Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiology, 65526Asan Medical Center, 37994University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2021 Aug;27(4):558-565. doi: 10.1177/1591019920980876. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
We have used a contrast injection scheme termed as "guided catheterization method (guided method)." By using a large-bore 5-Fr catheter and 0.032-in guidewire, a contrast medium could be injected without removing the guidewire. Using a neurovascular phantom, we studied the influence of leaving the guidewire on the contrast injection pressure. Image quality was compared with that obtained using a 4-Fr regular angiography catheter (conventional method).
Actual contrast injection pressure, flow rate, flow volume, and several variables from the time-density curve (TDC) were obtained using the guided method and the conventional method. Catheterization parameters included flow rate, the viscosity of a contrast medium (CM), and catheter length. The pressure limit of a contrast injector was set as 1200 psi. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images on the neurovascular phantom were acquired. The DSA images were processed, and TDC on a specific region of interest was obtained. Variables from TDC were calculated and compared between the different catheters.
The ranges of actual contrast injection pressure with the conventional and the guided method were 138-299 psi and 184-451 psi, respectively. A minimal reduction of the actual flow rate was found under some conditions with the guided method. Comparable opacifications in DSA images were achieved in all conditions. Although peak intensity was different by flow rate or CM, all TDC variables did not differ based on the catheter. There were no significant harmful events during the 90 experiments.
With adjustment of the pressure limit, cerebral angiography using the 5-Fr, large-bore catheter without removal of the guidewire is feasible, safe, and expected to provide image quality comparable to that of the 4-Fr regular catheter.
我们使用了一种称为“引导导管法(引导法)”的对比剂注射方案。通过使用大口径 5Fr 导管和 0.032in 导丝,可以在不移除导丝的情况下注入对比剂。我们使用神经血管模型研究了留置导丝对对比剂注射压力的影响。通过比较图像质量,来评估使用大口径 5Fr 导管和 0.032in 导丝的引导法与使用 4Fr 常规血管造影导管(常规方法)的效果。
使用引导法和常规方法获得实际对比剂注射压力、流速、流量和时间密度曲线(TDC)的几个变量。导管参数包括流速、对比剂(CM)的粘度和导管长度。将造影剂注射器的压力限制设置为 1200psi。在神经血管模型上进行数字减影血管造影(DSA)图像采集。处理 DSA 图像,并获得特定感兴趣区域的 TDC。计算 TDC 的变量,并比较不同导管之间的差异。
常规方法和引导法的实际对比剂注射压力范围分别为 138-299psi 和 184-451psi。在某些条件下,使用引导法时实际流速会略有降低。在所有条件下,DSA 图像的对比度都可以达到相同的程度。尽管峰值强度会因流速或 CM 而异,但所有 TDC 变量都不会因导管而不同。在 90 次实验中没有发生任何严重的不良事件。
通过调整压力限制,使用 5Fr 大口径导管而不移除导丝进行脑血管造影是可行的、安全的,预计可以提供与 4Fr 常规导管相当的图像质量。