• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Computational Modeling of Attentional Impairments in Disruptive Mood Dysregulation and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.破坏性行为障碍和注意力缺陷多动障碍中注意力损伤的计算模型
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 May;60(5):637-645. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.08.468. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
2
Executive function in children with disruptive mood dysregulation disorder compared to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and oppositional defiant disorder, and in children with different irritability levels.与注意缺陷/多动障碍和对立违抗障碍相比,具有破坏性情绪失调障碍的儿童的执行功能,以及不同激惹水平的儿童的执行功能。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Jan;33(1):115-125. doi: 10.1007/s00787-023-02143-6. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
3
Behavioral and Neural Sustained Attention Deficits in Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.破坏性行为障碍和注意缺陷多动障碍中的行为及神经持续性注意力缺陷
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 May;56(5):426-435. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
4
Improvements in Irritability with Open-Label Methylphenidate Treatment in Youth with Comorbid Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder.开放标签哌甲酯治疗共患注意力缺陷/多动障碍和破坏性心境失调障碍的青少年的易激惹改善情况。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2018 Jun;28(5):298-305. doi: 10.1089/cap.2017.0124. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
5
Aripiprazole/Methylphenidate Combination in Children and Adolescents with Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: An Open-Label Study.阿立哌唑/哌甲酯联合治疗儿童和青少年破坏性心境失调障碍及注意力缺陷/多动障碍:一项开放标签研究。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2018 Dec;28(10):682-689. doi: 10.1089/cap.2018.0068. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
6
Persistence of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.注意缺陷/多动障碍患儿中破坏性心境失调障碍的持续存在。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Jan 1;278:502-505. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.109. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
7
Modeling Shared and Specific Variances of Irritability, Inattention, and Hyperactivity Yields Novel Insights Into White Matter Perturbations.对易怒、注意力不集中和多动的共享及特定方差进行建模,为白质扰动带来了新见解。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Dec;63(12):1239-1250. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2024.02.010. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
8
Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder in a Community Mental Health Clinic: Prevalence, Comorbidity and Correlates.社区心理健康诊所中的破坏性情绪失调障碍:患病率、共病情况及相关因素
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016 Mar;26(2):123-30. doi: 10.1089/cap.2015.0061. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
9
Editorial: Defining the Clinical Boundary of Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder Symptoms in Youth.社论:定义青少年中破坏性心境失调障碍症状的临床界限。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;60(2):216-218. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.12.019. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
10
Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder Symptoms and Association with Oppositional Defiant and Other Disorders in a General Population Child Sample.破坏性行为障碍症状及其与一般人群儿童样本中对立违抗障碍和其他障碍的关联。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016 Mar;26(2):101-6. doi: 10.1089/cap.2015.0074. Epub 2016 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Annual Research Review: What processes are dysregulated among emotionally dysregulated youth? - a systematic review.年度研究综述:情绪调节失调的青少年中哪些过程失调?——一项系统综述。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;66(4):516-546. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.14126. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
2
Psychometrics of drift-diffusion model parameters derived from the Eriksen flanker task: Reliability and validity in two independent samples.源自埃里克森侧翼任务的漂移扩散模型参数的心理测量学:两个独立样本中的信度和效度
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Apr;25(2):311-328. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01222-8. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
3
Understanding irritability through the lens of self-regulatory control processes in children and adolescents: a systematic review.从儿童和青少年自我调节控制过程的角度理解易怒情绪:一项系统综述。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 May;34(5):1497-1509. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02591-8. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
4
Neurocognitive and adaptive phenotypes in adolescent inpatients with mood disorders: an exploratory study on disruptive mood dysregulation disorder in the framework of depressive disorders.青少年情绪障碍住院患者的神经认知和适应性表型:在抑郁症框架内对破坏性心境失调障碍的一项探索性研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 27;14:1253589. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1253589. eCollection 2023.
5
Evidence Accumulation and Neural Correlates of Uncertainty in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.强迫症中不确定性的证据积累和神经相关物。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2023 Oct;8(10):1058-1065. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2023.05.011. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
6
The Impact of Irritability and Callous Unemotional Traits on Reward Positivity in Youth with ADHD and Conduct Problems.易激惹和冷酷无情特质对 ADHD 伴品行问题青少年奖赏正性的影响。
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2022 Aug;50(8):1027-1040. doi: 10.1007/s10802-022-00901-9. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
7
Diagnostic instruments for the assessment of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder: a systematic review of the literature.用于评估破坏性心境失调障碍的诊断工具:文献系统综述。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;32(1):17-39. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01840-4. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
8
Rationale and validation of a novel mobile application probing motor inhibition: Proof of concept of CALM-IT.一种新型移动应用探测运动抑制的原理和验证:CALM-IT 的概念验证。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 4;16(6):e0252245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252245. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Anxiety and Stress Alter Decision-Making Dynamics and Causal Amygdala-Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Circuits During Emotion Regulation in Children.焦虑和压力会改变儿童情绪调节过程中的决策动力学和杏仁核-背外侧前额叶皮质的因果关系回路。
Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 1;88(7):576-586. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
2
Approaches to Analysis in Model-based Cognitive Neuroscience.基于模型的认知神经科学中的分析方法。
J Math Psychol. 2017 Feb;76(B):65-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
3
Dissecting the impact of depression on decision-making.剖析抑郁对决策的影响。
Psychol Med. 2020 Jul;50(10):1613-1622. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719001570. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
4
Exposure therapy for pediatric irritability: Theory and potential mechanisms.儿童烦躁的暴露疗法:理论与潜在机制。
Behav Res Ther. 2019 Jul;118:141-149. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
5
Bridging Neural and Computational Viewpoints on Perceptual Decision-Making.桥接关于感知决策的神经和计算观点。
Trends Neurosci. 2018 Nov;41(11):838-852. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
6
Behavioral and Neural Sustained Attention Deficits in Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.破坏性行为障碍和注意缺陷多动障碍中的行为及神经持续性注意力缺陷
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 May;56(5):426-435. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
7
Empirically derived patterns of psychiatric symptoms in youth: A latent profile analysis.青少年精神症状的实证模式:一项潜在剖面分析。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jul;216:109-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.016. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
8
Modelling ADHD: A review of ADHD theories through their predictions for computational models of decision-making and reinforcement learning.建模 ADHD:通过对决策和强化学习计算模型的预测,对 ADHD 理论的综述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Dec;71:633-656. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
9
Using the Diffusion Model to Explain Cognitive Deficits in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.使用扩散模型解释注意力缺陷多动障碍中的认知缺陷。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2017 Jan;45(1):57-68. doi: 10.1007/s10802-016-0151-y.
10
Neural Correlates of Irritability in Disruptive Mood Dysregulation and Bipolar Disorders.破坏性行为障碍和双相情感障碍中易怒情绪的神经关联
Am J Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 1;173(7):722-30. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15060833. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

破坏性行为障碍和注意力缺陷多动障碍中注意力损伤的计算模型

Computational Modeling of Attentional Impairments in Disruptive Mood Dysregulation and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

作者信息

Haller Simone P, Stoddard Joel, Pagliaccio David, Bui Hong, MacGillivray Caroline, Jones Matt, Brotman Melissa A

机构信息

National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

University of Colorado, Aurora.

出版信息

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 May;60(5):637-645. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.08.468. Epub 2020 Nov 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaac.2020.08.468
PMID:33242544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8096646/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Computational models provide information about cognitive components underlying behavior. When applied to psychopathology-relevant processes, they offer additional insight to observed differences in behavioral performance. Drift diffusion models have been successfully applied to investigate processing efficiency during binary choice tasks. Using these models, we examine the association between psychopathology (irritability and inattention/hyperactivity) and processing efficiency under different attentional demands.

METHOD

A total of 187 youths with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD), both disorders, or no major psychopathology (age, mean ± SD, 13.09 ± 2.55 y, 34% female) completed an Eriksen Flanker task. Of these, 87 youths provided complete data on dimensional measures of the core symptom of DMDD (irritability) and those of ADHD (inattention and hyperactivity).

RESULTS

In a categorical diagnosis-based analysis (n = 187), we found significant interactive effects among ADHD, DMDD, and task condition on processing efficiency, whereby changes in processing efficiency between conflict and nonconflict conditions were larger in youths without psychopathology compared with patients. Analysis of symptom severity (n = 87) across diagnoses similarly revealed an interaction between symptom dimensions and task condition on processing efficiency. Irritability moderated the magnitude of association between inattention symptoms and difference in processing efficiency between conflict and nonconflict conditions.

CONCLUSION

Adapting processing efficiency to cognitive demands may represent a shared cognitive endophenotype for both ADHD and DMDD. Highly irritable and/or inattentive youth may have difficulty adjusting processing efficiency to changing task demands, possibly reflecting impairments in cognitive flexibility.

摘要

目的

计算模型可提供有关行为背后认知成分的信息。当应用于与精神病理学相关的过程时,它们能为观察到的行为表现差异提供更多见解。漂移扩散模型已成功应用于研究二选一任务中的处理效率。利用这些模型,我们考察了精神病理学(易怒和注意力不集中/多动)与不同注意力需求下的处理效率之间的关联。

方法

共有187名患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)、破坏性行为障碍(DMDD)、两种障碍或无主要精神病理学问题的青少年(年龄,均值±标准差,13.09±2.55岁,34%为女性)完成了一项埃里克森侧翼任务。其中,87名青少年提供了关于DMDD核心症状(易怒)以及ADHD核心症状(注意力不集中和多动)的维度测量的完整数据。

结果

在基于分类诊断的分析(n = 187)中,我们发现ADHD、DMDD和任务条件之间在处理效率上存在显著的交互作用,即与患者相比,无精神病理学问题的青少年在冲突和非冲突条件之间的处理效率变化更大。跨诊断的症状严重程度分析(n = 87)同样显示,症状维度与任务条件在处理效率上存在交互作用。易怒调节了注意力不集中症状与冲突和非冲突条件之间处理效率差异的关联程度。

结论

使处理效率适应认知需求可能是ADHD和DMDD共同的认知内表型。高度易怒和/或注意力不集中的青少年可能难以根据不断变化的任务需求调整处理效率,这可能反映了认知灵活性的损害。