• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Prospective meta-analyses and Cochrane's role in embracing next-generation methodologies.

作者信息

Seidler Anna Lene, Hunter Kylie E, Cheyne Saskia, Berlin Jesse A, Ghersi Davina, Askie Lisa M

机构信息

NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Australia.

Johnson & Johnson, USA.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 30;10(10):ED000145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000145.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.ED000145
PMID:33284462
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9414316/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Prospective meta-analyses and Cochrane's role in embracing next-generation methodologies.前瞻性荟萃分析以及Cochrane在采用下一代方法学方面的作用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 30;10(10):ED000145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000145.
2
Cochrane risk of bias tool was used inadequately in the majority of non-Cochrane systematic reviews.Cochrane 偏倚风险工具在大多数非 Cochrane 系统评价中使用不当。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.019. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
3
21st Century Evidence: Randomized Controlled Trials Versus Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.21世纪的证据：随机对照试验与系统评价和荟萃分析
Crit Care Med. 2021 Dec 1;49(12):2001-2002. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005343.
4
Perspective on Systematic Medical Literature Reviews and Meta-Analyses.系统医学文献综述和荟萃分析的视角。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;211:15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.11.028. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
5
Assessments of attrition bias in Cochrane systematic reviews are highly inconsistent and thus hindering trial comparability.对 Cochrane 系统评价中损耗偏倚的评估高度不一致，从而阻碍了试验之间的可比性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Apr 5;19(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0717-9.
6
PRISMA 2020.系统评价与荟萃分析的首选报告项目 2020 版
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:A5-A6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.04.008.
7
Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research.报告元流行病学方法学研究的指南。
Evid Based Med. 2017 Aug;22(4):139-142. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110713. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
8
Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.阿尔茨海默病患者护理干预的系统评价和荟萃分析的报告和方法学质量：研究结果的普遍意义。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019 May;51(3):308-316. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12462. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
9
Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistry.方案注册可提高牙科学系统评价报告质量。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Mar 11;20(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00939-7.
10
Stakeholder Involvement in Systematic Reviews: Lessons From Cochrane's Public Health and Health Systems Network.利益相关者参与系统评价：来自Cochrane公共卫生与卫生系统网络的经验教训
Am J Public Health. 2021 Jul;111(7):1210-1215. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306252.

引用本文的文献

1
Lifecycles of Cochrane Systematic Reviews (2003-2024): A Bibliographic Study.Cochrane系统评价的生命周期（2003 - 2024）：一项文献研究
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2025 Aug 17;3(5):e70043. doi: 10.1002/cesm.70043. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
A Biochemical View on Intermittent Fasting's Effects on Human Physiology-Not Always a Beneficial Strategy.关于间歇性禁食对人体生理影响的生化视角——并非总是有益策略。
Biology (Basel). 2025 Jun 9;14(6):669. doi: 10.3390/biology14060669.
3
Quality of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in pediatric surgery: A cross-sectional meta-research study.小儿外科随机对照试验和系统评价的质量：一项横断面元研究。
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2024 Feb 4;2(2):e12042. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12042. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Efficacy and safety of abaloparatide, denosumab, teriparatide, oral bisphosphonates, and intravenous bisphosphonates in the treatment of male osteoporosis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.阿巴洛肽、地诺单抗、特立帕肽、口服双膦酸盐和静脉注射双膦酸盐治疗男性骨质疏松症的疗效和安全性：一项系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 16;16:1558560. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1558560. eCollection 2025.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart versus Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.德谷胰岛素/门冬胰岛素与门冬胰岛素30治疗2型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性：一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Iran J Public Health. 2024 Feb;53(2):313-322. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v53i2.14916.
6
A Meta-Research of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Mental Health: Comparing Pharmacological to Non-Pharmacological Interventions from 1955 to 2020.心理健康领域随机对照试验的元研究：1955 年至 2020 年比较药物干预与非药物干预
Can J Psychiatry. 2023 Sep;68(9):639-648. doi: 10.1177/07067437231154993. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
7
The landscape of COVID-19 trials in Australia.澳大利亚新冠肺炎试验概况。
Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215(2):58-61.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51148.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantifying the advantages of conducting a prospective meta-analysis (PMA): a case study of early childhood obesity prevention.量化进行前瞻性荟萃分析（PMA）的优势：以幼儿肥胖预防为例的案例研究。
Trials. 2021 Jan 22;22(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04984-x.
2
Association Between Administration of Systemic Corticosteroids and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: A Meta-analysis.COVID-19 重症患者全身使用皮质类固醇与死亡率的关联：一项荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2020 Oct 6;324(13):1330-1341. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.17023.
3
Pooling Data From Individual Clinical Trials in the COVID-19 Era.汇总新冠疫情时代个体临床试验的数据。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 11;324(6):543-545. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.13042.
4
Overwhelming COVID-19 Clinical Trials: Call for Prospective Meta-Analyses.压倒性的新冠病毒临床试验：呼吁进行前瞻性荟萃分析。
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Aug;41(8):501-503. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 May 20.
5
A guide to prospective meta-analysis.前瞻性荟萃分析指南。
BMJ. 2019 Oct 9;367:l5342. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5342.
6
Prevalence of trial registration varies by study characteristics and risk of bias.研究特征和偏倚风险的不同导致试验注册的流行度也不同。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Sep;113:64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 May 20.
7
A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies.预后因素研究的系统评价与Meta分析指南
BMJ. 2019 Jan 30;364:k4597. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4597.
8
Adaptive designs in clinical trials: why use them, and how to run and report them.临床试验中的适应性设计：为何使用它们，以及如何实施和报告它们。
BMC Med. 2018 Feb 28;16(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1017-7.
9
Living systematic review: 1. Introduction-the why, what, when, and how.系统综述的应用：1. 引言——为何、何事、何时、如何。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Nov;91:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
10
Next-generation systematic reviews: prospective meta-analysis, individual-level data, networks and umbrella reviews.下一代系统评价：前瞻性荟萃分析、个体水平数据、网络分析和综合性述评。
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Oct;51(20):1456-1458. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097621. Epub 2017 Feb 21.