• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估埃塞俄比亚高原中部反刍动物和人类遗传微生物源追踪标记物的粪便源敏感性和特异性。

Assessing the faecal source sensitivity and specificity of ruminant and human genetic microbial source tracking markers in the central Ethiopian highlands.

机构信息

Research Group of Environmental Microbiology and Molecular Diagnostics, Institute for Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering, Technical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Biological Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Lett Appl Microbiol. 2021 Apr;72(4):458-466. doi: 10.1111/lam.13436. Epub 2020 Dec 24.

DOI:10.1111/lam.13436
PMID:33300161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7986238/
Abstract

This study tested genetic microbial source tracking (MST) methods for identifying ruminant- (BacR) and human-associated (HF183/BacR287, BacHum) bacterial faecal contaminants in Ethiopia in a newly created regional faecal sample bank (n = 173). BacR performed well, and its marker abundance was high (100% sensitivity (Sens), 95% specificity (Spec), median log 8·1 marker equivalents (ME) g ruminant faeces). Human-associated markers tested were less abundant in individual human samples (median: log 5·4 and 4·2 (ME + 1) g ) and were not continuously detected (81% Sens, 91% Spec for BacHum; 77% Sens, 91% Spec for HF183/BacR287). Furthermore, the pig-associated Pig2Bac assay was included and performed excellent (100% Sens, 100% Spec). To evaluate the presence of MST targets in the soil microbiome, representative soil samples were tested during a whole seasonal cycle (n = 60). Only BacR could be detected, but was limited to the dry season and to sites of higher anthropogenic influence (log 3·0 to 4·9 (ME + 1) g soil). In conclusion, the large differences in marker abundances between target and non-target faecal samples (median distances between distributions ≥log 3 to ≥log 7) and their absence in pristine soil indicate that all tested assays are suitable candidates for diverse MST applications in the Ethiopian area.

摘要

本研究测试了遗传微生物源追踪(MST)方法,以鉴定在埃塞俄比亚新创建的区域粪便样本库中的反刍动物(BacR)和人类相关(HF183/BacR287、BacHum)细菌粪便污染物(n=173)。BacR 表现良好,其标记丰度较高(100%灵敏度(Sens)、95%特异性(Spec)、中位数 log 8·1 标记等价物(ME)g 反刍动物粪便)。测试的人类相关标记在个体人类样本中的丰度较低(中位数:log 5·4 和 4·2(ME+1)g),并且不能连续检测到(BacHum 的 81% Sens、91% Spec;HF183/BacR287 的 77% Sens、91% Spec)。此外,还包括了猪相关的 Pig2Bac 检测方法,并且表现出色(100% Sens、100% Spec)。为了评估 MST 目标在土壤微生物组中的存在情况,在整个季节性周期中测试了代表性土壤样本(n=60)。仅能检测到 BacR,但仅限于旱季和人为影响较高的地点(log 3·0 至 4·9(ME+1)g 土壤)。总之,目标和非目标粪便样本之间标记丰度的巨大差异(分布之间的中位数距离≥log 3 至≥log 7)以及它们在原始土壤中的缺失表明,所有测试的检测方法都适合在埃塞俄比亚地区进行多种 MST 应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/539a/7986238/150573a92b40/LAM-72-458-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/539a/7986238/150573a92b40/LAM-72-458-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/539a/7986238/150573a92b40/LAM-72-458-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the faecal source sensitivity and specificity of ruminant and human genetic microbial source tracking markers in the central Ethiopian highlands.评估埃塞俄比亚高原中部反刍动物和人类遗传微生物源追踪标记物的粪便源敏感性和特异性。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2021 Apr;72(4):458-466. doi: 10.1111/lam.13436. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
2
Validation of host-specific Bacteroidales quantitative PCR assays and their application to microbial source tracking of drinking water sources in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal.验证针对特定宿主的拟杆菌定量 PCR 检测方法及其在尼泊尔加德满都谷地饮用水源微生物溯源中的应用。
J Appl Microbiol. 2018 Aug;125(2):609-619. doi: 10.1111/jam.13884. Epub 2018 May 23.
3
Performance of forty-one microbial source tracking methods: a twenty-seven lab evaluation study.41 种微生物源追踪方法的性能评估:一项 27 个实验室的评估研究。
Water Res. 2013 Nov 15;47(18):6812-28. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.12.046. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
4
Quantitative microbial faecal source tracking with sampling guided by hydrological catchment dynamics.基于水文集水区动态引导采样的定量微生物粪便来源追踪
Environ Microbiol. 2008 Oct;10(10):2598-608. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01682.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
5
Assessment and application of host-specific Bacteroidales genetic markers for microbial source tracking of river water in Japan.日本河水中微生物溯源的宿主特异性拟杆菌门遗传标记的评估和应用。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 16;13(11):e0207727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207727. eCollection 2018.
6
Incorporating expert judgments in utility evaluation of bacteroidales qPCR assays for microbial source tracking in a drinking water source.将专家判断纳入用于饮用水源微生物溯源的拟杆菌qPCR检测效用评估中。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Feb 3;49(3):1311-8. doi: 10.1021/es504579j. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
7
Phylogenetic analysis of Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene sequences from human and animal effluents and assessment of ruminant faecal pollution by real-time PCR.从人和动物污水中提取的拟杆菌门 16S rRNA 基因序列的系统发育分析,以及实时 PCR 评估反刍动物粪便污染。
J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Mar;108(3):974-984. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04499.x. Epub 2009 Jul 25.
8
Occurrence of human-associated Bacteroidetes genetic source tracking markers in raw and treated wastewater of municipal and domestic origin and comparison to standard and alternative indicators of faecal pollution.城市和生活源原水及处理后废水中人类相关拟杆菌属基因溯源标志物的出现情况以及与粪便污染标准指标和替代指标的比较。
Water Res. 2016 Mar 1;90:265-276. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.12.031. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
9
Validation and application of high-throughput quantitative PCR for the simultaneous detection of microbial source tracking markers in environmental water.高通量实时定量 PCR 技术用于同时检测环境水样中微生物源追踪标记物的验证和应用。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Aug 25;940:173604. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173604. Epub 2024 May 29.
10
Comparison of Microbial and Chemical Source Tracking Markers To Identify Fecal Contamination Sources in the Humber River (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and Associated Storm Water Outfalls.微生物和化学源追踪标志物用于识别加拿大安大略省多伦多亨伯河及其相关雨水排放口粪便污染源的比较
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Oct 14;82(21):6357-6366. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01675-16. Print 2016 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Microbial source tracking of human and animal fecal contamination in Ecuadorian households.厄瓜多尔家庭中人类和动物粪便污染的微生物源追踪
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 23:2025.08.22.671888. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.22.671888.
2
Assessing the nucleic acid decay of human wastewater markers and enteric viruses in estuarine waters in Sydney, Australia.评估澳大利亚悉尼河口水中的人类污水标志物和肠道病毒的核酸衰减。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 May 20;926:171389. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171389. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
3
An overview of molecular markers for identification of non-human fecal pollution sources.

本文引用的文献

1
Performance of host-associated genetic markers for microbial source tracking in China.宿主相关遗传标记在我国微生物溯源中的性能。
Water Res. 2020 May 15;175:115670. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115670. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
2
Human fecal contamination of water, soil, and surfaces in households sharing poor-quality sanitation facilities in Maputo, Mozambique.莫桑比克马普托市卫生条件较差的家庭中,水、土壤和表面存在人体粪便污染。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2020 May;226:113496. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113496. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
3
Ecological and Technical Mechanisms for Cross-Reaction of Human Fecal Indicators with Animal Hosts.
用于识别非人类粪便污染源的分子标记概述。
Front Microbiol. 2023 Nov 23;14:1256174. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1256174. eCollection 2023.
4
Applicability of F-specific bacteriophage subgroups, PMMoV and crAssphage as indicators of source specific fecal contamination and viral inactivation in rivers in Japan.F 特异性噬菌体亚群、PMMoV 和 crAssphage 在指示日本河流中特定来源粪便污染和病毒失活中的适用性。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 14;18(7):e0288454. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288454. eCollection 2023.
5
Have genetic targets for faecal pollution diagnostics and source tracking revolutionized water quality analysis yet?粪便污染诊断和溯源的遗传靶标是否已经彻底改变了水质分析?
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2023 Jul 5;47(4). doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuad028.
人类粪便指示剂与动物宿主交叉反应的生态和技术机制。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020 Feb 18;86(5). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02319-19.
4
Microbial Source Tracking Using 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing Identifies Evidence of Widespread Contamination from Young Children's Feces in an Urban Slum of Nairobi, Kenya.使用 16S rRNA 扩增子测序进行微生物源追踪,在肯尼亚内罗毕的一个城市贫民窟中发现了幼儿粪便广泛污染的证据。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Jul 16;53(14):8271-8281. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06583. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
5
Host Specificity and Sensitivity of Established and Novel Sewage-Associated Marker Genes in Human and Nonhuman Fecal Samples.建立和新型粪便相关标记基因在人类和非人类粪便样本中的宿主特异性和敏感性。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019 Jul 1;85(14). doi: 10.1128/AEM.00641-19. Print 2019 Jul 15.
6
Human and animal microbial source tracking in a tropical river with multiple land use activities.热带河流水体中多土地利用活动下的人类和动物微生物源追踪。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2019 May;222(4):645-654. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
7
Human-Associated Lachnospiraceae Genetic Markers Improve Detection of Fecal Pollution Sources in Urban Waters.人类相关lachnospiraceae 遗传标记提高城市水体粪便污染来源的检测。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Jul 2;84(14). doi: 10.1128/AEM.00309-18. Print 2018 Jul 15.
8
Validation of host-specific Bacteroidales quantitative PCR assays and their application to microbial source tracking of drinking water sources in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal.验证针对特定宿主的拟杆菌定量 PCR 检测方法及其在尼泊尔加德满都谷地饮用水源微生物溯源中的应用。
J Appl Microbiol. 2018 Aug;125(2):609-619. doi: 10.1111/jam.13884. Epub 2018 May 23.
9
Global Distribution of Human-Associated Fecal Genetic Markers in Reference Samples from Six Continents.全球六大陆参考样本中人源粪便遗传标记的分布。
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 May 1;52(9):5076-5084. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b04438. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
10
Comparison of the Performance of Different Microbial Source Tracking Markers among European and North African Regions.欧洲和北非地区不同微生物源追踪标志物性能的比较
J Environ Qual. 2017 Jul;46(4):760-766. doi: 10.2134/jeq2016.11.0432.