Grupo de Investigación en Salud Comfamiliar, Clínica Comfamiliar, Pereira, Colombia.
Grupo de Investigación en Salud Comfamiliar, Clínica Comfamiliar, Pereira, Colombia; Programa de Medicina, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira, Colombia.
Biomedica. 2020 Dec 2;40(4):664-672. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.5123.
Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major global health problem causing high morbidity and mortality. Easy to apply, cost-effective, and available COPD severity measures are required in rural areas. Objective: To assess the validity and reliability of the COPD Severity Score (COPDSS) in Colombian patients attended in primary care. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a sample of 100 patients diagnosed with COPD according to GOLD guidelines. Convergent validity was assessed by correlating the COPDSS results with other important variables such as those assessed through the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ) and the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). Results: The COPDSS showed a significant correlation with the FEV1 (r=-0.33), with the CRQ (r=-0.57) and its dimensions: Dyspnea (r=0.51), fatigue (r=0.53), emotional function (r=0.43), and disease control (r=0.50). The factor analysis identified a single factor with a cumulative variance of 59.1%. The internal consistency analysis showed an adequate Cronbach’s alpha of 0.76. Conclusions: The use of the COPDSS as an assessment test for COPD patients in Colombia showed adequate validity, reliability, and easy application in primary care.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是一个主要的全球健康问题,导致高发病率和死亡率。在农村地区需要易于应用、具有成本效益且可用的 COPD 严重程度衡量标准。目的:评估 COPD 严重程度评分(COPDSS)在哥伦比亚初级保健中就诊的 COPD 患者中的有效性和可靠性。材料和方法:进行了一项横断面研究,纳入了根据 GOLD 指南诊断为 COPD 的 100 例患者。通过将 COPDSS 结果与其他重要变量(如通过慢性呼吸道疾病问卷(CRQ)和一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)评估的变量)进行相关性评估,来评估其收敛效度。结果:COPDSS 与 FEV1(r=-0.33)、CRQ(r=-0.57)及其各维度(呼吸困难[r=0.51]、疲劳[r=0.53]、情感功能[r=0.43]和疾病控制[r=0.50])均呈显著相关。因子分析确定了一个具有 59.1%累积方差的单一因子。内部一致性分析显示 Cronbach’s alpha 为 0.76,表明具有良好的信度。结论:在哥伦比亚,将 COPDSS 用作 COPD 患者的评估测试,其有效性、可靠性和在初级保健中的易用性均得到了证实。