Black Mary H, Li Shuwei, LaDuca Holly, Lo Min-Tzu, Chen Jefferey, Hoiness Robert, Gutierrez Stephanie, Tippin-Davis Brigette, Lu Hsiao-Mei, Gielzak Marta, Wiley Kathleen, Shi Zhuqing, Wei Jun, Zheng Siqun Lilly, Helfand Brian T, Isaacs William, Xu Jianfeng
Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, California.
Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urologic Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Prostate. 2020 Nov;80(15):1314-1321. doi: 10.1002/pros.24058. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
Genome-wide association studies have identified over 100 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with prostate cancer (PrCa), and polygenic risk scores (PRS) based on their combined genotypes have been developed for risk stratification. We aimed to assess the contribution of PRS to PrCa risk in a large multisite study.
The sample included 1972 PrCa cases and 1919 unaffected controls. Next-generation sequencing was used to assess pathogenic variants in 14 PrCa-susceptibility genes and 72 validated PrCa-associated SNPs. We constructed a population-standardized PRS and tested its association with PrCa using logistic regression adjusted for age and family history of PrCa.
The mean age of PrCa cases at diagnosis and age of controls at testing/last clinic visit was 59.5 ± 7.2 and 57.2 ± 13.0 years, respectively. Among 1740 cases with pathology data, 57.4% had Gleason score ≤ 6, while 42.6% had Gleason score ≥ 8. In addition, 39.6% cases and 20.1% controls had a family history of PrCa. The PRS was significantly higher in cases than controls (mean ± SD: 1.42 ± 1.11 vs 1.02 ± 0.76; P < .0001). Compared with men in the 1st quartile of age-adjusted PRS, those in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartile were 1.58 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31-1.90), 2.36 (95% CI: 1.96-2.84), and 3.98 (95% CI: 3.29-4.82) times as likely to have PrCa (all P < .0001). Adjustment for family history yielded similar results. PRS predictive performance was consistent with prior literature (area under the receiver operating curve = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.62-0.66).
These data suggest that a 72-SNP PRS is predictive of PrCa, supporting its potential use in clinical risk assessment.
全基因组关联研究已鉴定出100多个与前列腺癌(PrCa)相关的单核苷酸多态性(SNP),并基于其组合基因型开发了多基因风险评分(PRS)用于风险分层。我们旨在通过一项大型多中心研究评估PRS对PrCa风险的贡献。
样本包括1972例PrCa病例和1919例未受影响的对照。采用新一代测序评估14个PrCa易感基因和72个已验证的PrCa相关SNP中的致病变异。我们构建了一个人群标准化的PRS,并使用针对年龄和PrCa家族史进行调整的逻辑回归检验其与PrCa的关联。
PrCa病例诊断时的平均年龄和对照检测/最后一次门诊就诊时的平均年龄分别为59.5±7.2岁和57.2±13.0岁。在1740例有病理数据的病例中,57.4%的病例Gleason评分≤6,而42.6%的病例Gleason评分≥8。此外,39.6%的病例和20.1%的对照有PrCa家族史。病例组的PRS显著高于对照组(平均值±标准差:1.42±1.11 vs 1.02±0.76;P<.0001)。与年龄调整后的PRS处于第一四分位数的男性相比,第二、第三和第四四分位数的男性患PrCa的可能性分别为1.58倍(95%置信区间[CI]:1.31-1.90)、2.36倍(95%CI:1.96-2.84)和3.98倍(95%CI:3.29-4.82)(所有P<.0001)。对家族史进行调整后得到了类似的结果。PRS的预测性能与先前的文献一致(受试者工作特征曲线下面积=0.64;95%CI:0.62-0.66)。
这些数据表明,72-SNP的PRS可预测PrCa,支持其在临床风险评估中的潜在应用。