Tucker Joshua, Whitehead Lisa, Palamara Peter, Rosman Josephine Xenia, Seaman Karla
Albany Health Campus, 30 Warden Avenue, Spencer Park, Western Australia, 6330, Australia.
Centre for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Services Research, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Building 21, Level 4, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, Western Australia, 6027, Australia.
BMC Nurs. 2020 Nov 10;19(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-00495-x.
Agitation among patients is a common and distressing behaviour across a variety of health care settings, particularly inpatient mental health. Unless recognised early and effectively managed it can lead to aggression and personal injury. The aim of this paper is to explore the experiences of mental health nurses in recognising and managing agitation in an inpatient mental health setting and the alignment of these experiences with best practice and person-centred care.
This study used a descriptive qualitative methodology. Semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted with 20 nurses working in a mental health unit in 2018. Nursing staff described their experiences of assessing and managing agitation. Descriptive and Thematic Analysis were undertaken of the transcribed focus group dialogue.
Nurses combined their clinical knowledge, assessment protocols and training with information from patients to make an individualised assessment of agitation. Nurses also adopted an individualised approach to management by engaging patients in decisions about their care. In keeping with best practice recommendations, de-escalation strategies were the first choice option for management, though nurses also described using both coercive restraint and medication under certain circumstances. From the perspective of patient-centred care, the care provided aligned with elements of person-centred care nursing care.
The findings suggest that clinical mental health nurses assess and manage agitation, with certain exceptions, in line with best practice and a person-centred care nursing framework.
患者的躁动是各类医疗环境中常见且令人苦恼的行为,尤其是在住院心理健康护理中。除非能早期识别并有效管理,否则可能导致攻击行为和人身伤害。本文旨在探讨心理健康护士在住院心理健康环境中识别和管理躁动的经验,以及这些经验与最佳实践和以患者为中心的护理的契合度。
本研究采用描述性定性方法。2018年,对一家心理健康科室的20名护士进行了半结构化焦点小组访谈。护理人员描述了他们评估和管理躁动的经验。对转录的焦点小组对话进行了描述性和主题分析。
护士将他们的临床知识、评估方案和培训与来自患者的信息相结合,对躁动进行个体化评估。护士还通过让患者参与有关其护理的决策,采取了个体化的管理方法。与最佳实践建议一致,降级策略是管理的首选选项,不过护士们也描述了在某些情况下使用强制约束和药物治疗。从以患者为中心的护理角度来看,所提供的护理与以患者为中心的护理要素相符。
研究结果表明,临床心理健康护士在评估和管理躁动方面,除某些例外情况外,符合最佳实践和以患者为中心的护理框架。