Institute for Environmental Planning, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Institute of Geography, Chair for Environmental Analysis and Planning in Metropolitan Regions, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Ambio. 2021 Aug;50(8):1477-1496. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01435-4. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
Planning with nature-based solutions (NBS) presents a participatory approach that harnesses actions supported by nature to address societal challenges. Whilst Geodesign may facilitate participatory planning, manage boundaries between participants, and assess impacts of NBS, empirical insights remain scarce. This paper aims to develop and test a Geodesign process for planning with NBS, and to evaluate its contributions to boundary management. In a one-day Geodesign process, eleven stakeholders delineated priority areas, changed land uses, and observed resulting impacts on ecosystem services. Contributions to boundary management were evaluated regarding translation, communication and mediation functions, as well as perceived attributions of credibility, salience, and legitimacy. Results include spatial NBS scenarios and insights into contributions to boundary management: translating scenario stories into maps differed depending on the stakeholders involved; communication can be easily facilitated; yet mediation using an indicator tool led to frustration. Geodesign can indeed facilitate NBS co-design but needs to be integrated into a larger collaborative process.
基于自然的解决方案（NBS）规划提出了一种参与式方法，利用自然支持的行动来应对社会挑战。虽然地理设计可以促进参与式规划、管理参与者之间的边界，并评估 NBS 的影响，但实证见解仍然很少。本文旨在开发和测试一种用于 NBS 规划的地理设计流程，并评估其对边界管理的贡献。在为期一天的地理设计流程中，十一位利益相关者划定了优先区域、改变了土地用途，并观察到对生态系统服务的相应影响。边界管理的贡献是基于翻译、沟通和调解功能，以及对可信度、显著性和合法性的感知归因来评估的。结果包括空间 NBS 场景和对边界管理贡献的见解：将情景故事转化为地图因涉及的利益相关者而异；沟通可以很容易地促进；但使用指标工具进行调解导致了挫败感。地理设计确实可以促进 NBS 的共同设计，但需要将其集成到更大的协作流程中。
