• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过食物来源调整蛋白质质量可能会影响营养素密度指标。

Adjusting for protein quality by food source may affect nutrient density metrics.

机构信息

Center for Public Health Nutrition, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Nutr Rev. 2021 Sep 7;79(10):1134-1144. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa117.

DOI:10.1093/nutrit/nuaa117
PMID:33331638
Abstract

Methods to assess nutrient density of foods, commonly known as nutrient profiling (NP), typically include protein as a component. In this study, the goal was to apply a correction for protein quality by food source to selected NP algorithms. Analyses of 378 component foods of the Fred Hutch food frequency questionnaire showed that animal-source foods (ie, meat, eggs, and dairy) along with some soy products and nuts were the only foods that provided > 20% of the daily value (DV) of protein per 100 g or per 100 kcal. Most beans, pulses, legumes, grains, and vegetables provided <10% DV of protein per 100 g or per 100 kcal. Adjusting for protein quality using a simplified Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS) had consequences for point-based NP models (namely, Nutri-Score) and for continuous nutrient density scores (namely, Nutrient Rich Foods). Quantitative methods that use protein content to capture nutrient density may require a protein-quality adjustment, especially when adapted for use in low- and middle-income countries where protein quality is an issue of public health concern.

摘要

方法来评估食物的营养密度,通常被称为营养成分分析(NP),通常包括蛋白质作为一个组成部分。在这项研究中,目标是通过食物来源对选定的 NP 算法进行蛋白质质量校正。对弗雷德哈钦森食物频率问卷的 378 种成分食物的分析表明,动物源食品(即肉、蛋和奶制品)以及一些豆制品和坚果是唯一每 100 克或每 100 千卡提供超过 20%的蛋白质日推荐值(DV)的食物。大多数豆类、豆类、豆类、谷物和蔬菜每 100 克或每 100 千卡提供的蛋白质<10%DV。使用简化的蛋白质消化率校正氨基酸评分(PDCAAS)进行蛋白质质量调整,对基于点的 NP 模型(即 Nutri-Score)和连续营养密度评分(即营养丰富的食物)产生了影响。使用蛋白质含量来捕捉营养密度的定量方法可能需要进行蛋白质质量调整,特别是在适应于低和中等收入国家使用时,这些国家的蛋白质质量是一个公共卫生关注的问题。

相似文献

1
Adjusting for protein quality by food source may affect nutrient density metrics.通过食物来源调整蛋白质质量可能会影响营养素密度指标。
Nutr Rev. 2021 Sep 7;79(10):1134-1144. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa117.
2
Perspective: Why Whole Grains Should Be Incorporated into Nutrient-Profile Models to Better Capture Nutrient Density.观点:为何全谷物应纳入营养素分析模型以更好地体现营养素密度
Adv Nutr. 2021 Jun 1;12(3):600-608. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa172.
3
Comparison of nutrient profiling models for assessing the nutritional quality of foods: a validation study.比较用于评估食品营养质量的营养成分分析模型:验证研究。
Br J Nutr. 2018 Sep;120(5):567-582. doi: 10.1017/S0007114518001575. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
4
Nutrient-Dense African Indigenous Vegetables and Grains in the FAO Food Composition Table for Western Africa (WAFCT) Identified Using Nutrient-Rich Food (NRF) Scores.使用富含营养的食物 (NRF) 评分在粮农组织西非食物成分表 (WAFCT) 中确定富含营养的非洲本土蔬菜和谷物。
Nutrients. 2024 Sep 4;16(17):2985. doi: 10.3390/nu16172985.
5
Nutrient density and affordability of foods in Brazil by food group and degree of processing.巴西各食物组和加工程度的食物营养密度和可负担性。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Oct;24(14):4564-4571. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020004358. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
6
The New Hybrid Nutrient Density Score NRFh 4:3:3 Tested in Relation to Affordable Nutrient Density and Healthy Eating Index 2015: Analyses of NHANES Data 2013-16.新型混合营养素密度评分 NRFh 4:3:3 与可负担营养素密度和 2015 年健康饮食指数的关系检验:NHANES 数据 2013-2016 分析。
Nutrients. 2021 May 20;13(5):1734. doi: 10.3390/nu13051734.
7
Energy and nutrient density of foods in relation to their carbon footprint.食物的能量和营养密度与其碳足迹的关系。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Jan;101(1):184-91. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.092486. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
8
The Nutrient Rich Foods Index helps to identify healthy, affordable foods.营养丰富食物指数有助于识别健康且价格实惠的食物。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Apr;91(4):1095S-1101S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.28450D. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
9
A nutrient density standard for vegetables and fruits: nutrients per calorie and nutrients per unit cost.蔬菜和水果的营养密度标准:每卡路里的营养素以及每单位成本的营养素。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2005 Dec;105(12):1881-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.09.005.
10
Uses of nutrient profiling to address public health needs: from regulation to reformulation.营养成分谱的用途:从监管到配方改革,以满足公共健康需求。
Proc Nutr Soc. 2017 Aug;76(3):220-229. doi: 10.1017/S0029665117000416. Epub 2017 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspective: Milk and Dairy Provide Affordable High-Quality Protein and Merit Inclusion in the Protein Foods Group.观点:牛奶及乳制品提供了价格实惠的优质蛋白质,理应纳入蛋白质类食物组。
Curr Dev Nutr. 2024 Dec 21;9(1):104539. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104539. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS): 10 years on.可消化必需氨基酸评分(DIAAS):十年回顾。
Front Nutr. 2024 Jul 3;11:1389719. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1389719. eCollection 2024.
3
Protein quality, nutrition and health.蛋白质质量、营养与健康。
Front Nutr. 2024 May 28;11:1406618. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1406618. eCollection 2024.
4
Common questions and misconceptions about protein supplementation: what does the scientific evidence really show?关于蛋白质补充剂的常见问题和误解:科学证据究竟显示了什么?
J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2024 Dec;21(1):2341903. doi: 10.1080/15502783.2024.2341903. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
5
Development and Validation of the Meiji Nutritional Profiling System (Meiji NPS) to Address Dietary Needs of Adults and Older Adults in Japan.开发和验证明治营养成分分析系统(Meiji NPS)以满足日本成年人和老年人的饮食需求。
Nutrients. 2024 Mar 24;16(7):936. doi: 10.3390/nu16070936.
6
A Little Bird Told Me… Nutri-Score Panoramas from a Flight over Europe, Connecting Science and Society.《小小鸟告诉我……欧洲上空的 Nutri-Score 全景图:连接科学与社会》
Nutrients. 2023 Jul 28;15(15):3367. doi: 10.3390/nu15153367.
7
Reducing meat and/or dairy consumption in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effects on protein intake, anthropometric values, and body composition.减少成年人的肉类和/或奶制品摄入量:对蛋白质摄入量、人体测量值和身体成分影响的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutr Rev. 2024 Feb 12;82(3):277-301. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuad055.
8
Most Plant-Based Milk Alternatives in the USDA Branded Food Products Database Do Not Meet Proposed Nutrient Standards or Score Well on Nutrient Density Metrics.美国农业部品牌食品数据库中的大多数植物奶替代品不符合拟议的营养标准,在营养密度指标上表现也不佳。
Nutrients. 2022 Nov 11;14(22):4767. doi: 10.3390/nu14224767.
9
Balanced Hybrid Nutrient Density Score Compared to Nutri-Score and Health Star Rating Using Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analyses.使用受试者工作特征曲线分析,将平衡混合营养密度评分与营养评分和健康星级评定进行比较。
Front Nutr. 2022 May 2;9:867096. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.867096. eCollection 2022.
10
Perspective: How to Develop Nutrient Profiling Models Intended for Global Use: A Manual.观点:如何制定面向全球使用的营养成分分析模型:手册。
Adv Nutr. 2021 Jun 1;12(3):609-620. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab018.