Bernstein H, Hopf F A, Michod R E
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson 85724.
Adv Genet. 1987;24:323-70. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2660(08)60012-7.
Traditionally, sexual reproduction has been explained as an adaptation for producing genetic variation through allelic recombination. Serious difficulties with this explanation have led many workers to conclude that the benefit of sex is a major unsolved problem in evolutionary biology. A recent informational approach to this problem has led to the view that the two fundamental aspects of sex, recombination and outcrossing, are adaptive responses to the two major sources of noise in transmitting genetic information, DNA damage and replication errors. We refer to this view as the repair hypothesis, to distinguish it from the traditional variation hypothesis. On the repair hypothesis, recombination is a process for repairing damaged DNA. In dealing with damage, recombination produces a form of informational noise, allelic recombination, as a by-product. Recombinational repair is the only repair process known which can overcome double-strand damages in DNA, and such damages are common in nature. Recombinational repair is prevalent from the simplest to the most complex organisms. It is effective against many different types of DNA-damaging agents, and, in particular, is highly efficient in overcoming double-strand damages. Current understanding of the mechanisms of recombination during meiosis suggests that meiosis is designed for repairing DNA. These considerations form the basis for the first part of the repair hypothesis, that recombination is an adaptation for dealing with DNA damage. The evolution of sex can be viewed as a continuum on the repair hypothesis. Sex is presumed to have arisen in primitive RNA-containing protocells whose sexual process was similar to that of recombinational repair in extent segmented, single-stranded RNA viruses, which are among the simplest known organisms. Although this early form of repair occurred by nonenzymatic reassortment of replicas of undamaged RNA segments, it evolved into enzyme-mediated breakage and exchange between long DNA molecules. As some lines of descent became more complex, their genome information increased, leading to increased vulnerability to mutation. The diploid stage of the sexual cycle, which was at first transient, became the predominant stage in some lines of descent because it allowed complementation, the masking of deleterious recessive mutations. Out-crossing, the second fundamental aspect of sex, is also maintained by the advantage of masking mutations. However, outcrossing can be abandoned in favor of parthenogenesis or selfing under conditions in which the costs of mating are very high.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
传统上,有性生殖被解释为一种通过等位基因重组产生遗传变异的适应方式。这种解释存在的严重困难使得许多研究者得出结论,即性的益处是进化生物学中一个主要的未解难题。最近针对这个问题的一种信息学方法提出了这样一种观点:性的两个基本方面,即重组和异交,是对遗传信息传递过程中两种主要噪声来源——DNA损伤和复制错误——的适应性反应。我们将这种观点称为修复假说,以区别于传统的变异假说。根据修复假说,重组是修复受损DNA的过程。在处理损伤时,重组会产生一种信息噪声形式,即等位基因重组,作为副产品。重组修复是已知的唯一能够克服DNA双链损伤的修复过程,而这种损伤在自然界中很常见。重组修复在从最简单到最复杂的生物体中都普遍存在。它对许多不同类型的DNA损伤剂都有效,尤其在克服双链损伤方面效率极高。目前对减数分裂过程中重组机制的理解表明,减数分裂是为修复DNA而设计的。这些考量构成了修复假说第一部分的基础,即重组是应对DNA损伤的一种适应方式。从修复假说的角度来看,性的进化可以被视为一个连续统一体。性被推测起源于原始的含RNA原细胞,其有性过程在程度上类似于片段化的单链RNA病毒中的重组修复,而这些病毒是已知最简单的生物体之一。尽管这种早期的修复形式是通过未受损RNA片段的副本进行非酶促重排发生的,但它后来进化为酶介导的长DNA分子之间的断裂和交换。随着一些谱系变得更加复杂,它们的基因组信息增加,导致对突变的易感性增强。有性生殖周期中的二倍体阶段最初是短暂的,但在一些谱系中成为了主要阶段,因为它允许互补,即掩盖有害的隐性突变。异交,即性的第二个基本方面,也通过掩盖突变的优势得以维持。然而,在交配成本非常高的情况下,异交可以被放弃,转而采用孤雌生殖或自交。(摘要截选至400字)