Suppr超能文献

住院急性脑卒中老年人中改良巴氏量表和巴氏指数的验证研究及其基于 Rasch 分析的比较。

The Validation Study of Both the Modified Barthel and Barthel Index, and Their Comparison Based on Rasch Analysis in the Hospitalized Acute Stroke Elderly.

机构信息

48439 Clinical Gerontology & Geriatric Department, Medical School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Ziaeian Hospital, Tehran, Iran.

Clinical Trial Center (CTC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2021 Oct;93(3):864-880. doi: 10.1177/0091415020981775. Epub 2020 Dec 18.

Abstract

A validation study the Iranian Modified Barthel Index (MBI) in hospitalized acute stroke elderly by classical test theory approach and investigate Rasch analysis for both Iranian version MBI and BI and compare the hierarchical item difficulty of them. Face-to-face interview with 100 geriatric stroke inpatients 60+ or their caregivers was done in a cross-sectional study. First, construct validity of MBI analyzed by the classical test theory, then Rasch analysis were done for BI and MBI. The reliability of the Iranian MBI was significant at 0.955. One factor achieved by the variance of 83.2%. In Rasch analysis for MBI, the most difficult item was stair climbing, whereas the simplest items were bowel and bladder control. In BI, the most difficult items were toilet use and ambulation. The Iranian MBI is very accurate and reliable; therefore the use of MBI to measure better outcomes in stroke elderly inpatients is recommended comparing with BI.

摘要

一项使用经典测试理论对住院老年急性脑卒中患者的伊朗改良巴氏指数(MBI)进行验证的研究,并对伊朗 MBI 和 BI 进行 Rasch 分析,比较它们的层级项目难度。在一项横断面研究中,对 100 名 60 岁及以上的老年脑卒中住院患者或其照顾者进行面对面访谈。首先,使用经典测试理论分析 MBI 的结构效度,然后对 BI 和 MBI 进行 Rasch 分析。伊朗 MBI 的可靠性在 0.955 时显著。通过方差实现了 83.2%的一个因素。在 MBI 的 Rasch 分析中,最难的项目是爬楼梯,而最简单的项目是排便和控制膀胱。在 BI 中,最难的项目是使用厕所和走动。伊朗 MBI 非常准确可靠;因此,与 BI 相比,建议使用 MBI 来衡量脑卒中住院老年患者的更好结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验