• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在难民营中控制 COVID-19 疫情的干预措施建模。

Modelling interventions to control COVID-19 outbreaks in a refugee camp.

机构信息

Centre for Crisis Studies and Mitigation, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Dec;5(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003727.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003727
PMID:33303516
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7733233/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the absence of effective treatments or vaccines, non-pharmaceutical interventions are the mainstay of control in the COVID-19 pandemic. Refugee populations in displacement camps live under adverse conditions that are likely to favour the spread of disease. To date, only a few cases of COVID-19 have appeared in refugee camps, and whether feasible non-pharmaceutical interventions can prevent the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in such settings remains untested.

METHODS

We constructed the first spatially explicit agent-based model of a COVID-19 outbreak in a refugee camp, and applied it to evaluate feasible non-pharmaceutical interventions. We parameterised the model using published data on the transmission rates and progression dynamics of COVID-19, and demographic and spatial data from Europe's largest refugee camp, the Moria displacement camp on Lesbos, Greece. We simulated COVID-19 epidemics with and without four feasible interventions.

RESULTS

Spatial subdivision of the camp ('sectoring') was able to 'flatten the curve', reducing peak infection by up to 70% and delaying peak infection by up to several months. The use of face masks coupled with the efficient isolation of infected individuals reduced the overall incidence of infection, and sometimes averted epidemics altogether. These interventions must be implemented quickly in order to be maximally effective. Lockdowns had only small effects on COVID-19 dynamics.

CONCLUSIONS

Agent-based models are powerful tools for forecasting the spread of disease in spatially structured and heterogeneous populations. Our findings suggest that feasible interventions can slow the spread of COVID-19 in a refugee camp setting, and provide an evidence base for camp managers planning intervention strategies. Our model can be modified to study other closed populations at risk from COVID-19 or future epidemics.

摘要

背景

在缺乏有效治疗方法或疫苗的情况下,非药物干预措施是 COVID-19 大流行防控的主要手段。难民营中的难民生活在可能有利于疾病传播的不利条件下。迄今为止,难民营中仅出现少数几例 COVID-19 病例,在这种环境下是否可行的非药物干预措施可以阻止 SARS-CoV-2 病毒的传播仍有待检验。

方法

我们构建了首个难民难民营 COVID-19 暴发的空间显式基于主体模型,并应用该模型评估可行的非药物干预措施。我们使用 COVID-19 传播率和进展动态的已发表数据以及来自欧洲最大的难民营,希腊莱斯博斯岛的莫里亚难民营的人口和空间数据对模型进行了参数化。我们模拟了有无四种可行干预措施的 COVID-19 疫情。

结果

营地的空间细分(分区)能够“使曲线变平”,将感染高峰减少多达 70%,并将感染高峰推迟几个月。使用口罩并结合对感染者的有效隔离可降低总体感染率,有时甚至完全避免疫情暴发。这些干预措施必须迅速实施,才能最大程度地发挥作用。封锁对 COVID-19 动态的影响很小。

结论

基于主体的模型是预测空间结构和异质人群中疾病传播的有力工具。我们的研究结果表明,可行的干预措施可以减缓难民营中 COVID-19 的传播,并为营地管理人员制定干预策略提供证据基础。我们的模型可以进行修改,以研究其他面临 COVID-19 或未来疫情风险的封闭人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a59/7733233/df93a841b2c5/bmjgh-2020-003727f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a59/7733233/89800fafcd3d/bmjgh-2020-003727f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a59/7733233/df93a841b2c5/bmjgh-2020-003727f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a59/7733233/89800fafcd3d/bmjgh-2020-003727f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a59/7733233/df93a841b2c5/bmjgh-2020-003727f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Modelling interventions to control COVID-19 outbreaks in a refugee camp.在难民营中控制 COVID-19 疫情的干预措施建模。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Dec;5(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003727.
2
[Reducing the impact of COVID-19 in immigrants: a systematic review of the efficacy of interventions].[减轻新冠疫情对移民的影响:干预措施效果的系统评价]
Epidemiol Prev. 2024 Jul-Oct;48(4-5):75-84. doi: 10.19191/EP24.4-5.S1.116.
3
Mental health consequences of long-term stays in refugee camps: preliminary evidence from Moria.难民营中长期滞留的心理后果:来自莫里亚的初步证据。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 2;21(1):1290. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11301-x.
4
Lessons to learn from the analysis of routine health data from Moria Refugee Camp on Lesvos, Greece.从希腊莱斯沃斯岛莫里亚难民营的常规健康数据分析中吸取教训。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Jun 14;45(2):347-355. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdac127.
5
Seasonal patterns of communicable disease incidence and antibiotic prescribing in Moria refugee camp, Greece.希腊莫里亚难民营传染病发病率和抗生素处方的季节性模式。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2024 Feb 23;46(1):41-50. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad212.
6
Comparing alternative cholera vaccination strategies in Maela refugee camp: using a transmission model in public health practice.比较 Maela 难民营中替代霍乱疫苗接种策略:在公共卫生实践中使用传播模型。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Dec 21;19(1):1075. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4688-6.
7
Multicomponent Strategies to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Transmission - Nine Overnight Youth Summer Camps, United States, June-August 2021.多组分策略预防 SARS-CoV-2 传播——2021 年 6 月至 8 月,美国九个青少年夏令营。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Oct 8;70(40):1420-1424. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7040e1.
8
Chickenpox Outbreaks in Three Refugee Camps on Mainland Greece, 2016-2017: A Retrospective Study.2016 - 2017年希腊大陆三个难民营中的水痘疫情:一项回顾性研究
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2024 Feb;39(1):3-12. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X23006702. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
9
COVID-19 and refugee camps.新冠疫情与难民营。
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2021 Jul-Aug;42:102083. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2021.102083. Epub 2021 May 12.
10
Operational response simulation tool for epidemics within refugee and IDP settlements: A scenario-based case study of the Cox's Bazar settlement.难民和境内流离失所者定居点内传染病应急响应模拟工具:以考克斯巴扎定居点为例的基于情景的案例研究。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Oct 28;17(10):e1009360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009360. eCollection 2021 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
COVID-19 prevention and control effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions-fuzzy-sets qualitative comparative analysis based on 69 countries in the world.基于全球 69 个国家的非药物干预 COVID-19 防控效果的模糊集定性比较分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 26;12:1419109. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1419109. eCollection 2024.
2
"We want our freedom back, that's our only need": a qualitative study of health and social needs among asylum seekers and undocumented migrants crossing the borders from Belarus to Lithuania.“我们想要回我们的自由,这是我们唯一的需求”:一项关于从白俄罗斯越境到立陶宛的寻求庇护者和无证移民的健康和社会需求的定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 2;12:1371119. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1371119. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Correlation between early features and prognosis of symptomatic COVID-19 discharged patients in Hunan, China.湖南出院有症状的 COVID-19 患者的早期特征与预后的相关性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 22;11(1):4304. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83654-7.
2
Modelling transmission and control of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia.模拟澳大利亚 COVID-19 大流行的传播和控制。
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 11;11(1):5710. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19393-6.
3
Estimating the overdispersion in COVID-19 transmission using outbreak sizes outside China.利用中国境外的疫情规模估算新冠病毒传播中的过度离散情况。
COVID-19 & informal settlements: is 'Stay Home' safe?新冠疫情与非正式住区:“居家”安全吗?
UCL Open Environ. 2022 Jul 29;4:e038. doi: 10.14324/111.444/ucloe.000038. eCollection 2022.
4
Health and well-being of refugees, asylum seekers, undocumented migrants, and internally displaced persons under COVID-19: a scoping review.COVID-19 下难民、寻求庇护者、无证移民和国内流离失所者的健康和福祉:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 26;11:1145002. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1145002. eCollection 2023.
5
Persistence of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 in Australia: The impact of fluctuating social distancing.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)奥密克戎变种在澳大利亚的持续存在:社交距离波动的影响。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Apr 17;3(4):e0001427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001427. eCollection 2023.
6
Covid-19 case management in a Greek migrant camp: The Hellenic Red Cross Mobile Health Unit intervention in Nea Malakasa temporary accommodation center.希腊难民营中的新冠疫情病例管理:希腊红十字会流动医疗队在新马拉卡萨临时安置中心的干预措施。
J Migr Health. 2023;7:100184. doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2023.100184. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
7
A scoping review of the impacts of COVID-19 physical distancing measures on vulnerable population groups.COVID-19 物理距离措施对弱势群体影响的范围综述。
Nat Commun. 2023 Feb 3;14(1):599. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36267-9.
8
Enhancing Respiratory Disease Surveillance to Detect COVID-19 in Shelters for Displaced Persons, Thailand-Myanmar Border, 2020-2021.强化呼吸道疾病监测以发现 2020-2021 年泰国-缅甸边境流离失所者收容所中的 COVID-19
Emerg Infect Dis. 2022 Dec;28(13):S17-S25. doi: 10.3201/eid2813.220324.
9
Conflict, community, and COVID-19: response and implications in Ethiopia.冲突、社区与新冠疫情:埃塞俄比亚的应对措施及影响
J Public Health Afr. 2022 Sep 21;13(3):1957. doi: 10.4081/jphia.2022.1957. eCollection 2022 Sep 7.
10
COVID-19 epidemiology and changes in health service utilization in Uganda's refugee settlements during the first year of the pandemic.COVID-19 流行病学和大流行第一年乌干达难民营卫生服务利用的变化。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 17;22(1):1927. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14305-3.
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Jul 10;5:67. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15842.3. eCollection 2020.
4
Spread and Impact of COVID-19 in China: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Predictions From Transmission-Dynamic Models.新型冠状病毒肺炎在中国的传播与影响:基于传播动力学模型预测的系统评价与综合分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Jun 18;7:321. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00321. eCollection 2020.
5
A Cluster of Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infections Indicating Person-to-Person Transmission Among Casual Contacts From Social Gatherings: An Outbreak Case-Contact Investigation.一起新型冠状病毒肺炎聚集性感染事件提示社交聚会中密切接触者之间存在人传人现象:一起暴发疫情的病例-接触者调查
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 12;7(6):ofaa231. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa231. eCollection 2020 Jun.
6
Rohingya refugees at high risk of COVID-19 in Bangladesh.孟加拉国的罗兴亚难民面临感染新冠病毒的高风险。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Aug;8(8):e993-e994. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30282-5. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
7
The potential impact of COVID-19 in refugee camps in Bangladesh and beyond:  A modeling study.《COVID-19 对孟加拉国难民营及其他地区的潜在影响:一项建模研究》
PLoS Med. 2020 Jun 16;17(6):e1003144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003144. eCollection 2020 Jun.
8
Community Use Of Face Masks And COVID-19: Evidence From A Natural Experiment Of State Mandates In The US.社区使用口罩与 COVID-19:来自美国州政府强制令的自然实验证据。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Aug;39(8):1419-1425. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00818. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
9
COVID-19 and Postinfection Immunity: Limited Evidence, Many Remaining Questions.新冠病毒感染与感染后免疫:证据有限,仍有诸多问题
JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2245-2246. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7869.
10
COVID-19: How do you self-isolate in a refugee camp?新冠疫情:在难民营中如何进行自我隔离?
Int J Public Health. 2020 Jun;65(5):515-517. doi: 10.1007/s00038-020-01381-8. Epub 2020 May 8.