McDowell Ashley, Haas Michelle, Seaworth Barbara, Wilson John W, Patrawalla Amee, Haley Connie, Lauzardo Mike, de Bruyn Miko, Goswami Neela D
Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Curry International Tuberculosis Center, Denver Metro TB Program, Denver Public Health, Oakland, CA, United States.
J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2020 Nov 16;22:100201. doi: 10.1016/j.jctube.2020.100201. eCollection 2021 Feb.
In 2019, the World Health Organization released guidelines reflecting major changes in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) management-prioritizing fluoroquinolones, bedaquiline, and linezolid (LZD) while de-emphasizing previously favored injectable agents. In some cases, linezolid use is associated with gastrointestinal intolerance, mitochondrial toxicity, and significant drug interactions. CDC's Division of Tuberculosis Elimination supports a network of regional TB Centers of Excellence, which provide medical consultation to healthcare providers. Consultations are documented in a medical consultation database (MCD) enabling evaluation of management questions and recommendations. We describe the scope of clinical inquiries and responses specific to linezolid use for MDR-TB in the US.
What are the major themes of provider and patient challenges regarding the use of linezolid for the treatment of MDR-TB in the US?
We queried MCD consults categorized as "MDR/XDR-TB" from 1/1/2013 to 12/31/2018. Only linezolid-specific consultations were included; incomplete and duplicate entries were excluded as were those citing linezolid historically or theoretically. Subgroup characteristics were assessed (e.g., Center, year, provider type). A descriptive coding scheme was developed through inductive thematic analysis.
In 2013-2018 of the 1889 consults regarding MDR/XDR-TB, 934 MDR-TB consults referenced linezolid; 137 met inclusion criteria, representing between 4 and 10% of MDR-TB consults annually. Four main themes emerged: adverse effects (71.5%); concerns about linezolid use due to co-morbidities or concurrent medication use (15.3%); dosing adjustments (8.8%); and monitoring and maintenance logistics (4.4%).
Linezolid consults consistently exceeded 4% of all consults annually over the 6-year period, suggesting a need for access to expert opinion for providers using linezolid to manage MDR-TB. While only a snapshot of MDR-TB in the US, this evaluation summarizes major provider concerns regarding particular adverse effects, and highlights a need for evidence-based guidance regarding linezolid dosing and toxicity management.
2019年,世界卫生组织发布了指南,反映了耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)管理方面的重大变化——优先使用氟喹诺酮类、贝达喹啉和利奈唑胺(LZD),同时不再强调以前常用的注射剂。在某些情况下,使用利奈唑胺会出现胃肠道不耐受、线粒体毒性以及显著的药物相互作用。美国疾病控制与预防中心结核病消除司支持一个区域结核病卓越中心网络,该网络为医疗服务提供者提供医学咨询。咨询记录在医学咨询数据库(MCD)中,以便对管理问题和建议进行评估。我们描述了美国针对耐多药结核病使用利奈唑胺的临床咨询和回复范围。
在美国,医疗服务提供者和患者在使用利奈唑胺治疗耐多药结核病方面面临的主要挑战主题有哪些?
我们查询了2013年1月1日至2018年12月31日归类为“耐多药/广泛耐药结核病”的MCD咨询。仅纳入特定于利奈唑胺的咨询;排除不完整和重复的条目,以及那些历史上或理论上引用利奈唑胺的条目。评估亚组特征(如中心、年份、医疗服务提供者类型)。通过归纳主题分析制定了描述性编码方案。
在2013 - 2018年关于耐多药/广泛耐药结核病的1889次咨询中,934次耐多药结核病咨询提到了利奈唑胺;137次符合纳入标准,占每年耐多药结核病咨询的4%至10%。出现了四个主要主题:不良反应(71.5%);因合并症或同时使用其他药物而对使用利奈唑胺的担忧(15.3%);剂量调整(8.8%);以及监测和维持安排(4.4%)。
在这6年期间,利奈唑胺咨询每年始终超过所有咨询的4%,这表明使用利奈唑胺治疗耐多药结核病的医疗服务提供者需要获得专家意见。虽然这只是美国耐多药结核病情况的一个快照,但该评估总结了医疗服务提供者对特定不良反应的主要担忧,并强调了对利奈唑胺剂量和毒性管理的循证指南的需求。