Jansen Ellen Elisabeth, Meyer-Lueckel Hendrik, Esteves-Oliveira Marcella, Wierichs Richard Johannes
Clinic for Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Department of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jun;25(6):4011-4021. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03732-4. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different bleaching gels on the masking and caries-arresting effects of infiltrated and non-infiltrated stained artificial enamel caries lesions.
Bovine enamel specimens (n = 240) with each two sound areas (SI and SC) and each two lesions (DI and DC) were infiltrated (DI and SI), stained (1:1 red wine-coffee mixture,70 days), and randomly distributed in six groups to be bleached with the following materials: 6%HP (HP-6), 16%CP (CP-16), 35%HP (HP-35), 40%HP (HP-40), and no bleaching (NBl,NBl-NBr). Subsequently, specimens were pH-cycled (28 days, 6 × 60 min demineralization/day) and all groups except NBl-NBr were brushed with toothpaste slurry (1.100 ppm, 2×/day, 10 s). Differences in colorimetric values (ΔL, ΔE) and integrated mineral loss (ΔΔZ) between baseline, infiltration, staining, bleaching, and pH cycling were calculated using photographic and transversal microradiographic images.
At baseline, significant visible color differences between DI and SC were observed (ΔE = 12.2; p < 0.001; ANCOVA). After infiltration, these differences decreased significantly (ΔE = 3.8; p < 0.001). Staining decreased and bleaching increased ΔL values significantly (p ≤ 0.001). No significant difference in ΔΔE was observed between before staining and after bleaching (ΔE = 4.3; p = 0.308) and between the bleaching agents (p = 1.000; ANCOVA). pH-cycling did not affect colorimetric values (ΔE = 4.0; p = 1.000). For DI, no significant change in ΔZ during in vitro period was observed (p ≥ 0.063; paired t test).
Under the conditions chosen, the tested materials could satisfactorily bleach infiltrated and non-infiltrated stained enamel. Furthermore, bleaching did not affect the caries-arresting effect of the infiltration.
The present study indicates that bleaching is a viable way to satisfactorily recover the appearance of discolored sound enamel and infiltrated lesions.
本研究旨在评估不同漂白凝胶对渗透和未渗透的人工染色釉质龋损的遮盖和防龋效果的影响。
选取牛牙釉质标本(n = 240),每个标本有两个健康区域(SI和SC)和两个龋损区域(DI和DC),对龋损区域进行渗透(DI和SI),用1:1的红酒-咖啡混合物染色70天,然后随机分为六组,分别用以下材料进行漂白:6%过氧化氢(HP-6)、16%过氧化脲(CP-16)、35%过氧化氢(HP-35)、40%过氧化氢(HP-40),不进行漂白(NBl,NBl-NBr)。随后,对标本进行pH循环处理(28天,每天6次脱矿,每次60分钟),除NBl-NBr组外,其他组用牙膏糊剂(1.100 ppm,每天2次,每次10秒)刷牙。使用摄影和横向显微放射图像计算基线、渗透、染色、漂白和pH循环前后的比色值(ΔL、ΔE)和累计矿物质损失(ΔΔZ)的差异。
在基线时,DI和SC之间观察到明显的可见颜色差异(ΔE = 12.2;p < 0.001;协方差分析)。渗透后,这些差异显著降低(ΔE = 3.8;p < 0.00)。染色使ΔL值显著降低,漂白使ΔL值显著增加(p ≤ 0.)。在染色前和漂白后之间以及漂白剂之间未观察到ΔΔE的显著差异(ΔE = 4.3;p = 0.308)(p = 1.000;协方差分析)。pH循环对比色值没有影响(ΔE = = 1.000)。对于DI,在体外实验期间未观察到ΔZ的显著变化(p ≥ 0.063;配对t检验)。
在所选条件下,测试材料能够令人满意地漂白渗透和未渗透的染色牙釉质。此外,漂白不影响渗透的防龋效果。
本研究表明,漂白是一种令人满意地恢复变色健康牙釉质和渗透龋损外观的可行方法。