Department of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Research/ASCoR, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ethn Health. 2022 Jul;27(5):1123-1146. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2020.1857338. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
To gain insight into (1) the unfulfilled instrumental and affective needs of Turkish-Dutch and Moroccan-Dutch older cancer patients/survivors, (2) the barriers perceived by healthcare professionals in fulfilling these needs, and (3) how the , a multilingual eHealth tool, can support the fulfillment of patients'/survivors' needs, and decrease professionals' barriers.
We conducted a pre-implementation study of the using semi-structured interviews with Turkish-Dutch ( = 10; mean age = 69.10) and Moroccan-Dutch ( = 9; mean age = 69.33) older cancer patients/survivors, and held two focus groups with general practitioners (GPs; = 7; mean age 45.14) and oncology nurses (ONs; = 5; mean age = 49.60). Topic list consisted of questions related to needs and perceived barriers. Analysis was based on grounded theory. The acceptance of the was inquired by questions based on the concepts of the Technology Acceptance Model, and analyzed deductively.
Patients/survivors reported unfulfilled needs concerning: (1) information about cancer (treatment), (2) information about the healthcare system, (3) possibilities regarding psychosocial support, and (4) doctor-patient relationship. Among professionals, the main perceived barriers were: (1) patients'/survivors' low health literacy and language barrier, (2) cultural taboo, (3) lack of insight into patients' instrumental needs, and (4) patients'/survivors' lack of trust in Dutch healthcare. Both patients/survivors and professionals thought that implementing the could be effective in fulfilling most of the needs and decreasing the barriers. However, a majority of the patients/survivors were hesitant regarding the use of it, because they found it too difficult to use. Professionals showed a positive intention towards using the .
To enhance patient participation among older migrant cancer patients/survivors, the is, under certain conditions, a promising tool for fulfilling patients'/survivors' unfulfilled instrumental and affective needs and for bridging barriers perceived by professionals.
深入了解(1)土耳其-荷兰和摩洛哥-荷兰老年癌症患者/幸存者未满足的工具性和情感需求,(2)医疗保健专业人员在满足这些需求方面感知到的障碍,以及(3)多语言电子健康工具 如何支持患者/幸存者需求的满足,并减少专业人员的障碍。
我们使用半结构化访谈对土耳其-荷兰( = 10;平均年龄 = 69.10)和摩洛哥-荷兰( = 9;平均年龄 = 69.33)老年癌症患者/幸存者进行了实施前研究,并与全科医生(GPs; = 7;平均年龄 45.14)和肿瘤护士(ONs; = 5;平均年龄 = 49.60)进行了两次焦点小组讨论。主题列表包括与需求和感知障碍相关的问题。分析基于扎根理论。通过基于技术接受模型概念的问题来探究对 的接受程度,并进行演绎分析。
患者/幸存者报告未满足以下需求:(1)有关癌症(治疗)的信息,(2)有关医疗保健系统的信息,(3)有关心理社会支持的可能性,以及(4)医患关系。在专业人员中,主要感知到的障碍包括:(1)患者/幸存者的健康素养低和语言障碍,(2)文化禁忌,(3)缺乏对患者工具性需求的了解,以及(4)患者/幸存者对荷兰医疗保健的信任缺失。患者/幸存者和专业人员都认为实施 可以有效地满足大多数需求并减少障碍。然而,大多数患者/幸存者对使用它犹豫不决,因为他们认为使用起来太难了。专业人员对使用 表现出积极的意愿。
为了增强老年移民癌症患者/幸存者的参与度,在某些条件下, 是一种有前途的工具,可以满足患者/幸存者未满足的工具性和情感需求,并弥合专业人员感知到的障碍。