• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么通路方法的效果比预期要好?

Why do pathway methods work better than they should?

机构信息

Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Institute of Computational Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Germany.

出版信息

FEBS Lett. 2020 Dec;594(24):4189-4200. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.14011. Epub 2020 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1002/1873-3468.14011
PMID:33270910
Abstract

Pathway analysis methods are frequently applied to cancer gene expression data to identify dysregulated pathways. These methods often infer pathway activity based on the expression of genes belonging to a given pathway, even though the proteins ultimately determine the activity of a given pathway. Furthermore, the association between gene expression levels and protein activities is not well-characterized. Here, we posit that pathway-based methods are effective not because of the correlation between expression and activity of members of a given pathway, but because pathway gene sets overlap with the genes regulated by transcription factors (TFs). Thus, pathway-based methods do not inform about the activity of the pathway of interest but rather reflect changes in TF activities.

摘要

通路分析方法常被应用于癌症基因表达数据,以识别失调的通路。这些方法通常基于给定通路中基因的表达来推断通路活性,尽管最终决定特定通路活性的是蛋白质。此外,基因表达水平与蛋白活性之间的关联尚未得到很好的描述。在这里,我们认为基于通路的方法之所以有效,不是因为给定通路成员的表达与活性之间存在相关性,而是因为通路基因集与转录因子(TFs)调控的基因重叠。因此,基于通路的方法并不能提供有关感兴趣通路活性的信息,而是反映了 TF 活性的变化。

相似文献

1
Why do pathway methods work better than they should?为什么通路方法的效果比预期要好?
FEBS Lett. 2020 Dec;594(24):4189-4200. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.14011. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
2
Beyond Trees: Regulons and Regulatory Motif Characterization.超越树状结构:调控子和调控基序特征描述。
Genes (Basel). 2020 Aug 25;11(9):995. doi: 10.3390/genes11090995.
3
Limits to a classic paradigm: most transcription factors in E. coli regulate genes involved in multiple biological processes.经典范式的局限性:大肠杆菌中的大多数转录因子调节涉及多个生物过程的基因。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jul 26;47(13):6656-6667. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz525.
4
iRegulon and i-cisTarget: Reconstructing Regulatory Networks Using Motif and Track Enrichment.iRegulon和i-cisTarget:利用基序和轨迹富集重建调控网络。
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2015 Dec 17;52:2.16.1-2.16.39. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0216s52.
5
Gene set enrichment analysis of pathways and transcription factors associated with diabetic retinopathy using a microarray dataset.使用微阵列数据集对与糖尿病视网膜病变相关的通路和转录因子进行基因集富集分析。
Int J Mol Med. 2015 Jul;36(1):103-12. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2015.2220. Epub 2015 May 22.
6
Temporal transcriptional logic of dynamic regulatory networks underlying nitrogen signaling and use in plants.氮信号及其在植物中的利用的动态调控网络的时间转录逻辑。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 19;115(25):6494-6499. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721487115. Epub 2018 May 16.
7
Extracting regulatory networks of Escherichia coli from RegulonDB.从调控基因数据库(RegulonDB)中提取大肠杆菌的调控网络。
Methods Mol Biol. 2012;804:179-95. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-361-5_10.
8
Network Motifs Capable of Decoding Transcription Factor Dynamics.能够解码转录因子动力学的网络基元。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 26;8(1):3594. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21945-2.
9
Modeling microRNA-transcription factor networks in cancer.癌症中的 microRNA-转录因子网络建模。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;774:149-67. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-5590-1_9.
10
A novel meta-analysis approach of cancer transcriptomes reveals prevailing transcriptional networks in cancer cells.一种针对癌症转录组的新型荟萃分析方法揭示了癌细胞中普遍存在的转录网络。
Genome Inform. 2010 Jan;22:121-31.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of perturbation gene expression profiles in drug discovery-From mechanism of action to quantitative modelling.扰动基因表达谱在药物发现中的应用——从作用机制到定量建模
Front Syst Biol. 2023 Feb 9;3:1126044. doi: 10.3389/fsysb.2023.1126044. eCollection 2023.
2
RIDDEN: Data-driven inference of receptor activity from transcriptomic data.RIDDEN:基于转录组数据的受体活性数据驱动推理
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Jun 16;21(6):e1013188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013188. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Transcriptomic Evidence Reveals the Dysfunctional Mechanism of Synaptic Plasticity Control in ASD.
转录组学证据揭示了自闭症谱系障碍中突触可塑性控制的功能失调机制。
Genes (Basel). 2024 Dec 25;16(1):11. doi: 10.3390/genes16010011.
4
Comparative evaluation of feature reduction methods for drug response prediction.用于药物反应预测的特征约简方法的比较评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):30885. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81866-1.
5
SiRCle (Signature Regulatory Clustering) model integration reveals mechanisms of phenotype regulation in renal cancer.SiRCle(特征性调控聚类)模型整合揭示了肾癌中表型调控的机制。
Genome Med. 2024 Dec 4;16(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13073-024-01415-3.
6
Differential activity of MAPK signalling defines fibroblast subtypes in pancreatic cancer.MAPK信号通路的差异活性定义了胰腺癌中的成纤维细胞亚型。
Nat Commun. 2024 Dec 3;15(1):10534. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54975-8.
7
From CFTR to a CF signalling network: a systems biology approach to study Cystic Fibrosis.从 CFTR 到 CF 信号网络:一种系统生物学方法研究囊性纤维化。
BMC Genomics. 2024 Sep 28;25(1):892. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10752-x.
8
Gene regulatory networks in disease and ageing.疾病和衰老中的基因调控网络。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2024 Sep;20(9):616-633. doi: 10.1038/s41581-024-00849-7. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
9
Network integration of thermal proteome profiling with multi-omics data decodes PARP inhibition.热蛋白质组 profiling 与多组学数据的网络整合解码 PARP 抑制。
Mol Syst Biol. 2024 Apr;20(4):458-474. doi: 10.1038/s44320-024-00025-w. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
10
Benchmarking causal reasoning algorithms for gene expression-based compound mechanism of action analysis.基于基因表达的化合物作用机制分析的因果推理算法的基准测试。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2023 Apr 18;24(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05277-1.