Haller Simone P, Stoddard Joel, Pagliaccio David, Bui Hong, MacGillivray Caroline, Jones Matt, Brotman Melissa A
National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
University of Colorado, Aurora.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 May;60(5):637-645. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.08.468. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
Computational models provide information about cognitive components underlying behavior. When applied to psychopathology-relevant processes, they offer additional insight to observed differences in behavioral performance. Drift diffusion models have been successfully applied to investigate processing efficiency during binary choice tasks. Using these models, we examine the association between psychopathology (irritability and inattention/hyperactivity) and processing efficiency under different attentional demands.
A total of 187 youths with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD), both disorders, or no major psychopathology (age, mean ± SD, 13.09 ± 2.55 y, 34% female) completed an Eriksen Flanker task. Of these, 87 youths provided complete data on dimensional measures of the core symptom of DMDD (irritability) and those of ADHD (inattention and hyperactivity).
In a categorical diagnosis-based analysis (n = 187), we found significant interactive effects among ADHD, DMDD, and task condition on processing efficiency, whereby changes in processing efficiency between conflict and nonconflict conditions were larger in youths without psychopathology compared with patients. Analysis of symptom severity (n = 87) across diagnoses similarly revealed an interaction between symptom dimensions and task condition on processing efficiency. Irritability moderated the magnitude of association between inattention symptoms and difference in processing efficiency between conflict and nonconflict conditions.
Adapting processing efficiency to cognitive demands may represent a shared cognitive endophenotype for both ADHD and DMDD. Highly irritable and/or inattentive youth may have difficulty adjusting processing efficiency to changing task demands, possibly reflecting impairments in cognitive flexibility.
计算模型可提供有关行为背后认知成分的信息。当应用于与精神病理学相关的过程时,它们能为观察到的行为表现差异提供更多见解。漂移扩散模型已成功应用于研究二选一任务中的处理效率。利用这些模型,我们考察了精神病理学(易怒和注意力不集中/多动)与不同注意力需求下的处理效率之间的关联。
共有187名患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)、破坏性行为障碍(DMDD)、两种障碍或无主要精神病理学问题的青少年(年龄,均值±标准差,13.09±2.55岁,34%为女性)完成了一项埃里克森侧翼任务。其中,87名青少年提供了关于DMDD核心症状(易怒)以及ADHD核心症状(注意力不集中和多动)的维度测量的完整数据。
在基于分类诊断的分析(n = 187)中,我们发现ADHD、DMDD和任务条件之间在处理效率上存在显著的交互作用,即与患者相比,无精神病理学问题的青少年在冲突和非冲突条件之间的处理效率变化更大。跨诊断的症状严重程度分析(n = 87)同样显示,症状维度与任务条件在处理效率上存在交互作用。易怒调节了注意力不集中症状与冲突和非冲突条件之间处理效率差异的关联程度。
使处理效率适应认知需求可能是ADHD和DMDD共同的认知内表型。高度易怒和/或注意力不集中的青少年可能难以根据不断变化的任务需求调整处理效率,这可能反映了认知灵活性的损害。