Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark.
Thorax. 2021 Apr;76(4):370-379. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215768. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
To examine the impact of ACE inhibitor (ACE-I)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) use on rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection and adverse outcomes.
This nationwide case-control and cohort study included all individuals in Denmark tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA with PCR from 27 February 2020 to 26 July 2020. We estimated confounder-adjusted ORs for a positive test among all SARS-CoV-2 tested, and inverse probability of treatment weighted 30-day risk and risk ratios (RRs) of hospitalisation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality comparing current ACE-I/ARB use with calcium channel blocker (CCB) use and with non-use.
The study included 13 501 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive and 1 088 695 PCR-negative individuals. Users of ACE-I/ARB had a marginally increased rate of a positive PCR when compared with CCB users (aOR 1.17, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.37), but not when compared with non-users (aOR 1.00 95% CI 0.92 to 1.09).Among PCR-positive individuals, 1466 (11%) were ACE-I/ARB users. The weighted risk of hospitalisation was 36.5% in ACE-I/ARB users and 43.3% in CCB users (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.02). The risk of ICU admission was 6.3% in ACE-I/ARB users and 5.4% in CCB users (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.16), while the 30-day mortality was 12.3% in ACE-I/ARB users and 13.9% in CCB users (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.30). The associations were similar when ACE-I/ARB users were compared with non-users.
ACE-I/ARB use was associated neither with a consistently increased rate nor with adverse outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our findings support the current recommendation of continuing use of ACE-Is/ARBs during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
EUPAS34887.
研究血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)的使用对 SARS-CoV-2 感染率和不良结局的影响。
本项全国范围内的病例对照和队列研究纳入了 2020 年 2 月 27 日至 2020 年 7 月 26 日期间接受过 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测的所有丹麦个体。我们估计了所有接受 SARS-CoV-2 检测的个体中,阳性检测结果的混杂因素调整比值比(OR),并使用逆概率治疗加权法比较了 ACEI/ARB 与钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)和非 ACEI/ARB 使用者在 30 天内住院、入住重症监护病房(ICU)和死亡的风险比(RR)。
研究纳入了 13501 例 SARS-CoV-2 PCR 阳性和 1088695 例 PCR 阴性个体。与 CCB 使用者相比,ACEI/ARB 使用者的 SARS-CoV-2 PCR 阳性率略有升高(调整 OR 1.17,95%置信区间 1.00 至 1.37),但与非 ACEI/ARB 使用者相比则无差异(调整 OR 1.00,95%置信区间 0.92 至 1.09)。在 SARS-CoV-2 PCR 阳性个体中,1466 例(11%)为 ACEI/ARB 使用者。ACEI/ARB 使用者的住院风险加权为 36.5%,CCB 使用者的住院风险加权为 43.3%(RR 0.84,95%置信区间 0.70 至 1.02)。ACEI/ARB 使用者的 ICU 入住风险为 6.3%,CCB 使用者的 ICU 入住风险为 5.4%(RR 1.17,95%置信区间 0.64 至 2.16),而 30 天死亡率在 ACEI/ARB 使用者中为 12.3%,在 CCB 使用者中为 13.9%(RR 0.89,95%置信区间 0.61 至 1.30)。当 ACEI/ARB 使用者与非 ACEI/ARB 使用者进行比较时,这些关联也相似。
ACEI/ARB 的使用与 SARS-CoV-2 感染率或不良结局的增加均无关联。我们的研究结果支持在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间继续使用 ACEIs/ARBs 的当前建议。
EUPAS34887。