• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Unified Theory of Human Judgements and Decision-Making under Uncertainty.不确定性下人类判断与决策的统一理论
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Jul 3;22(7):738. doi: 10.3390/e22070738.
2
Generalizing Prototype Theory: A Formal Quantum Framework.泛化原型理论:一个形式化量子框架。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 30;7:418. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00418. eCollection 2016.
3
Quantum Cognition.量子认知。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2022 Jan 4;73:749-778. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-033020-123501. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
4
Zeno's paradox in decision-making.决策中的芝诺悖论。
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Apr 13;283(1828). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0291.
5
A model of adaptive decision-making from representation of information environment by quantum fields.一种基于量子场对信息环境表征的自适应决策模型。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2017 Nov 13;375(2106). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0162.
6
Compatible quantum theory.相容量子论。
Rep Prog Phys. 2014 Sep;77(9):092001. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/77/9/092001. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
7
Values, decision-making and empirical bioethics: a conceptual model for empirically identifying and analyzing value judgements.价值观、决策与经验生命伦理学:一种用于经验性识别和分析价值判断的概念模型。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2023 Dec;44(6):567-587. doi: 10.1007/s11017-023-09640-4. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
8
Conditions for quantum interference in cognitive sciences.认知科学中的量子干涉条件。
Top Cogn Sci. 2014 Jan;6(1):79-90. doi: 10.1111/tops.12065. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
9
Contextual measurement model and quantum theory.情境测量模型与量子理论。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Mar 20;11(3):231953. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231953. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.避免和识别健康技术评估模型中的错误:定性研究和方法学综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.

引用本文的文献

1
A New Total Uncertainty Measure from A Perspective of Maximum Entropy Requirement.一种基于最大熵要求视角的新的总不确定性度量。
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Aug 17;23(8):1061. doi: 10.3390/e23081061.

本文引用的文献

1
Invariants in probabilistic reasoning.概率推理中的不变量。
Cogn Psychol. 2018 Feb;100:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
2
New fundamental evidence of non-classical structure in the combination of natural concepts.新的基本证据表明,自然概念的组合存在非经典结构。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016 Jan 13;374(2058). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2015.0095.
3
Quantum structure of negation and conjunction in human thought.人类思维中否定与合取的量子结构。
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 30;6:1447. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01447. eCollection 2015.
4
Concepts and their dynamics: a quantum-theoretic modeling of human thought.概念及其动态:人类思维的量子理论建模。
Top Cogn Sci. 2013 Oct;5(4):737-72. doi: 10.1111/tops.12042. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
5
Quantum structure and human thought.量子结构与人类思维。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Jun;36(3):274-6. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12002841.
6
A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.对概率判断错误的量子理论解释。
Psychol Rev. 2011 Apr;118(2):193-218. doi: 10.1037/a0022542.
7
Heuristics made easy: an effort-reduction framework.启发式方法简化:一个减少努力的框架。
Psychol Bull. 2008 Mar;134(2):207-22. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.207.
8
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.《不确定性下的判断:启发式与偏差》
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
9
Judgments under uncertainty: representativeness or potential surprise?不确定性下的判断:代表性还是潜在惊奇?
Br J Psychol. 2002 Nov;93(Pt 4):431-49. doi: 10.1348/000712602761381330.
10
The Disjunction Effect: Does It Exist for Two-Step Gambles?析取效应:两步赌博中是否存在?
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2001 Jul;85(2):250-264. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2942.

不确定性下人类判断与决策的统一理论

A Unified Theory of Human Judgements and Decision-Making under Uncertainty.

作者信息

Pisano Raffaele, Sozzo Sandro

机构信息

Institute of Electronics, Microelectronics and Nanotechnology (IEMN), Lille University, Avenue Poincaré CS 60069, CEDEX, 59652 Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.

School of Business and Centre for Quantum Social and Cognitive Science (IQSCS), University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.

出版信息

Entropy (Basel). 2020 Jul 3;22(7):738. doi: 10.3390/e22070738.

DOI:10.3390/e22070738
PMID:33286509
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7517281/
Abstract

Growing empirical evidence reveals that traditional set-theoretic structures cannot in general be applied to cognitive phenomena. This has raised several problems, as illustrated, for example, by probability judgement errors and decision-making (DM) errors. We propose here a unified theoretical perspective which applies the mathematical formalism of quantum theory in Hilbert space to cognitive domains. In this perspective, judgements and decisions are described as intrinsically non-deterministic processes which involve a contextual interaction between a conceptual entity and the cognitive context surrounding it. When a given phenomenon is considered, the quantum-theoretic framework identifies entities, states, contexts, properties and outcome statistics, and applies the mathematical formalism of quantum theory to model the considered phenomenon. We explain how the quantum-theoretic framework works in a variety of judgement and decision situations where systematic and significant deviations from classicality occur.

摘要

越来越多的实证证据表明,传统的集合论结构通常不能应用于认知现象。这引发了几个问题,例如概率判断错误和决策(DM)错误所表明的那样。我们在此提出一种统一的理论观点,即将希尔伯特空间中量子理论的数学形式应用于认知领域。从这个角度来看,判断和决策被描述为本质上非确定性的过程,涉及概念实体与其周围认知背景之间的情境交互。当考虑给定现象时,量子理论框架识别实体、状态、背景、属性和结果统计,并应用量子理论的数学形式对所考虑的现象进行建模。我们解释了量子理论框架在各种判断和决策情境中是如何运作的,在这些情境中会出现与经典情况的系统性和显著偏差。