CAPITAL Research Group, Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jan;14(1):354-361. doi: 10.1111/cts.12886. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
Adenosine boasts promising preclinical and clinical data supporting a vital role in modulating vascular homeostasis. Its widespread use as a diagnostic and therapeutic agent have been limited by its short half-life and complex biology, though adenosine-modulators have shown promise in improving vascular healing. Moreover, circulating adenosine has shown promise in predicting cardiovascular (CV) events. We sought to delineate whether circulating plasma adenosine levels predict CV events in patients undergoing invasive assessment for coronary artery disease. Patients undergoing invasive angiography had clinical data prospectively recorded in the Cardiovascular and Percutaneous ClInical TriALs (CAPITAL) revascularization registry and blood samples collected in the CAPITAL Biobank from which adenosine levels were quantified. Tertile-based analysis was used to assess prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, and cerebrovascular accident). Secondary analyses included MACE subgroups, clinical subgroups and adenosine levels. There were 1,815 patients undergoing angiography who had blood collected with adenosine quantified in 1,323. Of those quantified, 51.0% were revascularized and 7.3% experienced MACE in 12 months of follow-up. Tertile-based analysis failed to demonstrate any stratification of MACE rates (log rank, P = 0.83), when comparing low-to-middle (hazard ratio (HR) 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-1.78, P = 0.70) or low-to-high adenosine tertiles (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.56-1.57, P = 0.84). In adjusted analysis, adenosine similarly failed to predict MACE. Finally, adenosine did not predict outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome nor in those revascularized or treated medically. Plasma adenosine levels do not predict subsequent CV outcomes or aid in patient risk stratification.
腺苷具有有前景的临床前和临床数据,支持其在调节血管稳态方面的重要作用。尽管腺苷调节剂在改善血管愈合方面显示出了希望,但由于其半衰期短和生物学复杂性,其作为诊断和治疗药物的广泛应用受到了限制。此外,循环中的腺苷已显示出预测心血管 (CV) 事件的潜力。我们试图确定接受冠状动脉疾病侵袭性评估的患者中循环血浆腺苷水平是否可预测 CV 事件。接受血管造影检查的患者前瞻性地记录在心血管和经皮临床试验 (CAPITAL) 再血管化登记处的临床数据,并在 CAPITAL 生物库中采集血液样本,以定量测定腺苷水平。基于三分位的分析用于评估主要不良心血管事件 (MACE;死亡、心肌梗死、计划外血运重建和脑血管意外的综合) 的预测。次要分析包括 MACE 亚组、临床亚组和腺苷水平。有 1815 名接受血管造影检查的患者采集了血液,其中 1323 名患者的血液中定量测定了腺苷。在这些定量的患者中,51.0%进行了血运重建,7.3%在 12 个月的随访中发生 MACE。基于三分位的分析未能显示 MACE 发生率的任何分层(对数秩检验,P=0.83),当比较低-中(危险比 (HR) 1.10,95%置信区间 (CI) 0.68-1.78,P=0.70)或低-高腺苷三分位时(HR 0.95,95% CI 0.56-1.57,P=0.84)。在调整后的分析中,腺苷也未能预测 MACE。最后,腺苷不能预测急性冠状动脉综合征患者或血运重建或药物治疗患者的结局。血浆腺苷水平不能预测随后的 CV 结局,也不能帮助患者进行风险分层。