Jonklaas Jacqueline, Bianco Antonio C, Cappola Anne R, Celi Francesco S, Fliers Eric, Heuer Heike, McAninch Elizabeth A, Moeller Lars C, Nygaard Birte, Sawka Anna M, Watt Torquil, Dayan Colin M
Division of Endocrinology, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Section of Adult and Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Eur Thyroid J. 2021 Mar;10(1):10-38. doi: 10.1159/000512970. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
Fourteen clinical trials have not shown a consistent benefit of combination therapy with levothyroxine (LT4) and liothyronine (LT3). Despite the publication of these trials, combination therapy is widely used and patients reporting benefit continue to generate patient and physician interest in this area. Recent scientific developments may provide insight into this inconsistency and guide future studies.
The American Thyroid Association (ATA), British Thyroid Association (BTA), and European Thyroid Association (ETA) held a joint conference on November 3, 2019 (live-streamed between Chicago and London) to review new basic science and clinical evidence regarding combination therapy with presentations and input from 12 content experts. After the presentations, the material was synthesized and used to develop Summary Statements of the current state of knowledge. After review and revision of the material and Summary Statements, there was agreement that there was equipoise for a new clinical trial of combination therapy. Consensus Statements encapsulating the implications of the material discussed with respect to the design of future clinical trials of LT4/LT3 combination therapy were generated. Authors voted upon the Consensus Statements. Iterative changes were made in several rounds of voting and after comments from ATA/BTA/ETA members.
Of 34 Consensus Statements available for voting, 28 received at least 75% agreement, with 13 receiving 100% agreement. Those with 100% agreement included studies being powered to study the effect of deiodinase and thyroid hormone transporter polymorphisms on study outcomes, inclusion of patients dissatisfied with their current therapy and requiring at least 1.2 µg/kg of LT4 daily, use of twice daily LT3 or preferably a slow-release preparation if available, use of patient-reported outcomes as a primary outcome (measured by a tool with both relevant content validity and responsiveness) and patient preference as a secondary outcome, and utilization of a randomized placebo-controlled adequately powered double-blinded parallel design. The remaining statements are presented as potential additional considerations.
This article summarizes the areas discussed and presents Consensus Statements to guide development of future clinical trials of LT4/LT3 combination therapy. The results of such redesigned trials are expected to be of benefit to patients and of value to inform future thyroid hormone replacement clinical practice guidelines treatment recommendations.
14项临床试验尚未显示左甲状腺素(LT4)与碘塞罗宁(LT3)联合治疗具有一致的益处。尽管发表了这些试验,但联合治疗仍被广泛使用,报告有获益的患者继续引起患者和医生对该领域的兴趣。近期的科学进展可能有助于解释这种不一致性,并为未来的研究提供指导。
美国甲状腺协会(ATA)、英国甲状腺协会(BTA)和欧洲甲状腺协会(ETA)于2019年11月3日召开了一次联合会议(在芝加哥和伦敦之间进行了直播),以通过12位内容专家的报告和意见来审查关于联合治疗的新基础科学和临床证据。报告之后,对材料进行了综合整理,并用于制定当前知识状态的总结声明。在对材料和总结声明进行审查和修订之后,一致认为对于联合治疗的新临床试验存在 equipoise。生成了共识声明,概括了所讨论材料对LT4/LT3联合治疗未来临床试验设计的影响。作者对共识声明进行了投票。在几轮投票以及收到ATA/BTA/ETA成员的评论之后进行了反复修改。
在可供投票的34项共识声明中,28项获得了至少75%的同意,其中13项获得了100%的同意。获得100%同意的声明包括:开展有足够效力的研究以探讨脱碘酶和甲状腺激素转运体基因多态性对研究结果的影响;纳入对当前治疗不满意且每日至少需要1.2µg/kg LT4的患者;每日两次使用LT3,若有缓释制剂则优先使用;将患者报告的结果作为主要结局(通过具有相关内容效度和反应性的工具进行测量),将患者偏好作为次要结局;采用随机、安慰剂对照、有足够效力的双盲平行设计。其余声明作为潜在的额外考虑因素列出。
本文总结了所讨论的领域,并提出了共识声明,以指导LT4/LT3联合治疗未来临床试验的开展。预计此类重新设计试验的结果将使患者受益,并为未来甲状腺激素替代临床实践指南的治疗建议提供参考价值。