Washington University School of Medicine.
Am J Bioeth. 2020 May;20(4):62-70. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1730483.
We argue that once a normative claim is developed, there is an imperative to effect changes based on this norm. As such, ethicists should adopt an "implementation mindset" when formulating norms, and collaborate with others who have the expertise needed to implement policies and practices. To guide this translation of norms into practice, we propose a framework that incorporates implementation science into ethics. Implementation science is a discipline dedicated to supporting the sustained enactment of interventions. We further argue that implementation principles should be integrated into the development of specific normative claims as well as the enactment of these norms. Ethicists formulating a specific norm should consider whether that norm can feasibly be enacted because the resultant specific norm will directly affect the types of interventions subsequently developed. To inform this argument, we will describe the fundamental principles of implementation science, using informed consent to research participation as an illustration.
我们认为,一旦提出了规范性主张,就必须根据这一规范来推动变革。因此,伦理学家在制定规范时应该采用“实施思维”,并与具有实施政策和实践所需专业知识的其他人合作。为了指导规范向实践的转化,我们提出了一个将实施科学纳入伦理学的框架。实施科学是一门致力于支持干预措施持续实施的学科。我们进一步认为,实施原则应该纳入具体规范主张的制定和这些规范的实施中。制定具体规范的伦理学家应该考虑该规范是否可以实际实施,因为由此产生的具体规范将直接影响随后开发的干预类型。为了说明这一点,我们将使用知情同意参与研究来说明实施科学的基本原则。