Moon Kyumin
Department of Philosophy, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea.
Entropy (Basel). 2019 Apr 16;21(4):405. doi: 10.3390/e21040405.
Integrated information theory (IIT) asserts that both the level and the quality of consciousness can be explained by the ability of physical systems to integrate information. Although the scientific content and empirical prospects of IIT have attracted interest, this paper focuses on another aspect of IIT, its unique theoretical structure, which relates the phenomenological axioms with the ontological postulates. In particular, the relationship between the exclusion axiom and the exclusion postulate is unclear. Moreover, the exclusion postulate leads to a serious problem in IIT: the quale underdetermination problem. Therefore, in this paper, I will explore answers to the following three questions: (1) how does the exclusion axiom lead to the exclusion postulate? (2) How does the exclusion postulate cause the qualia underdetermination problem? (3) Is there a solution to this problem? I will provide proposals and arguments for each question. If successful, IIT can be confirmed with respect to, not only its theoretical foundation, but also its practical application.
整合信息理论(IIT)断言,意识的水平和质量都可以通过物理系统整合信息的能力来解释。尽管IIT的科学内容和实证前景已引起关注,但本文关注的是IIT的另一个方面,即其独特的理论结构,该结构将现象学公理与本体论假设联系起来。特别是,排除公理与排除假设之间的关系尚不清楚。此外,排除假设在IIT中导致了一个严重问题:感受质不确定性问题。因此,在本文中,我将探讨以下三个问题的答案:(1)排除公理如何导致排除假设?(2)排除假设如何导致感受质不确定性问题?(3)这个问题有解决方案吗?我将针对每个问题提出建议并进行论证。如果成功,IIT不仅在其理论基础方面,而且在其实践应用方面都能得到确证。