Suppr超能文献

给药途径对胰腺癌小鼠树突状细胞疫苗疗效的影响。

Effect of route of administration on the efficacy of dendritic cell vaccine in PDAC mice.

作者信息

Yang Jia, Eresen Aydin, Shangguan Junjie, Ma Quanhong, Zhang Zhuoli, Yaghmai Vahid

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cancer Res. 2020 Nov 1;10(11):3911-3919. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

It is unknown whether the route of administration impacts dendritic cell (DC)-based immunotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We compared the effect of intraperitoneal (i.p.), subcutaneous (s.c.), and intratumoral (i.t.) administration of DC vaccine on induction of antitumor responses in a KPC mouse model of PDAC. Histological analysis and flow cytometry were used to evaluate tumor progression and antitumor immunity after different routes of DC vaccination. Using a flank mouse model of PDAC, we found that the i.t. route of DC vaccination had no significant effect on tumor growth rates compared with i.p. and s.c. routes (i.p. 6.66 ± 2.58% vs s.c. 6.79 ± 1.36% vs i.t. 8.57 ± 2.36%; P = 0.33). However, in an orthotopic PDAC model, i.p. injection of DC vaccine effectively suppressed tumor growth, inhibited tumor progression, and increased antitumor immunity compared with s.c. vaccination (tumor weight: i.p. 71.60 ± 15.55 mg vs control 200.40 ± 53.04 mg; P = 0.048; s.c. 151.40 ± 41.64 mg vs control 200.40 ± 53.04 mg; P = 0.49). Our study suggests that immunization via an i.p. route results in superior antitumor immune response and tumor suppression when compared with other routes.

摘要

给药途径是否会影响基于树突状细胞(DC)的胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)免疫治疗尚不清楚。我们比较了腹腔内(i.p.)、皮下(s.c.)和瘤内(i.t.)注射DC疫苗对PDAC的KPC小鼠模型中抗肿瘤反应诱导的影响。采用组织学分析和流式细胞术评估不同DC疫苗接种途径后的肿瘤进展和抗肿瘤免疫。使用PDAC的侧腹小鼠模型,我们发现与i.p.和s.c.途径相比,i.t.途径的DC疫苗接种对肿瘤生长速率没有显著影响(i.p. 6.66±2.58% vs s.c. 6.79±1.36% vs i.t. 8.57±2.36%;P = 0.33)。然而,在原位PDAC模型中,与s.c.接种相比,i.p.注射DC疫苗可有效抑制肿瘤生长、抑制肿瘤进展并增强抗肿瘤免疫(肿瘤重量:i.p. 71.60±15.55 mg vs对照200.40±53.04 mg;P = 0.048;s.c. 151.40±41.64 mg vs对照200.40±53.04 mg;P = 0.49)。我们的研究表明,与其他途径相比,通过i.p.途径进行免疫可产生更好的抗肿瘤免疫反应和肿瘤抑制效果。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Cancer vaccines in the clinic.临床中的癌症疫苗
Bioeng Transl Med. 2023 Oct 27;9(1):e10588. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10588. eCollection 2024 Jan.

本文引用的文献

10
Germline mutations in pancreatic cancer become better defined.胰腺癌中的种系突变得到了更明确的界定。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Mar-Apr;66(2):93-4. doi: 10.3322/caac.21300. Epub 2016 Jan 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验