Laboratory for Integrative Biodiversity Research (LIBRe), Finnish Museum of Natural History (LUOMUS), University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, Finland.
Water Research Institute (IRSA), National Research Council (CNR), 28922 Verbania Pallanza, Italy.
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Dec 9;287(1940):20202166. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2166.
Through the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) and the financial investments of the LIFE projects, Europe has become an experimental arena for biological conservation. With an estimated annual budget of €20 billion, the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 has set an ambitious goal of classifying 30% of its land and sea territory as Protected Areas and ensuring no deterioration in conservation trends and the status of protected species. We analysed LIFE projects focused on animals from 1992 to 2018 and found that investment in vertebrates was six times higher than that for invertebrates (€970 versus €150 million), with birds and mammals alone accounting for 72% of species and 75% of the total budget. In relative terms, investment per species towards vertebrates has been 468 times higher than that for invertebrates. Using a trait-based approach, we show that conservation effort is primarily explained by species' popularity rather than extinction risk or body size. Therefore, we propose a roadmap to achieve unbiased conservation targets for 2030 and beyond.
通过《栖息地指令》(92/43/EEC)和 LIFE 项目的财政投资,欧洲已成为生物保护的试验区。欧盟 2030 年生物多样性战略的目标是雄心勃勃的,即把其 30%的陆地和海洋领土划分为保护区,并确保保护趋势和受保护物种的地位不恶化。我们分析了 1992 年至 2018 年专注于动物的 LIFE 项目,发现对脊椎动物的投资是无脊椎动物的六倍(9.70 亿欧元对 1.5 亿欧元),仅鸟类和哺乳动物就占物种的 72%和总预算的 75%。相对而言,脊椎动物的每个物种的投资是无脊椎动物的 468 倍。我们采用基于特征的方法表明,保护工作主要是由物种的知名度决定的,而不是灭绝风险或体型。因此,我们提出了一条实现 2030 年及以后无偏差保护目标的路线图。