Physically Active Lifestyles Research Group (USQ PALs), Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Queensland, Australia.
Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Education, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 25;15(11):e0242220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242220. eCollection 2020.
Muscle-strengthening exercise (use of weight machines, free weights, push-ups, sit-ups), has multiple independent health benefits, and is a component of the Global physical activity guidelines. However, there is currently a lack of multi-country muscle-strengthening exercise prevalence studies. This study describes the prevalence and correlates of muscle-strengthening exercise across multiple European countries.
Data were drawn from the European Health Interview Survey Wave 2 (2013-14), which included nationally representative samples (n = 3,774-24,016) from 28 European countries. Muscle-strengthening exercise was assessed using the European Health Interview Survey Physical Activity Questionnaire. Population-weighted proportions were calculated for (1) "insufficient" (0-1 days/week) or (2) "sufficient" muscle-strengthening exercise (≥2 days/week). Prevalence ratios were calculated using multivariate Poisson regression for those reporting sufficient muscle-strengthening by country and by sociodemographic/lifestyle characteristics (sex, age, education, income, self-rated health etc.).
Data were available for 280,605 European adults aged ≥18 years. Overall, 17.3% (95% CI = 17.1%-17.5%) reported sufficient muscle-strengthening exercise (≥2 days/week). Muscle-strengthening exercise was geographically patterned with the lowest prevalence reported in South-eastern European countries (Romania, Malta and Cyprus: range: 0.7%-7.4%), and the highest prevalence in the Nordic countries (Iceland, Sweden, and Denmark: range: 34.1%-51.6%). Older age, insufficient aerobic activity, poorer self-rated health, lower income/education, being female, and being overweight/obese were significantly associated with lower likelihood of reporting sufficient muscle-strengthening exercise, independently of other characteristics.
Most European adults do not report sufficient muscle-strengthening exercise, and prevalence estimates varied considerably across countries. Low participation in muscle-strengthening exercise is widespread across Europe, and warrants public health attention.
肌肉强化运动(使用举重器材、自由重量、俯卧撑、仰卧起坐)具有多种独立的健康益处,是全球身体活动指南的组成部分。然而,目前缺乏多国家肌肉强化运动流行情况研究。本研究描述了多个欧洲国家的肌肉强化运动流行情况及其相关因素。
数据来自欧洲健康访谈调查第 2 波(2013-14 年),该调查包括来自 28 个欧洲国家的具有全国代表性的样本(n=3774-24016)。肌肉强化运动使用欧洲健康访谈调查体力活动问卷进行评估。根据(1)“不足”(每周 0-1 天)或(2)“充足”(每周≥2 天)计算人口加权比例。使用多元泊松回归计算按国家和按社会人口统计学/生活方式特征(性别、年龄、教育、收入、自我评估健康等)报告充足肌肉强化运动的流行比。
280605 名年龄≥18 岁的欧洲成年人的数据可用。总体而言,17.3%(95%置信区间[CI]:17.1%-17.5%)报告有足够的肌肉强化运动(每周≥2 天)。肌肉强化运动具有地域模式,在东南欧国家(罗马尼亚、马耳他和塞浦路斯:范围:0.7%-7.4%)报告的流行率最低,在北欧国家(冰岛、瑞典和丹麦:范围:34.1%-51.6%)报告的流行率最高。年龄较大、有氧运动不足、自我评估健康状况较差、收入/教育水平较低、女性以及超重/肥胖与报告有足够肌肉强化运动的可能性较低显著相关,独立于其他特征。
大多数欧洲成年人没有报告足够的肌肉强化运动,而且各国的流行率估计差异很大。欧洲各地普遍存在肌肉强化运动参与率低的问题,值得引起公共卫生关注。