Burke D A, Axon A T
Gastroenterology Unit, General Infirmary, Leeds.
J Clin Pathol. 1987 Dec;40(12):1402-4. doi: 10.1136/jcp.40.12.1402.
The two methods used to detect intestinal Escherichia coli in patients with ulcerative colitis, HeLa cell and buccal epithelial cell (BEC) adhesion assays, were compared. Both methods showed a significant difference between the adhesive property of colitic and control E coli: p less than 0.0002 and p less than 0.01 for the buccal epithelial cell and HeLa cell methods, respectively. HeLa cells did not detect all BEC positive isolates which were quantitatively more adhesive than any control isolate. All BEC negative isolates were HeLa cell negative. The BEC technique seems to be more sensitive for detecting adhesive E coli in ulcerative colitis because the true incidence of adhesive E coli in ulcerative colitis was higher than that determined by the HeLa cell method.
对用于检测溃疡性结肠炎患者肠道大肠杆菌的两种方法——HeLa细胞和颊上皮细胞(BEC)黏附试验进行了比较。两种方法均显示,结肠炎大肠杆菌与对照大肠杆菌的黏附特性存在显著差异:颊上皮细胞法和HeLa细胞法的p值分别小于0.0002和小于0.01。HeLa细胞未能检测出所有比任何对照菌株在数量上更具黏附性的BEC阳性分离株。所有BEC阴性分离株均为HeLa细胞阴性。BEC技术在检测溃疡性结肠炎中黏附性大肠杆菌方面似乎更敏感,因为溃疡性结肠炎中黏附性大肠杆菌的实际发生率高于HeLa细胞法所确定的发生率。