缓解效果的平行 RCT。检索员进行网络荟萃分析,并使用 GRADE 过程评估证据质量。

结果

从 352 项研究中,检索员纳入了 16 项 RCT。治疗后即刻,d1 激光治疗(能量密度 0-10 J/cm)排名第一。d1 激光治疗较安慰剂显示出更大的疼痛缓解(MD=2.49,95%CI 为 1.28-3.71)。“d1 与 p”比较的质量被评估为“中等”质量。治疗后 1 个月,d1 激光治疗也优于安慰剂(MD=1.69,95%CI 为[-0.78,4.16])。次要结局的质量被评估为“低”质量。

结论

对于临床应用,推荐 d1 激光治疗(能量密度 0-10 J/cm)用于 TMD 患者的短期疼痛管理(中等质量证据)。治疗后 1 个月,d1 激光治疗也优于安慰剂和其他激光组,但结果未达到统计学意义(低质量证据)。

试验注册

PROSPERO-CRD42018118313。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验