• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性应激减少情绪性注意瞬脱:来自人类电生理学的证据。

Acute stress reduces the emotional attentional blink: Evidence from human electrophysiology.

作者信息

Kan Yuecui, Wang Xuewei, Chen Xitong, Zhao Hanxuan, Lan Jijun, Duan Haijun

机构信息

School of Psychology, Yanta Campus, Shaanxi Normal University, 199 South Chang'an Road, Xi'an, 710062, People's Republic of China.

Key Laboratory of Modern Teaching Technology, Ministry of Education, Shaanxi Normal University Centre for Teacher Professional Ability Development, Yanta Campus, 199 South Chang'an Road, Xi'an, 710062, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Feb;21(1):58-73. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00847-9. Epub 2020 Dec 2.

DOI:10.3758/s13415-020-00847-9
PMID:33263152
Abstract

The present study is the first to examine the time-dependent mechanism of acute stress on emotional attentional blink (EAB) with event-related potential (ERP) measures. We explored the stage characteristics of stress affecting EAB, whether it affects the early selective attention process (marked by early posterior negativity) or the late working memory consolidation (marked by late positive potential). Sixty-one healthy participants were exposed to either a Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) or a control condition, and salivary cortisol was measured to reflect the stress effect. ERPs were recorded during an attentional blink (AB) paradigm in which target one (T1) were negative or neutral images. Results showed stress generally reduced AB effects. Specifically, stress promoted the early selective attention process of target two (T2) following a neutral T1 but did not affect T2 consolidation into working memory. Correlational analyses further confirmed the positive effect of cortisol and negative emotional state on AB performance. Moreover, the ERP results of acute stress on AB conformed to the trade-off effect between T1 and T2; that is, stress reduced T1 late working memory consolidation and improved T2 early selective attention process. These findings further demonstrated that stress did not change the central resource limitation of AB. In general, stress generates a dissociable effect on AB early- and late-stage processing; namely, acute stress reduce the AB effect mainly from the improvement of participants' overall ability to select the targets in the early stage.

摘要

本研究首次采用事件相关电位(ERP)测量方法,探究急性应激对情绪性注意瞬脱(EAB)的时间依赖性机制。我们探讨了应激影响EAB的阶段特征,即它是否影响早期选择性注意过程(以早期后负波为标志)或晚期工作记忆巩固(以晚期正波为标志)。61名健康参与者被分为承受特里尔社会应激测试(TSST)组或对照组,并测量唾液皮质醇以反映应激效应。在注意瞬脱(AB)范式中记录ERP,其中目标一(T1)为负面或中性图像。结果显示,应激通常会降低AB效应。具体而言,应激促进了中性T1之后目标二(T2)的早期选择性注意过程,但不影响T2巩固到工作记忆中。相关性分析进一步证实了皮质醇和负面情绪状态对AB表现的积极影响。此外,急性应激对AB的ERP结果符合T1和T2之间的权衡效应;也就是说,应激减少了T1的晚期工作记忆巩固,并改善了T2的早期选择性注意过程。这些发现进一步证明,应激并未改变AB的中枢资源限制。总体而言,应激对AB的早期和晚期加工产生了可分离的影响;即急性应激主要通过提高参与者在早期选择目标的整体能力来降低AB效应。

相似文献

1
Acute stress reduces the emotional attentional blink: Evidence from human electrophysiology.急性应激减少情绪性注意瞬脱:来自人类电生理学的证据。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Feb;21(1):58-73. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00847-9. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
2
Do emotion-induced blindness and the attentional blink share underlying mechanisms? An event-related potential study of emotionally-arousing words.情绪诱发失明和注意瞬脱是否共享潜在机制?一项关于情绪唤起词的事件相关电位研究。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Jun;17(3):592-611. doi: 10.3758/s13415-017-0499-7.
3
Emotional modulation of the attentional blink: is there an effect of stress?情绪对注意瞬脱的调制:压力是否有影响?
Emotion. 2010 Apr;10(2):283-8. doi: 10.1037/a0017751.
4
Attentional blink affected by acute stress in women: The role of affective stimuli and attentional resources.女性急性应激对注意瞬脱的影响:情绪刺激和注意资源的作用。
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Oct;75:102796. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102796. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
5
More than a feeling: The emotional attentional blink relies on non-emotional "pop out," but is weak compared to the attentional blink.不仅仅是感觉:情绪性注意瞬脱依赖于非情绪性的“突出”,但与注意瞬脱相比较弱。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 May;85(4):1034-1053. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02677-6. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
6
Reaching back: the relative strength of the retroactive emotional attentional blink.追溯:回溯性情绪注意瞬脱的相对强度。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 3;7:43645. doi: 10.1038/srep43645.
7
The attentional blink reveals serial working memory encoding: evidence from virtual and human event-related potentials.注意瞬脱揭示了系列工作记忆编码:来自虚拟和人类事件相关电位的证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Mar;21(3):550-66. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21036.
8
Attentional modulation of early ERP components in response to faces: evidence from the attentional blink paradigm.注意调制对面孔早期 ERP 成分的影响:来自注意瞬脱范式的证据。
Brain Topogr. 2012 Apr;25(2):167-81. doi: 10.1007/s10548-011-0199-5. Epub 2011 Aug 21.
9
Word frequency and the attentional blink: the effects of target difficulty on retrieval and consolidation processes.词汇频率与注意瞬脱:目标难度对提取和巩固过程的影响。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 3;8(9):e73415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073415. eCollection 2013.
10
Emotional modulation of attention: fear increases but disgust reduces the attentional blink.情绪对注意的调节:恐惧增强但厌恶减少注意瞬脱。
PLoS One. 2009 Nov 19;4(11):e7924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007924.

引用本文的文献

1
Pupillometry and autonomic nervous system responses to cognitive load and false feedback: an unsupervised machine learning approach.瞳孔测量与自主神经系统对认知负荷和错误反馈的反应:一种无监督机器学习方法。
Front Neurosci. 2024 Aug 30;18:1445697. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1445697. eCollection 2024.
2
Emotional Valence in the Eye Region Modulates the Attentional Blink in a Task-Dependent Manner: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials.眼部区域的情绪效价以任务依赖的方式调节注意瞬脱:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Brain Sci. 2022 Dec 3;12(12):1665. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12121665.

本文引用的文献

1
Prioritized attentional processing: Acute stress, memory and stimulus emotionality facilitate attentional disengagement.优先注意加工:急性应激、记忆和刺激情绪促进注意力的脱离。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 17;138:107334. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107334. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
2
Attentional blink affected by acute stress in women: The role of affective stimuli and attentional resources.女性急性应激对注意瞬脱的影响:情绪刺激和注意资源的作用。
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Oct;75:102796. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102796. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
3
The effect of mild acute psychological stress on attention processing: an ERP study.
轻度急性心理应激对注意力加工的影响:一项事件相关电位研究
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Jul;236(7):2061-2071. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5283-6. Epub 2018 May 10.
4
Acute stress affects prospective memory functions via associative memory processes.急性应激通过联想记忆过程影响前瞻性记忆功能。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Jan;182:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
5
Effects of Stress and Task Difficulty on Working Memory and Cortical Networking.压力和任务难度对工作记忆及皮层网络的影响。
Percept Mot Skills. 2017 Dec;124(6):1194-1210. doi: 10.1177/0031512517732851. Epub 2017 Sep 24.
6
Influence of acute stress on response inhibition in healthy men: An ERP study.急性应激对健康男性反应抑制的影响:一项事件相关电位研究。
Psychophysiology. 2017 May;54(5):684-695. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12826. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
7
Effect of acute psychological stress on response inhibition: An event-related potential study.急性心理应激对反应抑制的影响:一项事件相关电位研究。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Apr 14;323:32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.01.036. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
8
Attention bias towards negative emotional information and its relationship with daily worry in the context of acute stress: An eye-tracking study.急性应激背景下对负面情绪信息的注意偏向及其与日常担忧的关系:一项眼动追踪研究。
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Mar;90:96-110. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.12.013. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
9
Masculine Discrepancy Stress, Emotion-Regulation Difficulties, and Intimate Partner Violence.男性差异压力、情绪调节困难与亲密伴侣暴力
J Interpers Violence. 2016 May 24;34(6):1163-1182. doi: 10.1177/0886260516650967. Print 2019 Mar 1.
10
Acute Stress Dysregulates the LPP ERP Response to Emotional Pictures and Impairs Sustained Attention: Time-Sensitive Effects.急性应激会使对情绪图片的LPP事件相关电位反应失调,并损害持续注意力:时间敏感性效应。
Brain Sci. 2015 May 20;5(2):201-19. doi: 10.3390/brainsci5020201.