Pan Zihan, Dickens Andrew P, Chi Chunhua, Kong Xia, Enocson Alexandra, Adab Peymane, Cheng Kar Keung, Sitch Alice J, Jowett Sue, Jordan Rachel
Department of General Practice, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 27;10(11):e035738. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035738.
The latest chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) epidemiology survey in China estimated that there were 99 million potential COPD patients in the country, the majority of whom are undiagnosed. Screening for COPD in primary care settings is of vital importance for China, but it is not known which strategy would be the most suitable for adoption in primary care. Studies have been conducted to test the accuracy of questionnaires, expiratory peak flow meters and microspirometers to screen for COPD, but no study has directly evaluated and compared the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these methods in the Chinese setting.
We present the protocol for a multicentre cross-sectional study, to be conducted in eight community hospitals from four cities among Chinese adults aged 40 years or older to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different case-finding methods for COPD, and determine the test performance of individual and combinations of screening tests and strategies in comparison with quality diagnostic spirometry. Index tests are screening questionnaires (COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ), COPD Assessment in Primary Care To Identify Undiagnosed Respiratory Disease and Exacerbation Risk Questionnaire (CAPTURE), symptom-based questionnaire, COPD Screening Questionnaire (COPD-SQ)), microspirometer and peak flow. Each participant will complete all of these tests in one assessment. The primary analysis will compare the performance of a screening questionnaire with a handheld device. Secondary analyses will include the comparative performance of each index test, as well as a comparison of strategies where we use a screening questionnaire and a handheld device. Approximately 2000 participants will be recruited over 9 to 12 months.
The study has been approved by Peking University Hospital and University of Birmingham. All study participants will provide written informed consent. Study results will be published in appropriate journal and presented at national and international conferences, as well as relevant social media and various community/stakeholder engagement activities.
ISRCTN13357135.
中国最新的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)流行病学调查估计,该国潜在的COPD患者有9900万,其中大多数未被诊断出来。在基层医疗环境中筛查COPD对中国至关重要,但尚不清楚哪种策略最适合在基层医疗中采用。已有研究测试了问卷、呼气峰值流量计和微型肺活量计筛查COPD的准确性,但尚无研究直接评估和比较这些方法在中国背景下的有效性和成本效益。
我们介绍一项多中心横断面研究的方案,该研究将在中国四个城市的八家社区医院对40岁及以上的成年人进行,以调查不同COPD病例发现方法的有效性和成本效益,并确定与高质量诊断性肺功能测定相比,个体筛查测试及组合和策略的测试性能。指标测试包括筛查问卷(COPD诊断问卷(CDQ)、基层医疗中识别未诊断呼吸系统疾病和加重风险问卷(CAPTURE)、基于症状的问卷、COPD筛查问卷(COPD-SQ))、微型肺活量计和峰值流量。每位参与者将在一次评估中完成所有这些测试。主要分析将比较筛查问卷与手持设备的性能。次要分析将包括每个指标测试的比较性能,以及我们使用筛查问卷和手持设备的策略比较。将在9至12个月内招募约2000名参与者。
该研究已获得北京大学医院和伯明翰大学批准。所有研究参与者将提供书面知情同意书。研究结果将发表在适当的期刊上,并在国内和国际会议以及相关社交媒体和各种社区/利益相关者参与活动中展示。
ISRCTN13357135