• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非相邻字母重复和正字法加工:通过重复或插入单词中的字母来判断非单词的词汇决策。

On non-adjacent letter repetition and orthographic processing: Lexical decisions to nonwords created by repeating or inserting letters in words.

机构信息

Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, CNRS, Aix-Marseille University, 3 place Victor Hugo, 13331, Marseille, France.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Apr;28(2):596-609. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01837-1. Epub 2020 Nov 24.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-020-01837-1
PMID:33236286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8062325/
Abstract

Informal observation suggests that it is harder to notice the spelling mistake in "silencne" than "silencre." This concurs with current evidence that non-adjacent letter repetition in correctly spelled words makes these words harder to recognize. One possible explanation is provided by open-bigram coding. Words containing repeated letters are harder to recognize because they are represented by fewer bigrams than words without repeated letters. Building on this particular explanation for letter-repetition effects in words, we predicted that nonwords in a lexical decision task should also be sensitive to letter repetitions. In particular, we examined two types of nonwords generated from the same baseword: (1) nonwords created by repeating one of the letters in the baseword (e.g., silence => silencne); and (2) nonwords created by inserting a letter that is not present in the baseword (e.g., silencre). According to open-bigram coding, nonwords created by repeating a letter are more similar to their baseword than nonwords created by inserting a letter, and this should make it harder to reject letter repetition nonwords than letter insertion nonwords. We put these predictions to test in one on-line pilot study (n=31), one laboratory experiment (n=36), and one follow-up on-line experiment (n=40) where we manipulated the distance between repetitions (one, two, three, or four letters). Participants found it harder to reject repetition nonwords than insertion nonwords, and this effect diminished with increasing distance.

摘要

非形式观察表明,“silencne”中的拼写错误比“silencre”中的拼写错误更难注意到。这与当前的证据一致,即在正确拼写的单词中,非相邻字母重复会使这些单词更难识别。开放双字母编码提供了一种可能的解释。包含重复字母的单词更难识别,因为它们的双字母表示比没有重复字母的单词少。基于这种对单词中字母重复效应的特殊解释,我们预测词汇判断任务中的非单词也应该对字母重复敏感。具体来说,我们检查了两种类型的从同一个基础词生成的非单词:(1)通过重复基础词中的一个字母生成的非单词(例如,silence => silencne);(2)通过插入基础词中不存在的字母生成的非单词(例如,silencre)。根据开放双字母编码,通过重复一个字母生成的非单词比通过插入一个字母生成的非单词更类似于其基础词,这应该使得更难以拒绝重复字母的非单词而不是插入字母的非单词。我们通过一个在线初步研究(n=31)、一个实验室实验(n=36)和一个后续在线实验(n=40)来检验这些预测,在这些实验中,我们操纵了重复字母之间的距离(一个、两个、三个或四个字母)。参与者发现,拒绝重复非单词比拒绝插入非单词更难,而且这种效应随着距离的增加而减弱。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/784e/8062325/528927069163/13423_2020_1837_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/784e/8062325/528927069163/13423_2020_1837_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/784e/8062325/528927069163/13423_2020_1837_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
On non-adjacent letter repetition and orthographic processing: Lexical decisions to nonwords created by repeating or inserting letters in words.非相邻字母重复和正字法加工:通过重复或插入单词中的字母来判断非单词的词汇决策。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Apr;28(2):596-609. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01837-1. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
2
Detection of intraword and interword letter repetition: a test of the word unitization hypothesis.词内和词间字母重复的检测:词单元化假设的一项测试。
Mem Cognit. 1989 Jan;17(1):48-57. doi: 10.3758/bf03199556.
3
Single Word Reading in the Real World: Effects of Transposed-Letters.现实世界中的单字阅读:错位字母的影响。
J Cogn. 2021 May 19;4(1):27. doi: 10.5334/joc.160.
4
Repeated letters increase the ambiguity of strings: Evidence from identification, priming and same-different tasks.重复字母增加了字符串的歧义性:来自识别、启动和异同任务的证据。
Cogn Psychol. 2022 Feb;132:101445. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101445. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
5
Transposed letter priming effects and allographic variation in Arabic: Insights from lexical decision and the same-different task.字母换位启动效应与阿拉伯语的异体字变异:来自词汇判断和同异任务的见解。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Jun;45(6):729-757. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000621.
6
Tests of a model of multi-word reading: effects of parafoveal flanking letters on foveal word recognition.多词阅读模型的测试:中央凹旁侧字母对中央凹单词识别的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Feb;146:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.014. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
7
Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a syllable level?字母换位相似性效应会在音节层面出现吗?
Exp Psychol. 2006;53(4):308-15. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.53.4.308.
8
Coordination of word recognition and oculomotor control during reading: the role of implicit lexical decisions.阅读过程中字词识别与眼球运动控制的协调:内隐词汇判断的作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Aug;39(4):1032-46. doi: 10.1037/a0030432. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
9
Lexical and sublexical processes in the perception of transposed-letter anagrams.变位词感知中的词汇和次词汇加工过程。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Mar;61(3):381-91. doi: 10.1080/17470210701664880.
10
What causes the greater perceived similarity of consonant-transposed nonwords?是什么导致了辅音换位非单词之间更大的感知相似性?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Mar;71(3):642-656. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1271444. Epub 2018 Jan 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Letters, Words, Sentences, and Reading.字母、单词、句子与阅读。
J Cogn. 2024 Aug 27;7(1):66. doi: 10.5334/joc.396. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Orthographic neighborhood density modulates the size of transposed-letter priming effects.正字法邻近密度调节转置字母启动效应的大小。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Oct;21(5):948-959. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00905-w. Epub 2021 May 6.
2
A delay in processing for repeated letters: Evidence from megastudies.信件重复处理延迟:来自大型研究的证据。
Cognition. 2019 Aug;189:227-241. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
3
OB1-reader: A model of word recognition and eye movements in text reading.阅读者 OB1:一种文本阅读中单词识别和眼球运动的模型。
Psychol Rev. 2018 Nov;125(6):969-984. doi: 10.1037/rev0000119. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
4
Orthographic processing: A 'mid-level' vision of reading: The 44th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture.正字法加工:阅读的一种“中级”视角:第44届弗雷德里克·巴特利特爵士讲座
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Feb;71(2):335-359. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1314515. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
5
The independence of letter identity and letter doubling in reading.阅读中字母识别与字母重复的独立性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):873-878. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1149-8.
6
The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2.词频对词汇判断时间的影响:来自荷兰词汇项目2的证据
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Mar;42(3):441-58. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000159. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
7
SUBTLEX-UK: a new and improved word frequency database for British English.SUBTLEX-UK:一个全新且经过改进的英式英语词汇频率数据库。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(6):1176-90. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.850521. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
8
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
9
Evidence for letter-specific position coding mechanisms.字母特异性位置编码机制的证据。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 2;8(7):e68460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068460. Print 2013.
10
Protein analysis meets visual word recognition: a case for string kernels in the brain.蛋白质分析与视觉词汇识别:大脑中的字符串核案例。
Cogn Sci. 2012 May-Jun;36(4):575-606. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01236.x. Epub 2012 Mar 20.