• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科学本质知识的增加会提高公众对科学的接受度,而不受身份因素的影响。

Knowledge about the nature of science increases public acceptance of science regardless of identity factors.

机构信息

Villanova University, USA.

Texas Tech University, USA.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2021 Feb;30(2):120-138. doi: 10.1177/0963662520977700. Epub 2020 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1177/0963662520977700
PMID:33336623
Abstract

While people's views about science are related to identity factors (e.g. political orientation) and to knowledge of scientific theories, knowledge about how science works in general also plays an important role. To test this claim, we administered two detailed assessments about the practices of science to a demographically representative sample of the US public ( = 1500), along with questions about the acceptance of evolution, climate change, and vaccines. Participants' political and religious views predicted their acceptance of scientific claims, as in prior work. But a greater knowledge of the nature of science and a more mature view of how to mitigate scientific disagreements each related positively to acceptance. Importantly, the positive effect of scientific thinking on acceptance held regardless of participants' political ideology or religiosity. Increased attention to developing people's knowledge of how science works could thus help to combat resistance to scientific claims across the political and religious spectrum.

摘要

虽然人们对科学的看法与身份因素(如政治取向)和对科学理论的了解有关,但对科学一般运作方式的了解也起着重要作用。为了验证这一说法,我们向具有代表性的美国公众样本(=1500)发放了两份关于科学实践的详细评估问卷,以及关于进化论、气候变化和疫苗的接受度问题。与之前的研究一样,参与者的政治和宗教观点预测了他们对科学主张的接受程度。但是,对科学本质的更多了解以及对缓解科学分歧的更成熟看法,都与接受度呈正相关。重要的是,科学思维对接受度的积极影响与参与者的政治意识形态或宗教信仰无关。因此,更多地关注培养人们对科学运作方式的了解,可能有助于在政治和宗教领域抵制对科学主张的抵制。

相似文献

1
Knowledge about the nature of science increases public acceptance of science regardless of identity factors.科学本质知识的增加会提高公众对科学的接受度,而不受身份因素的影响。
Public Underst Sci. 2021 Feb;30(2):120-138. doi: 10.1177/0963662520977700. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
2
Not All Skepticism Is Equal: Exploring the Ideological Antecedents of Science Acceptance and Rejection.并非所有的怀疑都是平等的:探究科学接受和拒绝的意识形态前提。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Mar;44(3):384-405. doi: 10.1177/0146167217741314. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
3
Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science.受世界观驱动而对科学和科学规范的排斥。
Cognition. 2021 Oct;215:104820. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
4
Ignorance or culture war? Christian nationalism and scientific illiteracy.无知还是文化战争?基督教民族主义与科学素养匮乏。
Public Underst Sci. 2021 Nov;30(8):930-946. doi: 10.1177/09636625211006271. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
5
Science beliefs, political ideology, and cognitive sophistication.科学信念、政治意识形态与认知成熟度。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Jan;152(1):80-97. doi: 10.1037/xge0001267. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
6
Climate Change Disinformation and How to Combat It.气候变化相关虚假信息及应对措施
Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;42:1-21. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102409. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
7
Predictors of trust in the general science and climate science research of US federal agencies.预测美国联邦机构的一般科学和气候科学研究的信任度的因素。
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Oct;26(7):843-860. doi: 10.1177/0963662516636040. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
8
Explaining public understanding of the concepts of climate change, nutrition, poverty and effective medical drugs: An international experimental survey.解释公众对气候变化、营养、贫困和有效药物概念的理解:一项国际实验调查。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 10;15(6):e0234036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234036. eCollection 2020.
9
How Climate Change Science Is Reflected in People's Minds. A Cross-Country Study on People's Perceptions of Climate Change.气候变化科学如何反映在人们的思维中。一项关于人们对气候变化看法的跨国研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 2;19(7):4280. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074280.
10
Public Reception of Climate Science: Coherence, Reliability, and Independence.公众对气候科学的接受度:连贯性、可靠性和独立性。
Top Cogn Sci. 2016 Jan;8(1):180-95. doi: 10.1111/tops.12173. Epub 2015 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Contested science communication: Representations of scientists and their science in newspaper articles and the associated comment sections.有争议的科学传播:报纸文章及其相关评论区中科学家及其科学的呈现
Public Underst Sci. 2025 Aug;34(6):810-828. doi: 10.1177/09636625251325453. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
2
AFLW and the gender gap: an analysis of public attitudes towards the Women's Australian Football League.澳大利亚女子足球联赛与性别差距:公众对澳大利亚女子足球联赛态度的分析
Aust J Psychol. 2024 Feb 12;76(1):2315949. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2024.2315949. eCollection 2024.
3
'I think youtube's turning me into a flat earther': Social media's role in ex-conspiracy theorists entering and exiting anti-scientific communities.
“我觉得YouTube正在把我变成一个地平论者”:社交媒体在有过阴谋论经历者进出反科学群体过程中的作用。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 16;20(6):e0323436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323436. eCollection 2025.
4
Political polarization and health.政治极化与健康。
Nat Med. 2024 Nov;30(11):3085-3093. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03307-w. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
5
Reasoning about climate change.关于气候变化的推理。
PNAS Nexus. 2023 May 2;2(5):pgad100. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad100. eCollection 2023 May.
6
People with more extreme attitudes towards science have self-confidence in their understanding of science, even if this is not justified.对科学持有更极端态度的人对自己对科学的理解充满信心,即使这种理解没有充分依据。
PLoS Biol. 2023 Jan 24;21(1):e3001915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001915. eCollection 2023 Jan.
7
Trust, Science Education and Vaccines.信任、科学教育与疫苗
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022;31(5):1263-1280. doi: 10.1007/s11191-022-00339-x. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
8
Charting cognition: Mapping public understanding of COVID-19.绘制认知图:描绘公众对 COVID-19 的理解。
Public Underst Sci. 2022 Jul;31(5):534-552. doi: 10.1177/09636625221078462. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
9
How a few poorly designed COVID-19 studies may have contributed to misinformation in Brazil: the case for evidence-based communication of science.一些设计不佳的新冠病毒研究如何在巴西助长了错误信息:基于证据的科学传播之实例
BMJ Open Sci. 2021 Sep 2;5(1):e100202. doi: 10.1136/bmjos-2021-100202. eCollection 2021.
10
Do We Have a Problem? Exploring Undergraduate Student Views on the Tentativeness and Trustworthiness of Science.我们有问题吗?探索本科生对科学的试探性和可信度的看法。
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022;31(5):1209-1238. doi: 10.1007/s11191-021-00292-1. Epub 2022 Jan 9.