• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情期间重症监护室分诊方案的伦理建议:荷兰的经验教训

Ethical Advice for an Intensive Care Triage Protocol in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned from The Netherlands.

作者信息

Verweij Marcel, van de Vathorst Suzanne, Schermer Maartje, Willems Dick, de Vries Martine

机构信息

Philosophy Group, Wageningen University.

Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC.

出版信息

Public Health Ethics. 2020 Sep 3;13(2):157-165. doi: 10.1093/phe/phaa027. eCollection 2020 Jul.

DOI:10.1093/phe/phaa027
PMID:33288984
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7499738/
Abstract

At the height of the COVID-19 crisis in the Netherlands a shortness of intensive care beds was looming. Dutch professional medical organizations asked a group of ethicists for assistance in drafting guidelines and criteria for selection of patients for intensive care (IC) treatment in case of absolute scarcity, when medical selection criteria would no longer suffice. This article describes the Dutch context, the process of drafting the advice and reflects on the role of ethicists and lessons learned. We argue that timely interaction between clinical and ethical expertise is necessary since the distinction between medical and non-medical considerations is not as clearcut as sometimes assumed. Furthermore, pragmatic considerations related to the specifics of an epidemic are of importance, for example, in relation to prioritizing health care workers. As a consequence, any protocol already present before the pandemic would need alterations to fit the current situation. The 'fair innings' criterion we proposed, rephrased as an argument of intergenerational solidarity, was considered reasonable by professionals as well as patient organizations. While it is desirable to draft ethical guidelines in 'peacetime' as a matter of pandemic preparedness, the pressure of an actual crisis facilitates decision-making, although it will also complicate a more democratic approach.

摘要

在荷兰新冠疫情危机最严重的时候,重症监护床位短缺的问题日益凸显。荷兰专业医学组织请求一群伦理学家协助起草在绝对稀缺情况下(即医学选择标准不再适用时)挑选重症监护(IC)治疗患者的指导方针和标准。本文描述了荷兰的背景情况、起草建议的过程,并反思了伦理学家的作用以及汲取的经验教训。我们认为,临床专业知识和伦理专业知识之间的及时互动是必要的,因为医学考量和非医学考量之间的区别并不像有时设想的那么清晰。此外,与疫情具体情况相关的务实考量也很重要,例如在确定医护人员的优先顺序方面。因此,疫情之前已有的任何方案都需要进行调整以适应当前形势。我们提出的“公平寿限”标准,重新表述为代际团结的论点,被专业人士和患者组织认为是合理的。虽然在“和平时期”起草伦理指导方针作为大流行防范措施是可取的,但实际危机带来的压力有助于决策,尽管这也会使更民主的方法变得复杂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/729f/7700795/5015acbbb247/phaa027f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/729f/7700795/5015acbbb247/phaa027f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/729f/7700795/5015acbbb247/phaa027f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Ethical Advice for an Intensive Care Triage Protocol in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned from The Netherlands.新冠疫情期间重症监护室分诊方案的伦理建议:荷兰的经验教训
Public Health Ethics. 2020 Sep 3;13(2):157-165. doi: 10.1093/phe/phaa027. eCollection 2020 Jul.
2
Withdrawal of intensive care during times of severe scarcity: Triage during a pandemic only upon arrival or with the inclusion of patients who are already under treatment?严重短缺时期的重症监护撤离:大流行期间仅在到达时进行分诊,还是包括已经接受治疗的患者?
Bioethics. 2021 Feb;35(2):118-124. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12837. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
3
[Using pandemic guidelines in simulated triage sessions. Preliminary observations and lessons learned].[在模拟分诊环节中使用大流行指南。初步观察结果与经验教训]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2021 Sep 8;165:D6135.
4
[Ethical guides, criteria for admission in intensive care, palliative care. Multi-society recommendations for allocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic].[伦理指南、重症监护与姑息治疗的收治标准。多学会关于新冠疫情期间资源分配的建议]
Medicina (B Aires). 2020;80 Suppl 3:45-64.
5
Developing a Triage Protocol for the COVID-19 Pandemic: Allocating Scarce Medical Resources in a Public Health Emergency.制定COVID-19大流行的分诊方案:在突发公共卫生事件中分配稀缺医疗资源
J Clin Ethics. 2020 Winter;31(4):303-317.
6
Triage Decisions in the Context of COVID-19: Old Burden, New Challenge-The Structured Approach for Intensive Care Unit Triage (SAINT) Protocol.COVID-19 背景下的分诊决策:旧负担,新挑战——重症监护病房分诊的结构化方法(SAINT)协议。
Mil Med. 2021 Feb 26;186(3-4):e300-e304. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa287.
7
[Health professionals facing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: What are the mental health risks?].面对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的卫生专业人员:心理健康风险有哪些?
Encephale. 2020 Jun;46(3S):S73-S80. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.04.008. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
8
Should age matter in COVID-19 triage? A deliberative study.在新冠病毒疾病分诊中年龄重要吗?一项审议性研究。
J Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 9;47(5):291-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107071.
9
Supporting Decision Making in Intensive Care: Ethical Principles for Managing Access to Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic.重症监护中的支持性决策:COVID-19大流行期间管理医疗服务可及性的伦理原则
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 3;8:787805. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.787805. eCollection 2021.
10
Recommendations on COVID-19 triage: international comparison and ethical analysis.关于 COVID-19 分诊的建议:国际比较与伦理分析。
Bioethics. 2020 Nov;34(9):948-959. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12805. Epub 2020 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Increased red cell distribution width predicts mortality in COVID-19 patients admitted to a Dutch intensive care unit.红细胞分布宽度增加可预测入住荷兰重症监护病房的COVID-19患者的死亡率。
Acute Crit Care. 2024 Aug;39(3):359-368. doi: 10.4266/acc.2023.01137. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
2
Making things specific: towards an anthropology of everyday ethics in healthcare.细化研究对象:迈向医疗保健日常伦理的人类学研究
Med Health Care Philos. 2024 Sep;27(3):309-319. doi: 10.1007/s11019-024-10204-z. Epub 2024 May 1.
3
What are the views of Quebec and Ontario citizens on the tiebreaker criteria for prioritizing access to adult critical care in the extreme context of a COVID-19 pandemic?

本文引用的文献

1
Ventilator Triage Policies During the COVID-19 Pandemic at U.S. Hospitals Associated With Members of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors.COVID-19 大流行期间美国医院与生物伦理计划主任协会成员相关的呼吸机分类政策。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Aug 4;173(3):188-194. doi: 10.7326/M20-1738. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
2
Hospitalization Rates and Characteristics of Patients Hospitalized with Laboratory-Confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019 - COVID-NET, 14 States, March 1-30, 2020.2020 年 3 月 1 日至 30 日,14 个州住院的经实验室确诊的 2019 冠状病毒病患者的住院率和特征 - COVID-NET。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 17;69(15):458-464. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6915e3.
3
在 COVID-19 大流行的极端情况下,魁北克省和安大略省公民对成人重症监护优先排序的决胜标准有何看法?
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Mar 19;25(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01030-2.
4
The development of Dutch COVID-19 ICU triage guidelines from an institutional work perspective.从制度工作视角看荷兰 COVID-19 重症监护室分诊指南的制定。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 14;18(9):e0291075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291075. eCollection 2023.
5
Age-specific severity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in February 2020 to June 2021 in the Netherlands.2020 年 2 月至 2021 年 6 月期间荷兰不同年龄段严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型的严重程度。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2023 Aug 22;17(8):e13174. doi: 10.1111/irv.13174. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Public voices on tie-breaking criteria and underlying values in COVID-19 triage protocols to access critical care: a scoping review.关于新冠疫情重症监护分诊方案中打破平局标准及潜在价值观的公众声音:一项范围综述
Discov Health Syst. 2023;2(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s44250-023-00027-9. Epub 2023 May 10.
7
Real-world Evidence of the Effects of Novel Treatments for COVID-19 on Mortality: A Nationwide Comparative Cohort Study of Hospitalized Patients in the First, Second, Third, and Fourth Waves in the Netherlands.新型 COVID-19 治疗方法对死亡率影响的真实世界证据:荷兰第一、二、三、四波疫情中住院患者的全国性比较队列研究
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Nov 22;9(12):ofac632. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac632. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
How should ICU beds be allocated during a crisis? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic.在危机期间应如何分配 ICU 床位?来自 COVID-19 大流行的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 10;17(8):e0270996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270996. eCollection 2022.
9
Identification of the most vulnerable populations in the psychosocial sphere: a cross-sectional study conducted in Catalonia during the strict lockdown imposed against the COVID-19 pandemic.识别社会心理领域最脆弱的人群:在 COVID-19 大流行期间对加泰罗尼亚实施严格封锁期间进行的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 26;11(11):e052140. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052140.
10
COVID-19: Public health issues and ethical dilemmas.新型冠状病毒肺炎:公共卫生问题与伦理困境
Ethics Med Public Health. 2021 Jun;17:100635. doi: 10.1016/j.jemep.2021.100635. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19.
新冠疫情期间稀缺医疗资源的公平分配
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2049-2055. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb2005114. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
4
Frailty predicts 30-day mortality in intensive care patients: A prospective prediction study.衰弱预测重症监护患者 30 天死亡率:一项前瞻性预测研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Nov;37(11):1058-1065. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001156.
5
The contribution of frailty, cognition, activity of daily life and comorbidities on outcome in acutely admitted patients over 80 years in European ICUs: the VIP2 study.欧洲重症监护病房中80岁以上急性入院患者的衰弱、认知、日常生活活动能力及共病对预后的影响:VIP2研究
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jan;46(1):57-69. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05853-1. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
6
Too Many Patients…A Framework to Guide Statewide Allocation of Scarce Mechanical Ventilation During Disasters.患者过多……指导全州在灾害期间稀缺机械通气资源分配的框架。
Chest. 2019 Apr;155(4):848-854. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.09.025. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
7
Triage: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement.分诊:大流行和灾难期间危重症患者及受伤者的护理:CHEST共识声明
Chest. 2014 Oct;146(4 Suppl):e61S-74S. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0736.
8
The variability of critical care bed numbers in Europe.欧洲重症监护病床数量的变化。
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Oct;38(10):1647-53. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2627-8. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
9
Enhancing the fairness of pandemic critical care triage.提升疫情关键护理分诊的公平性。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Dec;36(12):758-61. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.035501. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
10
General practitioner awareness of preferred place of death and correlates of dying in a preferred place: a nationwide mortality follow-back study in the Netherlands.全科医生对首选死亡地点的认知及其与首选地点死亡的相关性:荷兰全国死亡率随访研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Oct;38(4):568-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.12.007. Epub 2009 Aug 18.