• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者报告的微创性骶髂关节融合术的临床结果。

Patient Reported Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis.

机构信息

Orthopaedic Surgery Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Highmark Health Data Science R&D, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Orthop Surg. 2021 Feb;13(1):71-76. doi: 10.1111/os.12832. Epub 2020 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1111/os.12832
PMID:33283956
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7862154/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To report patient-reported outcomes of minimally invasive sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion as a case series.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective cohort study of patients 18 years of age and older who underwent a minimally invasive SI joint fusion by a single surgeon between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2015. Routine demographic data, characteristics, and relevant surgical and clinical data were all collected for this group. In addition, patients completed preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) and Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires to assess outcomes. Patient selection for SI fusion was based on short-term resolution of symptoms (80% or greater relief) with an image-guided intra-articular injection of local anesthetic. Routine statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, Fisher's exact test, or χ analysis as appropriate.

RESULTS

This study included 19 patients comprising 24 SI fusions, with a mean follow-up of 58 months. The average patient age was 50 years and the average surgical blood loss was 25 cc. Men comprised 79% of the cohort. The VAS score improved from 7 to 3 (P = 0.0001). SF-36 physical function, role limitations due to physical health, and role limitations due to emotional health improved to a statistically significant extent. General health was not significantly changed. Every patient showed improvement in their SF-36 physical function scores (mean 40 preoperatively to 55 at final follow up) and 18 of 19 showed improvement in the VAS score (mean 7 preoperatively to 3 at final follow-up).

CONCLUSION

In appropriately selected patients, minimally invasive SI joint fusion results in decreased pain and improved physical functioning of patients, which is sustained for more than 4 years post-procedure.

摘要

目的

报告经皮微创骶髂(SI)关节融合术的患者报告结局,采用病例系列研究方法。

方法

本研究为单外科医生于 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间对 18 岁及以上患者进行微创 SI 关节融合术的回顾性队列研究。收集了该组患者的常规人口统计学数据、特征以及相关的手术和临床数据。此外,患者在术前和术后均完成视觉模拟量表(VAS)和健康调查简表 36(SF-36)问卷,以评估结局。SI 融合患者的选择基于短期症状缓解(80%或更高缓解率),同时对关节内进行影像引导下局部麻醉注射。采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验、Fisher 确切检验或 χ 分析等适当的常规统计分析。

结果

本研究纳入了 19 例患者(共 24 个 SI 融合),平均随访 58 个月。患者的平均年龄为 50 岁,平均手术失血量为 25cc。男性占队列的 79%。VAS 评分从 7 分降至 3 分(P=0.0001)。SF-36 躯体功能、因躯体健康问题所致的角色受限和因情绪健康问题所致的角色受限均有显著改善。一般健康状况无明显变化。所有患者的 SF-36 躯体功能评分均有改善(术前平均 40 分,末次随访时为 55 分),19 例中有 18 例患者的 VAS 评分有改善(术前平均 7 分,末次随访时为 3 分)。

结论

在适当选择的患者中,经皮微创 SI 关节融合术可减轻疼痛,改善患者躯体功能,且术后 4 年以上仍可维持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5dc/7862154/bdb1acccde24/OS-13-71-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5dc/7862154/bdb1acccde24/OS-13-71-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5dc/7862154/bdb1acccde24/OS-13-71-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient Reported Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis.患者报告的微创性骶髂关节融合术的临床结果。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Feb;13(1):71-76. doi: 10.1111/os.12832. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
2
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium versus Cylindrical Threaded Implants: A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes.采用三角形钛与圆柱形螺纹植入物微创性骶髂关节融合术:患者报告结局比较。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jan;133:e745-e750. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.150. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
3
Clinical outcome following anterior arthrodesis in patients with presumed sacroiliac joint pain.疑似骶髂关节疼痛患者前路关节融合术后的临床结果
Scand J Pain. 2017 Oct;17:22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
4
Minimally invasive sacroiliac arthrodesis: outcomes of a new technique.微创骶髂关节融合术:一种新技术的疗效
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Dec;21(8):579-84. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31815ecc4b.
5
Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review.微创骶髂关节融合术治疗慢性骶髂关节痛:系统评价。
Spine J. 2022 Aug;22(8):1240-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
6
Fusion and patient-reported outcomes after navigated decortication and direct arthrodesis in minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using cylindrical threaded implants: a case series and literature review.导航下减压和直接关节融合治疗微创骶髂关节融合中使用圆柱螺纹植入物后的融合和患者报告结局:病例系列和文献复习。
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Jul;55(1):E2. doi: 10.3171/2023.4.FOCUS23145.
7
Functional and radiographic outcome of sacroiliac arthrodesis for the disorders of the sacroiliac joint.骶髂关节疾病行骶髂关节融合术的功能及影像学结果
Spine J. 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):520-8; discussion 529. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.02.022.
8
Patient-reported outcomes after minimally invasive sacro-iliac joint surgery: a cohort study based on the Swedish Spine Registry.基于瑞典脊柱登记处的微创骶髂关节手术后患者报告的结局:一项队列研究。
Acta Orthop. 2024 Jun 14;95:284-289. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.40817.
9
Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study.微创骶髂关节融合术的安全性及6个月疗效:一项前瞻性研究。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2013 Dec 13;6:219-29. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S55197. eCollection 2013.
10
Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint.骶髂关节稳定术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Jul;35(2 Suppl):Editorial. doi: 10.3171/2013.V2.FOCUS13273.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive lateral, posterior, and posterolateral sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创外侧、后侧及后外侧骶髂关节融合术治疗腰痛:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Int Med Res. 2025 Feb;53(2):3000605251315300. doi: 10.1177/03000605251315300.
2
American Society of Pain and Neuroscience Best Practice (ASPN) Guideline for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Disorders.美国疼痛与神经科学学会骶髂关节疾病治疗最佳实践(ASPN)指南
J Pain Res. 2024 May 3;17:1601-1638. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S464393. eCollection 2024.
3
Minimally Invasive SI Joint Fusion Procedures for Chronic SI Joint Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety and Efficacy.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-Term Prospective Clinical And Radiographic Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Lateral Transiliac Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants.使用三角形钛植入物进行微创经髂骨外侧骶髂关节融合术后的长期前瞻性临床和影像学结果
Med Devices (Auckl). 2019 Sep 26;12:411-422. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S219862. eCollection 2019.
2
Randomized Trial of Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis Compared with Conservative Management for Chronic Low Back Pain Attributed to the Sacroiliac Joint.随机对照试验:骶髂关节融合术与保守治疗慢性下腰痛伴骶髂关节病变的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Mar 6;101(5):400-411. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00022.
3
慢性骶髂关节疼痛的微创骶髂关节融合手术:安全性和有效性的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Dec 26;17(6):794-808. doi: 10.14444/8543.
Four-year outcomes after minimally invasive transiliac sacroiliac joint fusion with triangular titanium implants.
采用三角形钛植入物的微创经髂骨骶髂关节融合术后四年的疗效
Med Devices (Auckl). 2018 Aug 29;11:287-289. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S179003. eCollection 2018.
4
Management of Sacroiliac Joint Pain.骶髂关节疼痛的管理。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 Sep 1;26(17):610-616. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00063.
5
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: One Year Clinical and Radiographic Results Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Surgery.骶髂关节融合术:微创骶髂关节融合手术后一年的临床及影像学结果
Open Orthop J. 2016 Nov 30;10:679-689. doi: 10.2174/1874325001610010679. eCollection 2016.
6
Five-year clinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular implants.使用三角形植入物进行微创骶髂关节融合术后的五年临床和影像学结果。
Open Orthop J. 2014 Oct 17;8:375-83. doi: 10.2174/1874325001408010375. eCollection 2014.
7
Sacroiliac joint pain: burden of disease.骶髂关节疼痛:疾病负担
Med Devices (Auckl). 2014 Apr 12;7:73-81. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S59437. eCollection 2014.
8
Open versus minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a multi-center comparison of perioperative measures and clinical outcomes.开放手术与微创骶髂关节融合术:围手术期指标及临床结局的多中心比较
Ann Surg Innov Res. 2013 Oct 30;7(1):14. doi: 10.1186/1750-1164-7-14.
9
How often is low back pain not coming from the back?下背痛并非源于背部的情况有多常见?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jan 1;34(1):E27-32. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818b8882.
10
Poor outcome following bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion for degenerative sacroiliac joint syndrome.双侧骶髂关节融合术治疗退行性骶髂关节综合征后预后不佳。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2006 Jun;72(3):296-308.