• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一种多成分干预措施,以促进黑人和拉丁裔个体参与生物医学研究。

Development of a multi-component intervention to promote participation of Black and Latinx individuals in biomedical research.

作者信息

Danila Maria I, Allison Jeroan J, Goins Karin Valentine, Chiriboga Germán, Fischer Melissa, Puliafico Melissa, Mudano Amy S, Rahn Elizabeth J, Merchant Jeanne, Lawrence Colleen E, Dunkel Leah, Israel Tiffany, Barton Bruce, Jenoure Fred, Alexander Tiffany, Cruz Danny, Douglas Marva, Sims Jacqueline, Richmond Al, Roberson Erik D, Chambless Carol, Harris Paul A, Saag Kenneth G, Lemon Stephenie C

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology/Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.

University of Alabama at Birmingham Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jun 14;5(1):e134. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.797. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2021.797
PMID:34367678
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8327553/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Barriers to research participation by racial and ethnic minority group members are multi-factorial, stem from historical social injustices and occur at participant, research team, and research process levels. The informed consent procedure is a key component of the research process and represents an opportunity to address these barriers. This manuscript describes the development of the Strengthening Translational Research in Diverse Enrollment (STRIDE) intervention, which aims to improve research participation by individuals from underrepresented groups.

METHODS

We used a community-engaged approach to develop an integrated, culturally, and literacy-sensitive, multi-component intervention that addresses barriers to research participation during the informed consent process. This approach involved having Community Investigators participate in intervention development activities and using community engagement studios and other methods to get feedback from community members on intervention components.

RESULTS

The STRIDE intervention has three components: a simulation-based training program directed toward clinical study research assistants that emphasizes cultural competency and communication skills for assisting in the informed consent process, an electronic consent (eConsent) framework designed to improve health-related research material comprehension and relevance, and a "storytelling" intervention in which prior research participants from diverse backgrounds share their experiences delivered via video vignettes during the consent process.

CONCLUSIONS

The community engaged development approach resulted in a multi-component intervention that addresses known barriers to research participation and can be integrated into the consent process of research studies. Results of an ongoing study will determine its effectiveness at increasing diversity among research participants.

摘要

引言

种族和少数族裔群体成员参与研究存在多方面障碍,这些障碍源于历史上的社会不公,在参与者、研究团队和研究过程层面均有出现。知情同意程序是研究过程的关键组成部分,也是解决这些障碍的契机。本手稿描述了加强多样化入组转化研究(STRIDE)干预措施的开发过程,该干预措施旨在提高代表性不足群体个体的研究参与度。

方法

我们采用社区参与的方法来开发一种综合的干预措施,该措施对文化和读写能力敏感,由多个部分组成,旨在解决知情同意过程中研究参与的障碍。这种方法包括让社区调查员参与干预措施开发活动,并利用社区参与工作室及其他方法获取社区成员对干预措施各部分的反馈。

结果

STRIDE干预措施有三个组成部分:针对临床研究助理的基于模拟的培训项目,该项目强调在协助知情同意过程中的文化能力和沟通技巧;一个旨在提高与健康相关研究材料理解度和相关性的电子同意(eConsent)框架;以及一种“故事讲述”干预措施,即来自不同背景的先前研究参与者在同意过程中通过视频短片分享他们的经历。

结论

社区参与的开发方法产生了一种多部分干预措施,该措施解决了已知的研究参与障碍,并可纳入研究的同意过程。一项正在进行的研究结果将确定其在增加研究参与者多样性方面的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0d0/8327553/55469a753567/S2059866121007974_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0d0/8327553/55469a753567/S2059866121007974_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0d0/8327553/55469a753567/S2059866121007974_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a multi-component intervention to promote participation of Black and Latinx individuals in biomedical research.开发一种多成分干预措施,以促进黑人和拉丁裔个体参与生物医学研究。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jun 14;5(1):e134. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.797. eCollection 2021.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Adapting the QuinteT recruitment intervention (QRI) to optimize the recruitment of ethnic minority groups in clinical trials: insights from workshops with diverse public contributors.调整昆特招募干预措施(QRI)以优化临床试验中少数族裔群体的招募:来自与不同公众参与者举办的研讨会的见解。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Aug 5;186:111922. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111922.
4
MarkVCID cerebral small vessel consortium: I. Enrollment, clinical, fluid protocols.马克 VCID 脑小血管联盟:一、入组、临床、液体方案。
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Apr;17(4):704-715. doi: 10.1002/alz.12215. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
7
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
8
Developing evidence-based guidelines for describing potential benefits and harms within patient information leaflets/sheets (PILs) that inform and do not cause harm (PrinciPILs).制定基于证据的指南,用于在患者信息单页/说明书(PrinciPILs)中描述潜在益处和危害,这些信息单页既能提供信息又不会造成伤害。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(43):1-20. doi: 10.3310/GJJH2402.
9
'Some parts of the consent form are written using complex scientific language': community perspectives on informed consent for research with pregnant and lactating mothers in Uganda.“同意书中的某些部分使用了复杂的科学语言”:乌干达关于孕妇和哺乳期母亲参与研究的知情同意的社区观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01147-4.
10
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions to Improve COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy.干预措施以改善对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫态度。
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2025 Feb;51(1):61-73. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2024.09.007. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
2
Enablers and barriers to engaging under-served groups in research: Survey of the United Kingdom research professional's views.让服务不足群体参与研究的促进因素和障碍:对英国研究专业人员观点的调查
NIHR Open Res. 2023 Dec 18;3:37. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13434.2. eCollection 2023.
3
Engagement with health research summaries via digital communication to All of Us participants.

本文引用的文献

1
A REDCap-based model for electronic consent (eConsent): Moving toward a more personalized consent.一种基于REDCap的电子同意书(eConsent)模型:迈向更个性化的同意书。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Apr 3;4(4):345-353. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.30.
2
Enhancing translational researchers' ability to collaborate with community stakeholders: Lessons from the Community Engagement Studio.提高转化研究人员与社区利益相关者合作的能力:来自社区参与工作室的经验教训。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Aug;2(4):201-207. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.323. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
3
Culturally adaptive storytelling intervention versus didactic intervention to improve hypertension control in Vietnam- 12 month follow up results: A cluster randomized controlled feasibility trial.
通过数字通信与“我们所有人”项目的参与者分享健康研究摘要。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Dec 1;31(12):2908-2915. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae185.
4
A multi-step approach to develop a "storytelling" intervention to improve patient gout knowledge and improve outpatient follow-up.一种多步骤方法,用于开发一种“讲故事”干预措施,以提高患者对痛风的认知并改善门诊随访情况。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 May 19;33:101149. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101149. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Community-engaged training in informed consent.社区参与的知情同意培训。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Apr 20;7(1):e108. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.534. eCollection 2023.
文化适应叙事干预与说教式干预对改善越南高血压控制的比较:一项为期 12 个月的随访结果的集群随机对照可行性试验。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 31;13(12):e0209912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209912. eCollection 2018.
4
An Innovative Simulation-based Community-engaged Intervention for Training Research Assistants in Culturally Appropriate Informed Consent.一种基于创新模拟的社区参与式干预措施,用于培训研究助理进行符合文化适宜性的知情同意。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(3):247-262. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0049.
5
Seeing Beyond the Margins: Challenges to Informed Inclusion of Vulnerable Populations in Research.超越边缘:在研究中切实纳入弱势群体面临的挑战
J Law Med Ethics. 2018 Mar;46(1):30-43. doi: 10.1177/1073110518766006. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
6
A pragmatic randomized trial comparing tablet computer informed consent to traditional paper-based methods for an osteoporosis study.一项比较平板电脑知情同意书与传统纸质方法用于骨质疏松症研究的实用性随机试验。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Feb 17;3:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.02.003. eCollection 2016 Aug 15.
7
African American Veterans Storytelling: A Multisite Randomized Trial to Improve Hypertension.非裔美国退伍军人故事讲述:一项改善高血压的多中心随机试验。
Med Care. 2017 Sep;55 Suppl 9 Suppl 2:S50-S58. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000766.
8
Informed Consent.知情同意书
N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 2;376(9):856-867. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1603773.
9
The Common Rule, Updated.《通用规则》更新版
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):613-615. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1700736. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
10
Psychometric Development of the Research and Knowledge Scale.研究与知识量表的心理测量学发展
Med Care. 2017 Feb;55(2):117-124. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000629.