• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

景观简化改变了亚热带地区筑巢诱捕蜜蜂和黄蜂群落。

Landscape Simplification Modifies Trap-Nesting Bee and Wasp Communities in the Subtropics.

作者信息

Wilson Rachele S, Leonhardt Sara D, Burwell Chris J, Fuller Chris, Smith Tobias J, Kaluza Benjamin F, Wallace Helen M

机构信息

Genecology Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Dr, Sippy Downs, Queensland 4556, Australia.

Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Rd, Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia.

出版信息

Insects. 2020 Dec 1;11(12):853. doi: 10.3390/insects11120853.

DOI:10.3390/insects11120853
PMID:33271986
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7760584/
Abstract

(1) Background: Landscape simplification is a major threat to bee and wasp conservation in the tropics, but reliable, long-term population data are lacking. We investigated how community composition, diversity, and abundance of tropical solitary bees and wasps change with landscape simplification (plant diversity, plant richness, distance from forest, forest cover, and land use type) and season. (2) Methods: We installed 336 timber and cob trap nests in four complex forests and three simplified orchards within the subtropical biodiversity hotspot of south-east Queensland, Australia. Trap nests were replaced every season for 23 months and all emergents identified. (3) Results: We identified 28 wasp species and 13 bee species from 2251 brood cells. Bee and wasp community composition changed with landscape simplification such that large, ground-nesting, and spider-hunting species were present in all landscapes, while those with specialist resource requirements and (clepto) parasitoids were present only in complex landscapes. Abundance and diversity of bees and wasps were unaffected by landscape simplification but increased with rainfall. (4) Conclusions: This study highlights the need for multi-year studies incorporating nuanced measures such as composition with a focus on functional diversity to detect changes bee and wasp populations.

摘要

(1)背景:景观简化是热带地区蜜蜂和黄蜂保护面临的主要威胁,但缺乏可靠的长期种群数据。我们研究了热带独居蜜蜂和黄蜂的群落组成、多样性和丰度如何随景观简化(植物多样性、植物丰富度、与森林的距离、森林覆盖率和土地利用类型)和季节而变化。(2)方法:我们在澳大利亚昆士兰州东南部亚热带生物多样性热点地区的四片复杂森林和三个简化果园中安装了336个木材和土坯诱捕巢。诱捕巢每季节更换一次,为期23个月,并识别所有羽化的个体。(3)结果:我们从2251个育雏室中识别出28种黄蜂和13种蜜蜂。蜜蜂和黄蜂的群落组成随景观简化而变化,因此所有景观中都有大型、地栖和捕食蜘蛛的物种,而那些有特殊资源需求的物种和(盗窃性)寄生蜂仅存在于复杂景观中。蜜蜂和黄蜂的丰度和多样性不受景观简化的影响,但随降雨量增加。(4)结论:本研究强调需要进行多年研究,纳入细致入微的测量方法,如以功能多样性为重点的组成,以检测蜜蜂和黄蜂种群的变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59fb/7760584/d6cda39688da/insects-11-00853-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59fb/7760584/ab38a21bc328/insects-11-00853-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59fb/7760584/d6cda39688da/insects-11-00853-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59fb/7760584/ab38a21bc328/insects-11-00853-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59fb/7760584/d6cda39688da/insects-11-00853-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Landscape Simplification Modifies Trap-Nesting Bee and Wasp Communities in the Subtropics.景观简化改变了亚热带地区筑巢诱捕蜜蜂和黄蜂群落。
Insects. 2020 Dec 1;11(12):853. doi: 10.3390/insects11120853.
2
Multi-trophic communities re-establish with canopy cover and microclimate in a subtropical forest biodiversity experiment.在亚热带森林生物多样性实验中,随着林冠覆盖和小气候的恢复,多营养级群落得以重建。
Oecologia. 2021 May;196(1):289-301. doi: 10.1007/s00442-021-04921-y. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
3
Multi-scalar drivers of biodiversity: local management mediates wild bee community response to regional urbanization.生物多样性的多尺度驱动因素:当地管理调节野生蜜蜂群落对区域城市化的响应。
Ecol Appl. 2019 Apr;29(3):e01869. doi: 10.1002/eap.1869. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
4
Local and landscape effects in a host-parasitoid interaction network along a forest-cropland gradient.沿森林-农田梯度的寄主-寄生蜂相互作用网络中的局部和景观效应
Ecol Appl. 2015 Oct;25(7):1869-79. doi: 10.1890/14-2476.1.
5
Vertical Stratification of Solitary Bees and Wasps in an Urban Forest from the Brazilian Amazon.巴西亚马逊城市森林中单居性蜜蜂和胡蜂的垂直分层。
Neotrop Entomol. 2024 Jun;53(3):552-567. doi: 10.1007/s13744-024-01142-9. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
6
Floral and nesting resources, habitat structure, and fire influence bee distribution across an open-forest gradient.花和巢资源、生境结构以及火对开阔林梯度上的蜜蜂分布的影响。
Ecol Appl. 2010 Sep;20(6):1678-92. doi: 10.1890/08-1792.1.
7
Trap-Nesting Hymenoptera and Their Network with Parasites in Recovered Riparian Forests Brazil.巴西恢复的河岸森林中筑巢陷阱膜翅目昆虫及其与寄生虫的网络关系
Neotrop Entomol. 2018 Feb;47(1):26-36. doi: 10.1007/s13744-017-0504-4. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
8
Foraging traits modulate stingless bee community disassembly under forest loss.觅食习性调节森林丧失下无刺蜂群落解体。
J Anim Ecol. 2017 Oct;86(6):1404-1416. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12747. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
9
Metabarcoding of trap nests reveals differential impact of urbanization on cavity-nesting bee and wasp communities.陷阱巢的代谢条形码揭示了城市化对洞穴筑巢蜜蜂和黄蜂群落的不同影响。
Mol Ecol. 2023 Dec;32(23):6449-6460. doi: 10.1111/mec.16818. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
10
No Vertical Stratification Found in Cavity-Nesting bees and Wasps in Two Neotropical Forests of Argentina.在阿根廷两片新热带森林的洞穴筑巢蜜蜂和黄蜂中未发现垂直分层现象。
Neotrop Entomol. 2019 Oct;48(5):779-787. doi: 10.1007/s13744-019-00696-3. Epub 2019 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Bee Hotels as a Tool for Post-Fire Recovery of Cavity-Nesting Native Bees.蜂箱作为火灾后筑巢于洞穴的本土蜜蜂恢复的工具。
Insects. 2025 Jun 25;16(7):659. doi: 10.3390/insects16070659.
2
Nesting Behavior, Phenology, and Bionomics of the High Andean Leaf-Cutter Bee Megachile (Cressoniella) amparo.高海拔安第斯叶切蜂 Megachile (Cressoniella) amparo 的筑巢行为、物候学和生物学
Neotrop Entomol. 2023 Oct;52(5):814-825. doi: 10.1007/s13744-023-01061-1. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
3
Diets maintained in a changing world: Does land-use intensification alter wild bee communities by selecting for flexible generalists?

本文引用的文献

1
Bee pollinator functional responses and functional effects in restored tropical forests.恢复热带森林中的蜜蜂传粉者功能反应和功能效应。
Ecol Appl. 2020 Apr;30(3):e02054. doi: 10.1002/eap.2054. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
2
Arthropod decline in grasslands and forests is associated with landscape-level drivers.草原和森林中的节肢动物减少与景观水平的驱动因素有关。
Nature. 2019 Oct;574(7780):671-674. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1684-3. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
3
Seasonal dynamics in a cavity-nesting bee-wasp community: Shifts in composition, functional diversity and host-parasitoid network structure.
变化世界中的饮食:土地利用集约化是否通过选择灵活的泛化种来改变野生蜜蜂群落?
Ecol Evol. 2022 May 15;12(5):e8919. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8919. eCollection 2022 May.
腔巢蜂-黄蜂群落的季节性动态:组成、功能多样性和寄主-寄生蜂网络结构的变化。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 16;13(10):e0205854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205854. eCollection 2018.
4
The effect of habitat fragmentation on the bee visitor assemblages of three Australian tropical rainforest tree species.栖息地破碎化对三种澳大利亚热带雨林树种的访花蜜蜂群落的影响。
Ecol Evol. 2018 Jul 22;8(16):8204-8216. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4339. eCollection 2018 Aug.
5
Interactions between bee foraging and floral resource phenology shape bee populations and communities.蜂类觅食与花卉资源物候的相互作用塑造了蜂类种群和群落。
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2017 Jun;21:75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
6
The importance of pollen chemistry in evolutionary host shifts of bees.花粉化学在蜜蜂进化性寄主转移中的重要性。
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 20;7:43058. doi: 10.1038/srep43058.
7
Urban gardens promote bee foraging over natural habitats and plantations.城市花园比自然栖息地和种植园更有利于蜜蜂觅食。
Ecol Evol. 2016 Jan 28;6(5):1304-16. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1941. eCollection 2016 Mar.
8
Experimental evidence that wildflower strips increase pollinator visits to crops.有实验证据表明,野花带能增加传粉者对农作物的访花次数。
Ecol Evol. 2015 Aug;5(16):3523-30. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1444. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
9
'Bee hotels' as tools for native pollinator conservation: a premature verdict?作为本土传粉者保护工具的“蜜蜂旅馆”:定论过早?
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 18;10(3):e0122126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122126. eCollection 2015.
10
Using observation-level random effects to model overdispersion in count data in ecology and evolution.使用观察水平的随机效应模型来模拟生态学和进化中的计数数据的过离散。
PeerJ. 2014 Oct 9;2:e616. doi: 10.7717/peerj.616. eCollection 2014.