• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度北方邦以人为中心的孕产妇保健质量改善干预的结果。

Results of a person-centered maternal health quality improvement intervention in Uttar Pradesh, India.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.

School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 11;15(12):e0242909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242909. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0242909
PMID:33306689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7732121/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Poor patient experiences during delivery in Uttar Pradesh, India is a common problem. It delays presentation at facilities after the onset of labor and contributes to poor maternal health outcomes. Patient-centered maternity care (PCMC) is recognized by the World Health Organization as critical to overall quality. Changing PCMC requires changing the process of care, and is therefore especially challenging.

METHODS

We used a matched case-control design to evaluate a quality improvement process directed at PCMC and based on widely established team-based methods used in many OECD countries. The intervention was introduced into three government facilities and teams supported to brainstorm and test improvements over 12 months. Progress was measured through pre-post interviews with new mothers, scored using a validated PCMC scale. Analysis included chi-squared and difference-in-difference tests.

FINDINGS

On a scale to 100, the PCMC score of the intervention group increased 22.9 points compared to controls. Deliveries attended by midwives, dais, ASHAs or non-skilled providers resulted in significantly higher PCMC scores than those attended to by nurses or doctors. The intervention was associated with one additional visit from a doctor and over two additional visits from nurses per day, compared to the control group.

INTERPRETATION

This study has demonstrated the effectiveness of a team-based quality improvement intervention to ameliorate women's childbirth experiences. These improvements were locally designed and led, and offer a model for potential replication.

摘要

背景

印度北方邦分娩期间患者体验较差是一个普遍问题。这会导致产妇在分娩开始后延迟到医疗机构就诊,并导致产妇健康状况不佳。以患者为中心的产妇保健(PCMC)被世界卫生组织认为是整体质量的关键。改变 PCMC 需要改变护理流程,因此尤其具有挑战性。

方法

我们使用了匹配病例对照设计来评估一项针对 PCMC 的质量改进过程,该过程基于在许多经合组织国家广泛使用的基于团队的既定方法。该干预措施被引入到三个政府机构中,并支持团队在 12 个月内集思广益并测试改进措施。通过对新妈妈进行预-后访谈,使用经过验证的 PCMC 量表进行评分来衡量进展。分析包括卡方检验和差异检验。

结果

在 100 分的 PCMC 评分中,干预组的评分比对照组高 22.9 分。与由护士或医生接生的分娩相比,由助产士、接生婆、ASHAs 或非熟练提供者接生的分娩的 PCMC 评分显著更高。与对照组相比,干预组每天额外增加了一次医生就诊和两次以上的护士就诊。

结论

本研究证明了基于团队的质量改进干预措施可以改善女性的分娩体验,这种改善是在当地设计和领导的,并为潜在的复制提供了一种模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f08/7732121/286ab7f17dc3/pone.0242909.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f08/7732121/286ab7f17dc3/pone.0242909.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f08/7732121/286ab7f17dc3/pone.0242909.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Results of a person-centered maternal health quality improvement intervention in Uttar Pradesh, India.印度北方邦以人为中心的孕产妇保健质量改善干预的结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 11;15(12):e0242909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242909. eCollection 2020.
2
A comparison of intensive vs. light-touch quality improvement interventions for maternal health in Uttar Pradesh, India.印度北方邦针对孕产妇健康的强化与轻触式质量改进干预措施的比较
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec 4;20(1):1121. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05960-6.
3
Can changes to improve person-centred maternity care be spread across public health facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India?改善以患者为中心的产护服务的措施能否在印度北方邦的公立卫生机构中推广?
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021 Dec;29(1):1-15. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2021.1892570.
4
Validation of the person-centered maternity care scale in India.印度以人为本的母婴护理量表的验证。
Reprod Health. 2018 Aug 29;15(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0591-7.
5
Person-centred maternity care in low-income and middle-income countries: analysis of data from Kenya, Ghana, and India.中低收入国家的以人为主的孕产护理:来自肯尼亚、加纳和印度的数据分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jan;7(1):e96-e109. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30403-0.
6
Can a quality improvement intervention improve person-centred maternity care in Kenya?质量改进干预能否改善肯尼亚以患者为中心的产时护理?
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2175448. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2175448.
7
Do women's perspectives of quality of care during childbirth match with those of providers? A qualitative study in Uttar Pradesh, India.分娩期间女性对护理质量的看法与医护人员的看法相符吗?印度北方邦的一项定性研究。
Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1527971. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2018.1527971.
8
Is quality of care during childbirth consistent from admission to discharge? A qualitative study of delivery care in Uttar Pradesh, India.分娩期间的护理质量从入院到出院是否一致?印度北方邦分娩护理的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 27;13(9):e0204607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204607. eCollection 2018.
9
A cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of the 'Caring for Providers to Improve Patient Experience' (CPIPE) intervention in Kenya and Ghana: study protocol.一项在肯尼亚和加纳评估“关爱提供者以改善患者体验”(CPIPE)干预措施影响的整群随机对照试验:研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):2509. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20023-9.
10
Correlation among experience of person-centered maternity care, provision of care and women's satisfaction: Cross sectional study in Colombo, Sri Lanka.以产妇为中心的照护体验、照护提供与妇女满意度之间的关联:斯里兰卡科伦坡的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0249265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249265. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving respectful maternity care through group antenatal care: Findings from a cluster randomized controlled trial.通过小组产前护理改善尊重孕产妇的护理:一项整群随机对照试验的结果
Midwifery. 2025 Aug;147:104457. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2025.104457. Epub 2025 May 10.
2
Assessment of the person-centered maternity care scale: a global systematic review.以产妇为中心的护理量表评估:一项全球系统评价
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Mar 20;82:103145. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103145. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Improving complex health systems and lived environments for maternal and perinatal well-being in urban sub-Saharan Africa: the UrbanBirth Collective.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between person-centered maternity care and newborn complications in Kenya.以产妇为中心的产时护理与肯尼亚新生儿并发症的关联。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Jan;148(1):27-34. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12978. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
2
Patient-experience during delivery in public health facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India.印度北方邦公立卫生机构的分娩体验。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Oct 1;34(8):574-581. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz067.
3
An investigation into mistreatment of women during labour and childbirth in maternity care facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India: a mixed methods study.
改善撒哈拉以南非洲城市地区孕产妇和围产期健康的复杂卫生系统及生活环境:城市生育协作组织
J Glob Health. 2025 Jan 23;15:03009. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.03009.
4
Integrating support persons into maternity care and associations with quality of care: a postpartum survey of mothers and support persons in Kenya.将支持人员纳入产时保健并与护理质量相关联:肯尼亚母婴产后调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jun 13;24(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06611-y.
5
Changes in health facility readiness for obstetric and neonatal care services in Nepal: an analysis of cross-sectional health facility survey data in 2015 and 2021.尼泊尔产科和新生儿保健服务机构准备情况的变化:2015 年和 2021 年横断面卫生机构调查数据的分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jan 24;24(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06138-8.
6
Person-centered maternity care during childbirth and associated factors among mothers who gave birth at public health institutions of Debre Markos town, Northwest Ethiopia, 2022: A cross-sectional study.2022年埃塞俄比亚西北部德布雷马科斯镇公共卫生机构分娩期间以产妇为中心的护理及相关因素:一项横断面研究
SAGE Open Med. 2024 Jan 18;12:20503121231225352. doi: 10.1177/20503121231225352. eCollection 2024.
7
Improving respectful maternity care through group antenatal care: findings from a cluster randomized controlled trial.通过小组产前护理改善孕产妇尊严护理:一项整群随机对照试验的结果
Res Sq. 2023 Dec 18:rs.3.rs-3682833. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3682833/v1.
8
The roles of multi-component interventions in reducing mistreatment of women and enhancing respectful maternity care: a systematic review.多组分干预在减少对妇女的虐待和加强尊重产妇护理方面的作用:系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 1;23(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05640-3.
9
Can changes to improve person-centred maternity care be spread across public health facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India?改善以患者为中心的产护服务的措施能否在印度北方邦的公立卫生机构中推广?
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021 Dec;29(1):1-15. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2021.1892570.
印度北方邦产妇保健机构中分娩和生育期间虐待妇女的调查:混合方法研究。
Reprod Health. 2019 Jan 23;16(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0668-y.
4
Validation of the person-centered maternity care scale in India.印度以人为本的母婴护理量表的验证。
Reprod Health. 2018 Aug 29;15(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0591-7.
5
Predictors of person-centered maternity care: the role of socioeconomic status, empowerment, and facility type.以产妇为中心的护理的预测因素:社会经济地位、赋权及机构类型的作用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 11;18(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3183-x.
6
Outcomes of a Coaching-Based WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist Program in India.印度一项基于指导的世界卫生组织安全分娩检查表项目的成果。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 14;377(24):2313-2324. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1701075.
7
Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A systematic review.质量改进合作是否有效?系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Mar;27(3):226-240. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006926. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
8
Development of a tool to measure person-centered maternity care in developing settings: validation in a rural and urban Kenyan population.开发一种工具来衡量发展中环境下以人为主的孕产护理:在肯尼亚城乡人群中的验证。
Reprod Health. 2017 Sep 22;14(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0381-7.
9
Associations Between Mistreatment by a Provider during Childbirth and Maternal Health Complications in Uttar Pradesh, India.印度北方邦分娩期间医护人员虐待行为与孕产妇健康并发症之间的关联
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Sep;21(9):1821-1833. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2298-8.
10
Quality of routine essential care during childbirth: clinical observations of uncomplicated births in Uttar Pradesh, India.分娩期间常规基本护理质量:印度北方邦正常分娩的临床观察
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Jun 1;95(6):419-429. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.179291. Epub 2017 Apr 24.