• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头颈部鳞状细胞癌中使用 F-FDG-PET 和 MRI 同时评估转移淋巴结。

Assessment of metastatic lymph nodes in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas using simultaneous F-FDG-PET and MRI.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Center for Biomedical Imaging (CBI), Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University School of Medicine, 660 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 27;10(1):20764. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77740-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-77740-5
PMID:33247166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7695736/
Abstract

In this study, we investigate the feasibility of using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cases. Twenty HNSCC patients scheduled for lymph node dissection underwent DCE-MRI, dynamic PET, and DWI using a PET-MR scanner within one week prior to their planned surgery. During surgery, resected nodes were labeled to identify their nodal levels and sent for routine clinical pathology evaluation. Quantitative parameters of metastatic and normal nodes were calculated from DCE-MRI (v, v, PS, F, K), DWI (ADC) and PET (K, K, k, k) to assess if an individual or a combination of parameters can classify normal and metastatic lymph nodes accurately. There were 38 normal and 11 metastatic nodes covered by all three imaging methods and confirmed by pathology. 34% of all normal nodes had volumes greater than or equal to the smallest metastatic node while 4 normal nodes had SUV > 4.5. Among the MRI parameters, the median v, F, PS, and K values of the metastatic lymph nodes were significantly lower (p = <0.05) than those of normal nodes. v and ADC did not show any statistical significance. For the dynamic PET parameters, the metastatic nodes had significantly higher k (p value = 8.8 × 10) and K (p value = 5.3 × 10) than normal nodes. K and k did not show any statistically significant difference. K had the best separation with accuracy = 0.96 (sensitivity = 1, specificity = 0.95) using a cutoff of K = 5.3 × 10 mL/cm/min, while k and volume had accuracy of 0.94 (sensitivity = 0.82, specificity = 0.97) and 0.90 (sensitivity = 0.64, specificity = 0.97) respectively. 100% accuracy can be achieved using a multivariate logistic regression model of MRI parameters after thresholding the data with K < 5.3 × 10 mL/cm/min. The results of this preliminary study suggest that quantitative MRI may provide additional value in distinguishing metastatic nodes, particularly among small nodes, when used together with FDG-PET.

摘要

在这项研究中,我们研究了使用动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)、扩散加权成像(DWI)和正电子发射断层扫描(PET)检测头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者转移淋巴结的可行性。20 例 HNSCC 患者在计划手术前一周内使用 PET-MR 扫描仪进行 DCE-MRI、动态 PET 和 DWI 检查。在手术过程中,切除的淋巴结被标记以识别其淋巴结水平,并送常规临床病理评估。从 DCE-MRI(v、v、PS、F、K)、DWI(ADC)和 PET(K、K、k、k)中计算转移和正常淋巴结的定量参数,以评估单个或多个参数是否可以准确分类正常和转移淋巴结。所有三种成像方法均覆盖了 38 个正常淋巴结和 11 个转移性淋巴结,并通过病理证实。所有正常淋巴结中有 34%的体积大于或等于最小的转移性淋巴结,而 4 个正常淋巴结的 SUV 值大于 4.5。在 MRI 参数中,转移性淋巴结的中位 v、F、PS 和 K 值明显低于正常淋巴结(p 值均小于 0.05)。v 和 ADC 没有显示出任何统计学意义。对于动态 PET 参数,转移性淋巴结的 k 值(p 值=8.8×10)和 K 值(p 值=5.3×10)明显高于正常淋巴结。K 和 k 没有显示出任何统计学差异。K 的最佳分离精度为 0.96(灵敏度=1,特异性=0.95),K 的截断值为 K=5.3×10 mL/cm/min,而 k 和体积的精度分别为 0.94(灵敏度=0.82,特异性=0.97)和 0.90(灵敏度=0.64,特异性=0.97)。使用经过 K < 5.3×10 mL/cm/min 数据阈值处理后的 MRI 参数的多元逻辑回归模型,可实现 100%的准确率。这项初步研究的结果表明,当与 FDG-PET 联合使用时,定量 MRI 可能为区分转移性淋巴结,特别是小淋巴结提供额外的价值。

相似文献

1
Assessment of metastatic lymph nodes in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas using simultaneous F-FDG-PET and MRI.头颈部鳞状细胞癌中使用 F-FDG-PET 和 MRI 同时评估转移淋巴结。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 27;10(1):20764. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77740-5.
2
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) derived from PET/MRI for lymph node assessment in patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC).正电子发射断层扫描/磁共振成像(PET/MRI)弥散加权成像(DWI)用于头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者的淋巴结评估。
Cancer Imaging. 2020 Aug 8;20(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s40644-020-00334-x.
3
Noninvasive assessment of tumor microenvironment using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography imaging in neck nodal metastases.使用动态对比增强磁共振成像和18F-氟米索硝唑正电子发射断层扫描成像对颈部淋巴结转移瘤的肿瘤微环境进行无创评估。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Aug 1;77(5):1403-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.009. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
4
[F]FDG PET/MRI versus contrast-enhanced MRI in detecting regional HNSCC metastases.[F]FDG PET/MRI 与对比增强 MRI 检测头颈部鳞状细胞癌局部转移的比较。
Ann Nucl Med. 2021 Feb;35(2):260-269. doi: 10.1007/s12149-020-01565-5. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
5
Multiparametric functional MRI and F-FDG-PET for survival prediction in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with (chemo)radiation.多参数功能磁共振成像和 F-FDG-PET 预测头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者接受(放)化疗的生存情况。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Feb;31(2):616-628. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07163-3. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
6
Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging and F-FDG-PET/CT for the detection of unknown primary head and neck cancer in patients presenting with cervical metastasis.弥散加权成像和 F-FDG-PET/CT 对以颈部转移为首发表现的不明原发头颈部癌的诊断价值。
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Oct;107:20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.08.009. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
7
Correlation between histogram-based DCE-MRI parameters and 18F-FDG PET values in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Evaluation in primary tumors and metastatic nodes.基于直方图的 DCE-MRI 参数与口咽鳞癌 18F-FDG PET 值的相关性:原发灶和转移淋巴结的评估。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 2;15(3):e0229611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229611. eCollection 2020.
8
Tumor metabolism and perfusion in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: pretreatment multimodality imaging with 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and [18F]FDG-PET.头颈部鳞状细胞癌的肿瘤代谢和灌注:1H 磁共振波谱、动态对比增强 MRI 和 [18F]FDG-PET 的预处理多模态成像。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.022. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
9
The Importance of the Time Interval Between Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging and Neck Dissection for the Detection of Nodal Metastases in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.术前 18F-FDG PET/CT 成像与颈部清扫术的时间间隔对头颈鳞状细胞癌患者淋巴结转移检测的重要性。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2024 Jul 1;27(7):859-864. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_38_24. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
10
18F-FLT PET does not discriminate between reactive and metastatic lymph nodes in primary head and neck cancer patients.18F-FLT正电子发射断层扫描(PET)无法区分原发性头颈癌患者的反应性淋巴结和转移性淋巴结。
J Nucl Med. 2007 May;48(5):726-35. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.037473.

引用本文的文献

1
PET/MR for predicting extranodal extension of head and neck cancer.正电子发射断层显像/磁共振成像用于预测头颈癌的结外侵犯
Neuroradiology. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s00234-025-03635-9.
2
T1 mapping for Head and Neck Cancer Patients undergoing Chemoradiotherapy: Feasibility of 3D Stack of Star Imaging.头部和颈部癌症患者放化疗的 T1 映射:3D 叠星星成像的可行性。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Oct;112:38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2024.04.005. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
3
MRI and PET/CT in the assessment of lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Human Brown Adipose Tissue Estimated With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Undergoes Changes in Composition After Cold Exposure: An MRI Study in Healthy Volunteers.通过磁共振成像评估的人体棕色脂肪组织在冷暴露后成分发生变化:一项针对健康志愿者的MRI研究
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Jan 9;10:898. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00898. eCollection 2019.
2
Cancer statistics, 2020.癌症统计数据,2020 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
3
Quantitative diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck tumors.
MRI 和 PET/CT 在头颈部癌症淋巴结转移评估中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 7;13(1):19347. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46845-y.
4
Comparable Accuracy of Quantitative and Visual Analyses of [F]FDG PET/CT for the Detection of Lymph Node Metastases from Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.[F]FDG PET/CT定量分析与视觉分析在检测头颈部鳞状细胞癌淋巴结转移方面的准确性比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 10;13(16):2638. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13162638.
5
The role of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients' preoperative staging.磁共振成像和计算机断层扫描在口腔鳞状细胞癌患者术前分期中的作用。
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 7;13:972042. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.972042. eCollection 2023.
6
Simultaneous multislice diffusion-weighted imaging versus standard diffusion-weighted imaging in whole-body PET/MRI.全身 PET/MRI 中同时多层扩散加权成像与标准扩散加权成像的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Apr;33(4):2536-2547. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09275-4. Epub 2022 Dec 3.
7
Diagnosing cervical lymph node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma based on third-generation dual-source, dual-energy computed tomography.基于第三代双源双能量 CT 诊断口腔鳞状细胞癌颈淋巴结转移。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Jan;33(1):162-171. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09033-6. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
8
Promise of hypoxia-targeted tracers in metastatic lymph node imaging.缺氧靶向示踪剂在转移性淋巴结成像中的前景
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Nov;49(13):4293-4297. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05938-y.
9
Synergistic motion compensation strategies for positron emission tomography when acquired simultaneously with magnetic resonance imaging.正电子发射断层成像与磁共振成像同时采集时的协同运动补偿策略。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2021 Aug 23;379(2204):20200207. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0207. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
头颈部肿瘤的定量扩散磁共振成像
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2018 Nov;8(10):1052-1065. doi: 10.21037/qims.2018.10.14.
4
Quantitative imaging biomarkers alliance (QIBA) recommendations for improved precision of DWI and DCE-MRI derived biomarkers in multicenter oncology trials.定量成像生物标志物联盟(QIBA)关于提高多中心肿瘤试验中 DWI 和 DCE-MRI 衍生生物标志物精度的建议。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Jun;49(7):e101-e121. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26518. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
5
Image Segmentation, Registration and Characterization in R with SimpleITK.使用SimpleITK在R语言中进行图像分割、配准与特征描述
J Stat Softw. 2018 Aug;86. doi: 10.18637/jss.v086.i08. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
6
Accuracy and precision of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters: How should one estimate contrast concentration?定量动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)参数的准确性和精确性:应如何估计对比剂浓度?
Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Oct;52:16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 16.
7
SimpleITK Image-Analysis Notebooks: a Collaborative Environment for Education and Reproducible Research.SimpleITK 图像分析笔记本:用于教育和可重复研究的协作环境。
J Digit Imaging. 2018 Jun;31(3):290-303. doi: 10.1007/s10278-017-0037-8.
8
Correlations Between DCE MRI and Histopathological Parameters in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.头颈部鳞状细胞癌中动态对比增强磁共振成像与组织病理学参数的相关性
Transl Oncol. 2017 Feb;10(1):17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
9
Relative sensitivities of DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic parameters to arterial input function (AIF) scaling.动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)药代动力学参数对动脉输入函数(AIF)缩放的相对敏感性。
J Magn Reson. 2016 Aug;269:104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2016.05.018. Epub 2016 May 28.
10
Potential Role of PET/MRI for Imaging Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Head and Neck Cancer.PET/MRI在头颈部癌转移淋巴结成像中的潜在作用
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Aug;207(2):248-56. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16265. Epub 2016 May 10.