Suppr超能文献

“礼物”的义务:精准医学中的互惠与责任。

Obligations of the "Gift": Reciprocity and Responsibility in Precision Medicine.

机构信息

Columbia University.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2021 Apr;21(4):57-66. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1851813. Epub 2020 Dec 16.

Abstract

Precision medicine relies on data and biospecimens from participants who willingly offer their personal information on the promise that this act will ultimately result in knowledge that will improve human health. Drawing on anthropological framings of the "gift," this paper contextualizes participation in precision medicine as inextricable from social relationships and their ongoing ethical obligations. Going beyond altruism, reframing biospecimen and data collection in terms of socially regulated gift-giving recovers questions of responsibility and care. As opposed to conceiving participation in terms of donations that elide clinical labor critical to precision medicine, the gift metaphor underscores ethical commitments to reciprocity and responsibility. This demands confronting inequities in precision medicine, such as systemic bias and lack of affordability and access. A focus on justice in precision medicine that recognizes the sociality of the gift is a critical frontier for bioethics.

摘要

精准医学依赖于参与者自愿提供个人信息的数据和生物样本,他们承诺这一行为最终将产生改善人类健康的知识。本文借鉴人类学对“礼物”的框架,将参与精准医学的情况置于社会关系及其持续的道德义务中,使其不可分割。超越利他主义,将生物样本和数据收集重新定义为受社会规范约束的礼物馈赠,这就涉及到责任和关怀的问题。与将参与精准医学的行为理解为捐赠行为不同,这种行为模糊了对精准医学至关重要的临床劳动,而礼物隐喻则强调了互惠和责任的道德承诺。这就需要正视精准医学中的不平等问题,如系统偏见、可负担性和可及性的缺乏。承认礼物的社会性是精准医学中正义问题的一个关键前沿,也是生物伦理学的一个关键前沿。

相似文献

1
Obligations of the "Gift": Reciprocity and Responsibility in Precision Medicine.
Am J Bioeth. 2021 Apr;21(4):57-66. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1851813. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
2
3
Heroic measures. Just bioethics in an unjust world.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2001 Nov-Dec;31(6):34-40.
6
Response to Erich Loewy: commentary.
J Clin Ethics. 1991 Summer;2(2):90-1.
7
Solving ethical dilemmas in nursing practice.
Top Clin Nurs. 1982 Apr;4(2):15-21.
8
Reciprocity-based reasons for benefiting research participants: most fail, the most plausible is problematic.
Bioethics. 2014 Nov;28(9):456-71. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12039. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
9
Understanding suffering.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1992 Sep-Oct;22(5):43-4.
10
Principlism and its alleged competitors.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1995 Sep;5(3):181-98. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0111.

引用本文的文献

2
Survey of attitudes in a Danish public towards reuse of health data.
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 26;19(12):e0312558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312558. eCollection 2024.
3
A Just Genomics Needs an ELSI of Translation.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2024 Dec;54 Suppl 2:S126-S135. doi: 10.1002/hast.4938.
4
Supporting Stewardship: Funding, Utilization, and Sustainability as Ethical Concerns in Networked Biobanking.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2025 Jan-Mar;16(1):42-51. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2024.2399533. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
5
Willingness to participate in a personalized health cohort - insights from the swiss health study pilot phase.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 7;24(1):2140. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19650-z.
6
Blurred Boundaries: Toward an Expanded Ethics of Research and Clinical Care.
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Aug;23(8):5-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2224148. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
7
Interrogating the Value of Return of Results for Diverse Populations: Perspectives from Precision Medicine Researchers.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2024 Apr-Jun;15(2):108-119. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2279965. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
8
Between data providers and concerned citizens: Exploring participation in precision public health in Switzerland.
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Jan;33(1):105-120. doi: 10.1177/09636625231183265. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
9
Innovating for a Just and Equitable Future in Genomic and Precision Medicine Research.
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Jul;23(7):1-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2215201.
10
Who tweets what about personalised medicine? Promises and concerns from Twitter discussions in Denmark.
Digit Health. 2023 Apr 20;9:20552076231169832. doi: 10.1177/20552076231169832. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Spinal muscular atrophy - the dawning of a new era.
Nat Rev Neurol. 2020 Nov;16(11):593-594. doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-00410-7.
2
Structural Racism, Social Risk Factors, and Covid-19 - A Dangerous Convergence for Black Americans.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 17;383(12):e77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2023616. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
3
Why and How Bioethics Must Turn toward Justice: A Modest Proposal.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 May;50 Suppl 1:S70-S76. doi: 10.1002/hast.1158.
4
The Disproportionate Impact of COVID-19 on Racial and Ethnic Minorities in the United States.
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Feb 16;72(4):703-706. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa815.
5
COVID-19 and African Americans.
JAMA. 2020 May 19;323(19):1891-1892. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6548.
6
The "Ought-Is" Problem: An Implementation Science Framework for Translating Ethical Norms Into Practice.
Am J Bioeth. 2020 May;20(4):62-70. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1730483.
7
Spinal Muscular Atrophy in the Black South African Population: A Matter of Rearrangement?
Front Genet. 2020 Feb 13;11:54. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00054. eCollection 2020.
8
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations.
Science. 2019 Oct 25;366(6464):447-453. doi: 10.1126/science.aax2342.
9
Ethics of inclusion: Cultivate trust in precision medicine.
Science. 2019 Jun 7;364(6444):941-942. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw8299.
10
"I don't want to be Henrietta Lacks": diverse patient perspectives on donating biospecimens for precision medicine research.
Genet Med. 2019 Jan;21(1):107-113. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0032-6. Epub 2018 Jun 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验