Angelidis Georgios, Ioannidis Evangelos, Makris Georgios, Antoniou Ioannis, Varsakelis Nikos
School of Economics, Faculty of Economic and Political Sciences, Complex Systems Analysis Laboratory (COSAL), Laboratory of Economic Analysis and Policy (LEAP), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Sep 23;22(10):1068. doi: 10.3390/e22101068.
We investigated competitive conditions in global value chains (GVCs) for a period of fifteen years (2000-2014), focusing on sector structure, countries' dominance and diversification. For this purpose, we used data from the World Input-Output Database (WIOD) and examined GVCs as weighted directed networks, where countries are the nodes and value added flows are the edges. We compared the in-and out-weighted degree centralization of the sectoral GVC networks in order to detect the most centralized, on the import or export side, respectively (oligopsonies and oligopolies). Moreover, we examined the in- and out-weighted degree centrality and the in- and out-weight entropy in order to determine whether dominant countries are also diversified. The empirical results reveal that diversification (entropy) and dominance (degree) are not correlated. Dominant countries (rich) become more dominant (richer). Diversification is not conditioned by competitiveness.
我们对全球价值链(GVCs)长达十五年(2000 - 2014年)的竞争状况进行了调查,重点关注行业结构、各国的主导地位和多元化。为此,我们使用了世界投入产出数据库(WIOD)的数据,并将全球价值链视为加权有向网络,其中国家为节点,增加值流动为边。我们比较了各行业全球价值链网络的入度和出度加权中心性,以便分别检测在进口或出口方面最集中的情况(买方寡头垄断和卖方寡头垄断)。此外,我们还研究了入度和出度加权中心性以及入度和出度加权熵,以确定主导国家是否也具有多元化。实证结果表明,多元化(熵)和主导地位(度)并不相关。主导国家(富裕国家)变得更加主导(更加富裕)。多元化并不取决于竞争力。