Suppr超能文献

Desmin 和 CD31 免疫标记物用于检测胰胆管癌的静脉侵犯。

Desmin and CD31 immunolabeling for detecting venous invasion of the pancreatobiliary tract cancers.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Nov 30;15(11):e0242571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242571. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Although venous invasion (VI) is a poor prognostic factor for patients with pancreatobiliary tract cancers, its histopathologic characteristics have not been well described. We evaluated the patterns of VI and the added benefit provided by CD31, desmin, and dual CD31‒desmin immunolabeling for identification of VI. We included 120 surgically resected pancreatobiliary tract cancer cases-59 cases as a test set with known VI and 61 cases as a validation set without information of VI. VI was classified into three patterns: intraepithelial neoplasia-like (IN-like), conventional, and destructive. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and CD31, desmin, and dual CD31‒desmin immunolabeling were performed. Foci number and patterns of VI were compared with the test and validation sets. More foci of VI were detected by single CD31 (P = 0.022) than H&E staining in the test set. CD31 immunolabeling detected more foci of the conventional pattern of VI, and desmin immunolabeling detected more foci of the destructive pattern (all, P < 0.001). Dual CD31‒desmin immunolabeling identified more foci of VI (P = 0.012) and specifically detected more foci of IN-like (P = 0.045) and destructive patterns (P < 0.001) than H&E staining in the validation set. However, dual CD31‒desmin immunolabeling was not helpful for detecting the conventional pattern of VI in the validation set. Patients with VI detected by dual CD31‒desmin immunolabeling had shorter disease-free survival (P <0.001) than those without VI. VI detected by dual CD31‒desmin immunolabeling was a worse prognostic indicator (P = 0.009). More foci of VI could be detected with additional single CD31 or dual CD31‒desmin immunolabeling. The precise evaluation of VI with dual CD31‒desmin immunolabeling can provide additional prognostic information for patients with surgically resected pancreatobiliary tract cancers.

摘要

虽然静脉侵犯(VI)是胰胆管癌患者预后不良的一个因素,但它的组织病理学特征尚未得到很好的描述。我们评估了 VI 的模式以及 CD31、结蛋白和双重 CD31-结蛋白免疫标记物在识别 VI 方面的额外益处。我们纳入了 120 例手术切除的胰胆管癌病例-59 例作为有已知 VI 的测试集,61 例作为没有 VI 信息的验证集。VI 分为三种模式:上皮内肿瘤样(IN 样)、常规和破坏性。进行了苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色以及 CD31、结蛋白和双重 CD31-结蛋白免疫标记。比较了 VI 的焦点数量和模式与测试和验证集。在测试集中,与 H&E 染色相比,单一 CD31 检测到更多的 VI 焦点(P=0.022)。CD31 免疫标记检测到更多的常规 VI 模式焦点,而结蛋白免疫标记检测到更多的破坏性模式焦点(均 P<0.001)。双重 CD31-结蛋白免疫标记检测到更多的 VI 焦点(P=0.012),并且在验证集中,特别是在检测 IN 样和破坏性模式方面,比 H&E 染色检测到更多的 VI 焦点(P=0.045 和 P<0.001)。然而,在验证集中,双重 CD31-结蛋白免疫标记对于检测常规 VI 模式并没有帮助。在验证集中,通过双重 CD31-结蛋白免疫标记检测到 VI 的患者无病生存率更短(P<0.001)。通过双重 CD31-结蛋白免疫标记检测到的 VI 是更差的预后指标(P=0.009)。通过额外的单一 CD31 或双重 CD31-结蛋白免疫标记可以检测到更多的 VI 焦点。通过双重 CD31-结蛋白免疫标记对 VI 进行精确评估可以为手术切除的胰胆管癌患者提供额外的预后信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9261/7703967/1b8426aef18c/pone.0242571.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验