Suppr超能文献

2018 年,10 种主流营养相关期刊中的同行评审研究文章中食品行业的参与特点和程度。

The characteristics and extent of food industry involvement in peer-reviewed research articles from 10 leading nutrition-related journals in 2018.

机构信息

Global Obesity Centre (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

School of Public Health, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 16;15(12):e0243144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243144. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is emerging evidence that food industry involvement in nutrition research may bias research findings and/or research agendas. However, the extent of food industry involvement in nutrition research has not been systematically explored. This study aimed to identify the extent of food industry involvement in peer-reviewed articles from a sample of leading nutrition-related journals, and to examine the extent to which findings from research involving the food industry support industry interests.

METHODS

All original research articles published in 2018 in the top 10 most-cited nutrition- and dietetics-related journals were analysed. We evaluated the proportion of articles that disclosed involvement from the food industry, including through author affiliations, funding sources, declarations of interest or other acknowledgments. Principal research findings from articles with food industry involvement, and a random sample of articles without food industry involvement, were categorised according to the extent to which they supported relevant food industry interests.

RESULTS

196/1,461 (13.4%) articles reported food industry involvement. The extent of food industry involvement varied by journal, with The Journal of Nutrition (28.3%) having the highest and Paediatric Obesity (3.8%) having the lowest proportion of industry involvement. Processed food manufacturers were involved in the most articles (77/196, 39.3%). Of articles with food industry involvement, 55.6% reported findings favourable to relevant food industry interests, compared to 9.7% of articles without food industry involvement.

CONCLUSION

Food industry involvement in peer-reviewed research in leading nutrition-related journals is commonplace. In line with previous literature, this study has shown that a greater proportion of peer-reviewed studies involving the food industry have results that favour relevant food industry interests than peer-reviewed studies without food industry involvement. Given the potential competing interests of the food industry, it is important to explore mechanisms that can safeguard the integrity and public relevance of nutrition research.

摘要

简介

有新证据表明,食品行业参与营养研究可能会使研究结果和/或研究议程产生偏差。然而,食品行业在营养研究中的参与程度尚未得到系统的探索。本研究旨在确定从一组领先的营养相关期刊中抽取的样本中,食品行业在同行评议文章中的参与程度,并研究涉及食品行业的研究结果在多大程度上支持行业利益。

方法

分析了 2018 年在十大最具影响力的营养和饮食学相关期刊上发表的所有原创研究文章。我们评估了披露食品行业参与情况的文章比例,包括通过作者从属关系、资金来源、利益声明或其他致谢。根据支持相关食品行业利益的程度,对有食品行业参与的文章和无食品行业参与的随机样本的主要研究结果进行了分类。

结果

196/1461(13.4%)篇文章报告了食品行业的参与。食品行业参与的程度因期刊而异,《营养杂志》(28.3%)的参与度最高,而《儿科肥胖症》(3.8%)的参与度最低。加工食品制造商参与的文章最多(77/196,39.3%)。有食品行业参与的文章中,有 55.6%的文章报告的结果有利于相关食品行业利益,而没有食品行业参与的文章中,这一比例为 9.7%。

结论

食品行业在领先的营养相关期刊的同行评议研究中的参与是普遍存在的。与之前的文献一致,本研究表明,涉及食品行业的同行评议研究中,有更多的研究结果有利于相关食品行业利益,而没有食品行业参与的同行评议研究则较少。鉴于食品行业的潜在竞争利益,探索能够维护营养研究的完整性和公共相关性的机制非常重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12ab/7743938/6eda21396a9b/pone.0243144.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验