Krueger Joachim I
Department of Cognitive, Linguistic & Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 1;11:597706. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.597706. eCollection 2020.
The experimental research paradigm lies at the core of empirical psychology. New data analytical and computational tools continually enrich its methodological arsenal, while the paradigm's mission remains the testing of theoretical predictions and causal explanations. Predictions regarding experimental results necessarily point to the future. Once the data are collected, the causal inferences refer to a hypothesis now lying in the past. The experimental paradigm is not designed to permit strong inferences about particular incidents that occurred before predictions were made. In contrast, historical research and scholarship in other humanities focus on this backward direction of inference. The disconnect between forward-looking experimental psychology and backward-looking historical (i.e., narrative) psychology is a challenge in the postmodern era, which can be addressed. To illustrate this possibility, I discuss three historical case studies in light of theory and research in contemporary psychology.
实验研究范式是实证心理学的核心。新的数据分析和计算工具不断丰富其方法论宝库,而该范式的使命仍然是检验理论预测和因果解释。关于实验结果的预测必然指向未来。一旦收集到数据,因果推断就涉及到一个现在已成为过去的假设。实验范式并非旨在对预测做出之前发生的特定事件进行有力推断。相比之下,其他人文领域的历史研究和学术关注的是这种向后的推断方向。前瞻性的实验心理学与回顾性的历史(即叙事)心理学之间的脱节是后现代时代的一个挑战,而这一挑战是可以解决的。为了说明这种可能性,我根据当代心理学的理论和研究讨论三个历史案例研究。