Scharffenberg Martin, Wittenstein Jakob, Herzog Moritz, Tauer Sebastian, Vivona Luigi, Theilen Raphael, Bluth Thomas, Kiss Thomas, Koch Thea, Fiorentino Giuseppe, de Abreu Marcelo Gama, Huhle Robert
Pulmonary Engineering Group, Dept. of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milano, Italia.
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2020 Dec 18;8(Suppl 1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40635-020-00315-1.
Continuous external negative pressure (CENP) during positive pressure ventilation can recruit dependent lung regions. We hypothesised that CENP applied regionally to the thorax or the abdomen only, increases the caudal end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure depending on positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in lung-injured pigs. Eight pigs were anesthetised and mechanically ventilated in the supine position. Pressure sensors were placed in the left pleural space, and a lung injury was induced by saline lung lavages. A CENP shell was placed at the abdomen and thorax (randomised order), and animals were ventilated with PEEP 15, 7 and zero cmHO (15 min each). On each PEEP level, CENP of - 40, - 30, - 20, - 10 and 0 cmHO was applied (3 min each). Respiratory and haemodynamic variables were recorded. Electrical impedance tomography allowed assessment of centre of ventilation.
Compared to positive pressure ventilation alone, the caudal transpulmonary pressure was significantly increased by CENP of ≤ 20 cmHO at all PEEP levels. CENP of - 20 cmHO reduced the mean airway pressure at zero PEEP (P = 0.025). The driving pressure decreased at CENP of ≤ 10 at PEEP of 0 and 7 cmHO (P < 0.001 each) but increased at CENP of - 30 cmHO during the highest PEEP (P = 0.001). CENP of - 30 cmHO reduced the mechanical power during zero PEEP (P < 0.001). Both elastance (P < 0.001) and resistance (P < 0.001) were decreased at CENP ≤ 30 at PEEP of 0 and 7 cmHO. Oxygenation increased at CENP of ≤ 20 at PEEP of 0 and 7 cmHO (P < 0.001 each). Applying external negative pressure significantly shifted the centre of aeration towards dorsal lung regions irrespectively of the PEEP level. Cardiac output decreased significantly at CENP -20 cmHO at all PEEP levels (P < 0.001). Effects on caudal transpulmonary pressure, elastance and cardiac output were more pronounced when CENP was applied to the abdomen compared with the thorax.
In this lung injury model in pigs, CENP increased the end-expiratory caudal transpulmonary pressure. This lead to a shift of lung aeration towards dependent zones as well as improved respiratory mechanics and oxygenation, especially when CENP was applied to the abdomen as compared to the thorax. CENP values ≤ 20 cmHO impaired the haemodynamics.
在正压通气期间持续施加外部负压(CENP)可使肺低垂区域复张。我们假设,仅对胸部或腹部局部施加CENP,可根据肺损伤猪的呼气末正压(PEEP)增加尾端呼气末跨肺压。八头猪麻醉后仰卧位进行机械通气。在左胸膜腔放置压力传感器,通过盐水肺灌洗诱导肺损伤。在腹部和胸部放置CENP外壳(随机顺序),动物分别在PEEP为15、7和0 cmH₂O的情况下通气(各通气15分钟)。在每个PEEP水平,分别施加-40、-30、-20、-10和0 cmH₂O的CENP(各持续3分钟)。记录呼吸和血流动力学变量。电阻抗断层扫描用于评估通气中心。
与单纯正压通气相比,在所有PEEP水平下,≤20 cmH₂O的CENP均显著增加尾端跨肺压。在PEEP为0时,-20 cmH₂O的CENP可降低平均气道压(P = 0.025)。在PEEP为0和7 cmH₂O时,≤10 cmH₂O的CENP可使驱动压降低(各P < 0.001),但在最高PEEP期间,-30 cmH₂O的CENP可使驱动压升高(P = 0.001)。在PEEP为0时,-30 cmH₂O的CENP可降低机械功率(P < 0.001)。在PEEP为0和7 cmH₂O时,CENP≤30 cmH₂O可使弹性阻力(P < 0.001)和黏性阻力(P < 0.001)均降低。在PEEP为0和7 cmH₂O时,≤20 cmH₂O的CENP可使氧合增加(各P < 0.001)。无论PEEP水平如何,施加外部负压均使通气中心显著向肺背侧区域偏移。在所有PEEP水平下,CENP为-20 cmH₂O时心输出量均显著降低(P < 0.001)。与胸部相比,当CENP应用于腹部时,对尾端跨肺压、弹性阻力和心输出量的影响更为明显。
在该猪肺损伤模型中,CENP增加了呼气末尾端跨肺压。这导致肺通气向低垂区域转移,并改善了呼吸力学和氧合,尤其是与胸部相比,当CENP应用于腹部时。CENP值≤20 cmH₂O会损害血流动力学。